No description available.

No description available.

The thesis is divided in two sections; the first section consists in a critical document while the second presents my own creative writing, a play intitled Le Foyer. My use of theatrical writing in Le Foyer sought to privilege certain litterary techniques and dramatic processes elaborated by Antonin Artaud (1896-1948) in his manifesto The Theatre and his Double (1938). The thesis' theoretical section explores various issues at stake in my creative writing exercise: the link between the play Les Cenci and Artaud's metaphysic is questionned. I aimed to demonstrate how Les Cenci is an improbable example of the concept of Theatre of Cruelty. I stressed the liberties the playwright has taken with his theory when putting it into practice in a first attempt to create total theatre.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1981. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 191-196).

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of St Andrews, May 2009. / Electronic version restricted until 12th May 2014.

Techn. Universiẗat, Diss. 2003--Berlin.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Este trabalho propõe uma análise da viagem do artista francês Antonin Artaud ao México no ano de 1936. Por meio das correspondências e dos textos de Artaud produzidos neste país, pretende-se problematizar a sua concepção sobre a Revolução Mexicana e sobre os seus desdobramentos políticos e culturais durante os anos 1930, as suas ideias sobre as culturas indígenas e a sua relação com a realidade artística-intelectual mexicana. Parte-se da premissa de que o olhar de Artaud para o México foi formado por um ambiente intelectual e artístico marcado pelo Surrealismo, por um sentimento de crise da civilização europeia e por uma busca por formas de vida mais integradas entre o homem, a natureza e a arte. Artaud chega ao México em fevereiro de 1936 e permanece no país durante oito meses. Segundo suas próprias palavras, fora em busca do que ele denominaria de esoterismo mexicano o único que se apóia ainda sobre o sangue e a magnificência de uma terra cuja magia só os imitadores fanatizados da Europa podem ignorar. Durante a estadia, antes de ir à terra dos Tarahumaras, proferiu conferências na Escola Nacional Preparatória e escreveu artigos em jornais mexicanos a respeito do teatro europeu, do teatro mexicano, do movimento surrealista francês, das suas expectativas com relação à cultura indígena mexicana e da sua busca existencial como artista. No entanto, a sua visita ao México se dá justamente no período pós-revolucionário, durante o polêmico e marcante governo de Lázaro Cárdenas, no qual há uma radicalização da querela entre os artistas denominados universalistas e aqueles conhecidos como nacionalistas. Os primeiros, ao defenderem uma arte moderna e universal, preconizavam a arte europeia como matriz aspecto que Artaud repudiava e os segundos, ao afirmarem uma arte nacional, pura, utilizavam-se da cultura indígena como elemento unificador da nação, mas sem o respeito pela magia e pelo esoterismo indígena que Artaud tanto pregava. Daí as hipóteses para a falta de repercussão sobre o artista francês durante a sua permanência no país. Artaud também projetou sobre o México percepções que ele nutria a respeito do teatro. Idealizador do chamado Teatro da Crueldade, Artaud reconheceu no ritual do peyote praticado pelos índios tarahumaras no México uma vivência que se aproximava do seu projeto teatral / This work proposes an analysis about the Mexico trip realized by the French artist Antonin Artaud in 1936. With Artauds correspondences and texts written in this country, it intends to discuss his conception about Mexican revolution and its political and cultural results during the 1930s years, his ideas about the Indian cultures and his relation with the Mexican artistic intellectual reality. We have the premise that Artauds look to México was formed by an intellectual and artistic surrounding marked for the Surrealism, by an European civilizations crisis feeling and by a search for lifes forms more integrated between man, nature and arts. Artaud arrived in México in February of 1936 and stayed in the country during eight months. With his own words, he was searching for what he called by Mexican esoterism the only one that still rest on the blood and the magnificent of a land whose magic only the fanatics imitators from Europe can ignore. During his permanence, before going to Tarahumaras land, Artaud was the speaker for conferences in the National Preparatory School and wrote articles for the Mexican newspapers about the European theatre, the Mexican theatre, the French surrealist movement and his Mexican Indian culture expectation. He also wrote about his own experience about his existential search as an artist. However, his Mexico visit had been done in the post-revolutionary period, during the polemic and notorious Lázaro Cárdenas government, when there was a radicalization of the debate between the artists known as universalists and other as nationalists. The first ones, when defended a modern and universal art, commended the European art as matrix aspect repudiated by Artaud and the second ones, when asseverated a national art, pure, had utilized the Indian culture like nations unifier element, but without the respect for the magic and for the Indian esoterism that Artaud always had been preached. These aspects could integrate the hypothesis that explains the lack of repercussion about the French artist during his stay in the country. Artaud also projected in Mexico the perceptions that he created about the theatre. The artist was the idealizer of the Cruelty Theatre, and he recognized in the Peyotes ceremony practiced by the Tarahumaras Indians in Mexico an environment close to his theatrical project