This research discusses the project management using the Cooperation Information System Framework in accordance to the distributed environment demand, as well as the information technology application, in human cooperative work practice, the project team organizes, as well as the project information system three between reciprocity; And, the union Collaborative Project Management Architecture, develops this research subject Integrated Collaborative Project Management Information System, and the definition is " A large-scale, modularity, integrated process guidance system, conformity project management information flow and so on process plan, execution, control, take coordinates the cooperation as a foundation, emphatically the team member's communication coordination ability, with the project information management, provides the project decision-making information, the promotion project carries out the achievements and the quick reaction capability." . Integrated collaborative project management information system, emphatically in the emphasis project process management, the project member coordinates the cooperation the communication mechanism, as well as the project information database uses again, and does take the component integrated concept as the system framework foundation, may do for the new generation of project management system software development basis. In addition, this research takes the project-driven as the enterprise mainly operates basal engineering company for apply object, with the Integrated Collaborative Project Management System Architecture, be used as the nucleus that the engineering company enterprise applies the structure, and according to configure with the layout engineering project management system, and describe its system establishment process.

O termo de Banco de Dados Espacial tem sido usado frequentemente nas aplicações relativas a Sistemas de Informações Geográficas. Isto demonstra a aplicação de uma ferramenta computacional poderosa (Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Banco de Dados) na solução de problemas de Planejamento Urbano e Regional. Para que o Banco de Dados possa operar necessita uma Fonte de Dados ou Base de Dados que alimente a sua estrutura e garanta a qualidade e precisão dessas informações. Daí em diante se podeaplicar as suas próprias capacidades na solução dos problemas dos seus usuários. Reduzindo a escala podemos traçar um paralelo entre os Projetos de Planejamento Urbano e em Projeto de Edificações, logo as mesmas ferramentas podem ser utilizadas neste segundo tipo de projetos. Preparando caminho à utilização destas ferramentas, este trabalho relata o caminho escolhido, a implementação e a aplicação de uma abordagem de formação de Base de Dados Espaciais a partir do projeto de Edificações. / Spatial database is a term frequently used in Geographic Information Systems applications. This means the use of a powerful computing tool (Database Management System) in solving Regional and Urban Planning problems. A Database Management System needs a Data Source or Base of Data for the Data entry and quality and precise information guaranteening. Then we can use its own capacities in the solution of the problems of the users. Reducing the scale we can make a parallel between Urban Planning Design and Building Design and the same tools can be used for the second. Preparing the way of the utilization of these tools, this work speak about the choosing way, the implementation and an approach application of Base of Data formation from Building Design.

Os projetos de desenvolvimento realizados em colaboração são fundamentais para que as empresas de máquinas agrícolas consigam aumentar o grau de inovação em produtos, permitindo-as acompanhar os novos desafios de um mercado mais competitivo. Há na literatura vários trabalhos que identificam fatores críticos de sucesso (FCS) para projetos colaborativos, porém, não há muitos estudos sobre a verificação desses fatores no Brasil, em especial na indústria de máquinas agrícolas (IMA). Este trabalho tem como objetivo verificar se os FCS identificados na literatura poderiam ser empregados nesse contexto. Empreendeu-se uma revisão bibliográfica para identificar os fatores críticos de sucesso em projetos colaborativos de desenvolvimento de produtos e uma revisão sobre indústria de máquinas agrícolas (IMA), de forma a entender as especificidades desse setor no Brasil. Em seguida, realizou-se um levantamento em uma empresa do setor, com nível de maturidade elevado em desenvolvimento de produto, medido conforme Simões (2007), para verificar se os FCS identificados poderiam ser utilizados em levantamentos no setor e verificar se não havia outros fatores a serem considerados, específicos para o segmento e região. Utilizou-se o método do estudo de caso único, do tipo incorporado. A unidade de análise é constituída por projetos do tipo colaborativo, realizados com sucesso pela empresa. Foram analisados dois projetos de produtos inovadores, com diferentes tipos de parceiro: um com um cliente e outro com um fornecedor. