Thesis (M. Div.)--St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, 1975. / Includes bibliographical references.

Inaug.-dis.--Utrecht.

Thesis (B.A.)--Haverford College, Dept. of Philosophy, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references.

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Portland, 1942. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-119).

Thesis (M.A.)--Portland University, 1942. / Bibliography: leaves 118-119.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, 1930. / "Private edition, distributed by the University of Chicago Libraries, Chicago, Illinois." "Reprinted from Social service monographs, no. 16, 1931."

Thesis (LL. M.)--University of Toronto, 2004. / Adviser: Bruce Chapman.

With the increased number of natural disasters that have plagued the world in recent years, benefits and charities have become forefront in the media and in people’s minds. The most publicized of these charities are ones that invoke the names and the use of celebrities. I intend to discuss how works of charity and philanthropy can be conceptualized as consumption of cultural capital, and how these works can be interpreted in some cases as merely an expedient way to gain social capital or higher social standing within society. Even though this use of munificence has been traditionally frowned upon, I will use Thorstein Veblen, David Riesman, and other social theorists to argue that such misuse is universal and trans-historical. It is important to question the historical and current motivations behind philanthropic or charitable participation, especially by those who can be labeled the socially powerful, because their actions are emulated by the rest of society. Understanding the motivations behind giving is becoming progressively more important for two reasons. First, contemporary society is becoming increasingly more celebrity oriented where recognition is due to conspicuous social status, as opposed to what you have done. Due to this fixation on fame, celebrities influence many aspects of society, including people’s very behavior. The second reason motivations should be explored and questioned is that the incentives behind giving have not previously been explored in-depth, and therefore charity can not be adequately understood. The amalgamation of these two subjects into one topic is in itself important. By doing such, I bring a new perspective to the discourse on celebrity and of giving. This question also needs to be asked since understanding who these people are, and historically were, and why they give to charity, is to understand what charity is, and has evolved into. If givers’ motivations are not properly examined, giving may become just another empty gesture in a multitude of empty gestures, as they are depicted by Jean Baudrillard and other postmodernists.