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas e o instrumento de pesquisa é um roteiro. As instalações da empresa foram visitadas com o objetivo de conhecer os projetos analisados. Como resultado afirma-se que há fatores descritos na literatura que podem não ser críticos; indica-se a existência de novos FCS e reforça-se a importância dos fatores ligados à garantia de igualdade e fatores universais de sucesso. A contribuição do trabalho é uma lista de fatores críticos de sucesso que podem servir como passo inicial para levantamentos gerais de campo no setor industrial estudado. / The collaborative projects of development are one of the main tools in order to agricultural machines companies get to increase the innovation degree in products, allowing them to follow the new challenges of a more competitive market. There is in the literature several works that identify critical success factors (CSF) for collaborative projects; however, there are not many studies about the verification of those factors in Brazil, especially in the agricultural machinery industry. The aim of this work is to verify if identified CSF in the literature could be used in that context. A bibliographical revision was undertaken to identify the \"critical success factors\" in collaborative projects of development of products and a revision on agricultural machines industry in order to understand the specificities of that section in Brazil. After that it has taken place a survey in a company of that sector, with high level of maturity in development of measured product according to Simões (2007), to verify if identified CSF could be used in surveys in that sector and to verify if there were any other factors to be considered, specific for that segment and field. A case study was used and the units of analysis are collaborative projects accomplished successfully by the company. Two projects development of products were analyzed, with different kinds of partner: one with a customer and the other with a supplying company. Besides the interviews it has taken visits to the companies in order to know the analyzed projects. There are factors described that could not be critical; the results indicate the existence of new critical factors and they confirm the importance of equality and universal factors as critical for collaborative projects. The main contribution of these projects is a list of critical factors of success that one can serve as initial step for general survey in this field.

Cross-company product development projects are often managed without clearly defined project goals and without an alignment of these goals to an organisations strategy and objectives. With a shift towards more decentralised and distributed development teams, and an increasing level of collaboration, project transparency is reduced and status measurement more difficult due to a lack of transparency. To overcome these difficulties, the quality of collaboration in the automotive manufacturing industry needs to be improved. The understanding of unifying goals and of the mutual purpose to produce new products is essential for efficient and effective collaboration. A methodological study in the automotive industry as part of this research lead to the conclusion that a strategic scorecard method based on the Balanced Scorecard concept by Kaplan and Norton is capable to improve cross-company project management and reduce existing difficulties in typical product development collaboration, such as communication or collaborative risk management. A common definition of project goals, leading and lagging indicators to measure the status, and defining corrective action are core elements of the Collaborative Project Scorecard concept. This thesis identifies the current problems and difficulties in automotive project management and explores solutions to improve its efficiency and effectiveness based on the Collaborative Project Scorecard. It is shown how the concept is derived from business strategies for an improved alignment of project goals with business objectives. A project impact analysis facilitates the development of project strategy maps to increase transparency of goal impact interdependencies. Furthermore, based on the results of workshops, surveys, and interviews the Collaborative Project Scorecard concept is applied to typical automotive product development projects and the identified advantages and limitations are evaluated by an application to a crosscompany project of an automotive supplier and a manufacturer. The development of the Collaborative Project Scorecard is followed by a software implementation of the results. The integration of a collaborative project management model that has a focus on time, task and communication management enables the project manager to create operational indicators that can be controlled on a strategic level by the Collaborative Project Scorecard. Additionally, it is shown how risk management and performance assessment are supported by the concept. Advantages, benefits, and limitations of the methodology are identified and further application scenarios suggested.

Dans le contexte spécifique de coopétition entre les membres des clusters, l'émergence de projets collaboratifs innovants est une question clé pour les adhérents et les structures permanentes des clusters. Compte-tenu des écosystèmes hétérogènes qui évoluent au sein des clusters, la stratégie d'Interclustering qui est menée pour créer de nouveaux types de projets intersectoriels nécessite de nouveaux outils appropriés pour soutenir l'émergence d'idées innovantes et créatives. De fortes synergies sont mises en évidence grâce à l'animation de clubs d'innovation impliquant des participants provenant des milieux industriels, académiques, scientifiques et des structures de développement économique. / In the specific context of coopetition between members of clusters, innovative collaborative projects emergence is a key issue for members and clusters. Given the heterogeneous ecosystems that evolve within the clusters, the interclustering strategy which is conducted to create new types of cross-sectoral projects require new appropriate tools to support creative and new ideas emergence. Strong synergies are highlighted through the use of the discovering matrix and 9 screens tools. These links help facilitators of clusters to optimize the preparation and animation of creative sessions. Strong synergies are highlighted through the animation of innovative clubs involving participants from industrial, academic, scientific and economic development organizations.

Os projetos de desenvolvimento realizados em colaboração são fundamentais para que as empresas de máquinas agrícolas consigam aumentar o grau de inovação em produtos, permitindo-as acompanhar os novos desafios de um mercado mais competitivo. Há na literatura vários trabalhos que identificam fatores críticos de sucesso (FCS) para projetos colaborativos, porém, não há muitos estudos sobre a verificação desses fatores no Brasil, em especial na indústria de máquinas agrícolas (IMA). Este trabalho tem como objetivo verificar se os FCS identificados na literatura poderiam ser empregados nesse contexto. Empreendeu-se uma revisão bibliográfica para identificar os fatores críticos de sucesso em projetos colaborativos de desenvolvimento de produtos e uma revisão sobre indústria de máquinas agrícolas (IMA), de forma a entender as especificidades desse setor no Brasil. Em seguida, realizou-se um levantamento em uma empresa do setor, com nível de maturidade elevado em desenvolvimento de produto, medido conforme Simões (2007), para verificar se os FCS identificados poderiam ser utilizados em levantamentos no setor e verificar se não havia outros fatores a serem considerados, específicos para o segmento e região. Utilizou-se o método do estudo de caso único, do tipo incorporado. A unidade de análise é constituída por projetos do tipo colaborativo, realizados com sucesso pela empresa. Foram analisados dois projetos de produtos inovadores, com diferentes tipos de parceiro: um com um cliente e outro com um fornecedor. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas e o instrumento de pesquisa é um roteiro. As instalações da empresa foram visitadas com o objetivo de conhecer os projetos analisados. Como resultado afirma-se que há fatores descritos na literatura que podem não ser críticos; indica-se a existência de novos FCS e reforça-se a importância dos fatores ligados à garantia de igualdade e fatores universais de sucesso. A contribuição do trabalho é uma lista de fatores críticos de sucesso que podem servir como passo inicial para levantamentos gerais de campo no setor industrial estudado. / The collaborative projects of development are one of the main tools in order to agricultural machines companies get to increase the innovation degree in products, allowing them to follow the new challenges of a more competitive market. There is in the literature several works that identify critical success factors (CSF) for collaborative projects; however, there are not many studies about the verification of those factors in Brazil, especially in the agricultural machinery industry. The aim of this work is to verify if identified CSF in the literature could be used in that context. A bibliographical revision was undertaken to identify the \"critical success factors\" in collaborative projects of development of products and a revision on agricultural machines industry in order to understand the specificities of that section in Brazil. After that it has taken place a survey in a company of that sector, with high level of maturity in development of measured product according to Simões (2007), to verify if identified CSF could be used in surveys in that sector and to verify if there were any other factors to be considered, specific for that segment and field. A case study was used and the units of analysis are collaborative projects accomplished successfully by the company. Two projects development of products were analyzed, with different kinds of partner: one with a customer and the other with a supplying company. Besides the interviews it has taken visits to the companies in order to know the analyzed projects. There are factors described that could not be critical; the results indicate the existence of new critical factors and they confirm the importance of equality and universal factors as critical for collaborative projects. The main contribution of these projects is a list of critical factors of success that one can serve as initial step for general survey in this field.

O termo de Banco de Dados Espacial tem sido usado frequentemente nas aplicações relativas a Sistemas de Informações Geográficas. Isto demonstra a aplicação de uma ferramenta computacional poderosa (Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Banco de Dados) na solução de problemas de Planejamento Urbano e Regional. Para que o Banco de Dados possa operar necessita uma Fonte de Dados ou Base de Dados que alimente a sua estrutura e garanta a qualidade e precisão dessas informações. Daí em diante se podeaplicar as suas próprias capacidades na solução dos problemas dos seus usuários. Reduzindo a escala podemos traçar um paralelo entre os Projetos de Planejamento Urbano e em Projeto de Edificações, logo as mesmas ferramentas podem ser utilizadas neste segundo tipo de projetos. Preparando caminho à utilização destas ferramentas, este trabalho relata o caminho escolhido, a implementação e a aplicação de uma abordagem de formação de Base de Dados Espaciais a partir do projeto de Edificações. / Spatial database is a term frequently used in Geographic Information Systems applications. This means the use of a powerful computing tool (Database Management System) in solving Regional and Urban Planning problems. A Database Management System needs a Data Source or Base of Data for the Data entry and quality and precise information guaranteening. Then we can use its own capacities in the solution of the problems of the users. Reducing the scale we can make a parallel between Urban Planning Design and Building Design and the same tools can be used for the second. Preparing the way of the utilization of these tools, this work speak about the choosing way, the implementation and an approach application of Base of Data formation from Building Design.

<p>För att erbjuda insatser till utsatta barn och familjer som lever i en riskutsatt miljö startades hösten 2007 samverkansprojektet Tummen i Karlstad kommun. Projektet ska nu utvärderas och denna uppsats är en del i denna utvärdering.</p><p>Syftet är att studera i vilken utsträckning personalen i Förskoleteamet Tummen har rapporterat olika typer av enskild respektive överlappande problematik för de barn och familjer som aktualiserats hos teamet. Vidare att utifrån rapporterad problematik studera val av insats hos teamet och personalens uppfattning om familjens behov av fortsatt stöd efter avslutad insats.</p><p>Undersökningen är kvantitativ och bygger på utvärderingsmallar, som har fyllts i av Förskoleteamets personal vid varje aktualisering, totalt 125 stycken.</p><p>Studien visar att de vanligaste rapporterade svårigheterna hos barnet är aggressivitet och samspelssvårigheter. Inåtagerande problematik rapporteras däremot i liten grad. Vidare framkommer att två- eller flerspråkiga familjer generellt sett rapporteras ha fler svårigheter än enbart svenskspråkiga. Vilken insats barnet/familjen får samt hur väl personalen anser att Tummen har tillgodosett behovet av stöd, påverkas enbart av familjens samlade mängd svårigheter. Enligt resultatet lyckas Förskoleteamet, enligt egen uppfattning, ge tillräckligt stöd till en majoritet av de aktualiserade. I ärenden då såväl familj som barn haft många svårigheter bedöms däremot Tummens insatser i många fall som otillräckliga. Resultaten är analyserade utifrån ett förebyggande perspektiv med fokusering på riskfaktorer.</p> / <p>The collaborative project Tummen was launched in autumn 2007 in Karlstad. The intention was to offer interventions for children and families who live in a riskfull environment. This essay is part of an evaluation of the project.</p><p>The purposes were to investigate the extent to which the personnel of the Preeschool Team have reported various types of single and overlapping problems of children and families, case-registrated in the team. Another purpose was to study the team’s choice of intervention based on the reported problems and to see whether the aid, according to the personnels’ interpretation, is sufficient.</p><p>This is a quantitative study based on evaluation-models, which have been completed by the personnel of all the 125 case-registrated children.</p><p>The study shows that the reported main difficulties of the children are an aggressive behavior or interaction difficulties. Inwards-acting problems are reported more seldom. Furthermore, it seems like bi- or multilingual families in general have more difficulties than families that speak only Swedish, according to the personnel. What intervention the child/family is given and how well the personnel believe that the intervention has satisfied the family’s need for assistance, is highly affected by the total amount of difficulties in the family.</p><p>The personnel seems to, in their own opinion, succeed to provide sufficient support for a majority of the families. However, if both the family and the child had many difficulties the support was more often estimated as insufficient. The results are analyzed from a prevention perspective, focusing on risk factors.</p>

För att erbjuda insatser till utsatta barn och familjer som lever i en riskutsatt miljö startades hösten 2007 samverkansprojektet Tummen i Karlstad kommun. Projektet ska nu utvärderas och denna uppsats är en del i denna utvärdering. Syftet är att studera i vilken utsträckning personalen i Förskoleteamet Tummen har rapporterat olika typer av enskild respektive överlappande problematik för de barn och familjer som aktualiserats hos teamet. Vidare att utifrån rapporterad problematik studera val av insats hos teamet och personalens uppfattning om familjens behov av fortsatt stöd efter avslutad insats. Undersökningen är kvantitativ och bygger på utvärderingsmallar, som har fyllts i av Förskoleteamets personal vid varje aktualisering, totalt 125 stycken. Studien visar att de vanligaste rapporterade svårigheterna hos barnet är aggressivitet och samspelssvårigheter. Inåtagerande problematik rapporteras däremot i liten grad. Vidare framkommer att två- eller flerspråkiga familjer generellt sett rapporteras ha fler svårigheter än enbart svenskspråkiga. Vilken insats barnet/familjen får samt hur väl personalen anser att Tummen har tillgodosett behovet av stöd, påverkas enbart av familjens samlade mängd svårigheter. Enligt resultatet lyckas Förskoleteamet, enligt egen uppfattning, ge tillräckligt stöd till en majoritet av de aktualiserade. I ärenden då såväl familj som barn haft många svårigheter bedöms däremot Tummens insatser i många fall som otillräckliga. Resultaten är analyserade utifrån ett förebyggande perspektiv med fokusering på riskfaktorer. / The collaborative project Tummen was launched in autumn 2007 in Karlstad. The intention was to offer interventions for children and families who live in a riskfull environment. This essay is part of an evaluation of the project. The purposes were to investigate the extent to which the personnel of the Preeschool Team have reported various types of single and overlapping problems of children and families, case-registrated in the team. Another purpose was to study the team’s choice of intervention based on the reported problems and to see whether the aid, according to the personnels’ interpretation, is sufficient. This is a quantitative study based on evaluation-models, which have been completed by the personnel of all the 125 case-registrated children. The study shows that the reported main difficulties of the children are an aggressive behavior or interaction difficulties. Inwards-acting problems are reported more seldom. Furthermore, it seems like bi- or multilingual families in general have more difficulties than families that speak only Swedish, according to the personnel. What intervention the child/family is given and how well the personnel believe that the intervention has satisfied the family’s need for assistance, is highly affected by the total amount of difficulties in the family. The personnel seems to, in their own opinion, succeed to provide sufficient support for a majority of the families. However, if both the family and the child had many difficulties the support was more often estimated as insufficient. The results are analyzed from a prevention perspective, focusing on risk factors.

Tom Andersen (1995) utvecklade samtal där terapeut och klient tillsammans utvärderar samarbetet i terapin, samtal med reflekterande förhållningssätt som senare kom att kallas för samforskningssamtal. Samtal med ombytta roller, där terapeuten får lära av klienten. Studier har visat att samforskningssamtalen ger terapeutiska effekter med ökad känslan av samhörighet, fördjupad samskapande process och hjälper terapin framåt samt ger terapeuterna ökade kunskaper om sig själva som terapeut. Syftet med denna studie är att belysa om samforskningssamtal kan ge möjligheter och betydelse i pågående terapi och i så fall vilka. -Hur upplevdes samforskningssamtalet? -Vad fick terapeut respektive patient syn på i samforskningssamtalet? -Vilken betydelse kan samforskningssamtalet ha framöver i terapin? Två samforskningssamtal har hållits och därefter har en intervju hållits med var och en av deltagarna. Materialet har spelats in, analyserats och bearbetats samt sedan redovisats utifrån frågeställningarna. Undersökningsdeltagare har varit en terapeut, två patienter samt en gästande kollega. Jag själv har deltagit som observatör under samforskningssamtalen. Resultaten visar på att samforskningssamtalen gav möjligheter och betydelser i dessa pågående terapier, delande av tankar och känslor, benämning av relationer, klargöranden samt att synliggöra terapeutens sätt att vara. Både terapeut och patient upplevde samforskningssamtalet som positivt och givande. Det mest betydelsefulla som framkom var att terapeut och patient fick möjlighet att dela med sig av sina tankar och känslor. Detta ökade samhörigheten. Klargöranden gjordes om bland annat terapins innehåll och ramar. Särskilt betydelsefullt visade sig samforskningssamtalet vara för terapeuten, som en möjlighet till att få feedback. Terapeuten fick syn på sitt sätt att vara tillsammans med sin patient. Samforskningssamtal har också visat sig i tidigare studier ha en viktig betydelse att fylla för både terapeut och patient, bl a som en hjälpsam intervention i terapiarbetet samt att ge terapeuten feedback. Samtalsledarens, den gästande kollegans, känslighet i att ställa frågor har en viktig betydelse. En av frågorna som väcktes är hur terapeuten skulle kunna använda sig av samforskningssamtalets idé i det dagliga behandlingsarbetet, kanske i en modifierad form och som ett komplement till andra utvärderingsformer. Få kritiska åsikter har framkommit i denna uppsats liksom i tidigare studier, om samforskningssamtalet som form och metod. Dess positiva betydelse är klart överrepresenterat dokumenterat. / Tom Andersen (1995) developed the conversations in which therapist and client together evaluate collaboration in therapy, conversation with reflective position that later became known as co-research conversation, in Swedish called “samforskningsamtal”. Conversation with the roles reversed, where the therapist may teach the client. Studies have shown that co-research conversation provide therapeutic effects with an increased feeling of connectedness, in-depth co-creative process, helps the therapy forward and give therapists a better understanding of themselves as a therapist . The purpose of this study is to shed light on if co-research conversation can provide opportunities and importance of ongoing therapy, and if so, which. - How experienced co-research conversation? - What of importance did the therapist and patient get from the    samforskningssamtalet? - What significance can co-research conversation have into the therapy? Two co-research conversations have been held and then have an interview held with each of the participants. The material has been recorded, analyzed and processed, and then recognized based issues. The participants have been a therapist, two patients and a visiting colleague. I have participated as an observer during co-research conversations. The results show that co-research conversation gave possibilities and meanings in these ongoing therapies, namely the sharing of thoughts and feelings, designation of relationships, clarifications and visibility in the therapist's way of being. Both therapist and patient experiences co-research conversation as positive. The most significant to emerge was that the therapist and the patient had the opportunity to share their thoughts and feelings. This increased affinity. Clarifications were made about including therapy's content and context. Particularly significant was found to co-research conversation be for the therapist, as an opportunity to get feedback. The therapist saw her way to be with his patient. Co-research conversation has also been shown in previous studies to have an important role to play for both therapist and patient, as a helpful intervention in therapy work, and to give the therapist feedback. The interviewer's, the visiting colleague, sensitivity in asking questions has an important significance. One of the questions raised is how the therapist could use co-research conversations idea of daily treatment work, perhaps in a modified form and as a complement to other forms of evaluation. Nearly none critical views have emerged in this essay, as in previous studies, about co-research conversation as form and method. Its positive significance is clearly overrepresented documented.