Münster (Westfalen), Universiẗat, Diss., 2001. / Dateien im PDF-Format.

Münster (Westfalen), Universiẗat, Diss., 2003. / Dateien im PDF-Format.

In this study, mitochondrial transcript information from a recent EST project wasextended to obtain complete mitochondrial genome sequence for 5 tiger salamandercomplex species (Ambystoma mexicanum, A. t. tigrinum, A. andersoni, A. californiense,and A. dumerilii). For the first time, aspects of mitochondrial transcription in arepresentative amphibian are described, and then complete mitochondrial sequencedata are used to examine salamander phylogeny at both deep and shallow levels ofevolutionary divergence. The available mitochondrial ESTs for A. mexicanum (N=2481)and A. t. tigrinum (N=1205) provided 92% and 87% coverage of the mitochondrialgenome, respectively. Complete mitochondrial sequences for all species were rapidlyobtained by using long distance PCR and DNA sequencing. A number of genomestructural characteristics (base pair length, base composition, gene number, geneboundaries, codon usage) were highly similar among all species and to other distantlyrelated salamanders. Overall, mitochondrial transcription in Ambystoma approximatedthe pattern observed in other vertebrates. From the mapping of ESTs onto mtDNA it wasinferred that transcription occurs from both heavy and light strand promoters andcontinues around the entire length of the mtDNA, followed by post-transcriptionalprocessing. However, the observation of many short transcripts corresponding to rRNAgenes indicates that transcription may often terminate prematurely to bias transcriptionof rRNA genes; indeed an rRNA transcription termination signal sequence was observedimmediately following the 16S rRNA gene. Phylogenetic analyses of salamander familyrelationships consistently grouped Ambystomatidae in a clade containingCryptobranchidae and Hynobiidae, to the exclusion of Salamandridae. This robust resultsuggests a novel alternative hypothesis because previous studies have consistentlyidentified Ambystomatidae and Salamandridae as closely related taxa. Phylogeneticanalyses of tiger salamander complex species also produced robustly supported trees.The D-loop, used in previous molecular phylogenetic studies of the complex, was foundto contain a relatively low level of variation and we identified mitochondrial regions withhigher rates of molecular evolution that are more useful in resolving relationships amongspecies. Our results show the benefit of using complete mitochondrial genomeinformation in studies of recently and rapidly diverged taxa.

Techn. University, Diss., 2005--Dresden.

Salamanders have a remarkable ability to regenerate complex body parts including the limb, tail, and central nervous system. Although salamander regeneration has been studied for several hundred years, molecular-level studies have been limited to a relatively few important transcription factors and signaling molecules that are highly conserved among animals. Physiological genomic approaches were used here to investigate spinal cord and limb regeneration. Chapter 2 reports that hundreds of gene expression changes were identified during spinal cord regeneration, showing that a diverse injury response is activated in concert with extracellular matrix remodeling mechanisms during the early acute phase of natural spinal cord regeneration. Chapter 3 presents results that identify the salamander ortholog of mammalian Nogo-A, a gene known to inhibit mammalian nerve axon regeneration. Nogo-A gene expression was characterized during salamander development and adulthood in order to address the roles of Nogo-A in the nervous system. Chapters 4 and 5 use physiological genomic approaches to examine limb regeneration and why this process is dependent upon an intact nerve supply. Results presented in Chapter 4 showed that many processes regulated during early limb regeneration do not depend upon nerve-derived factors, but striking differences arise between innervated and denervated limbs by 14 days after amputation. Chapter 5 identified genes associated with peripheral nerve axon regeneration and identified gene candidates that may be secreted by nerves to support limb regeneration. Lastly, chapter 6 characterizes the expression of a developmentally important family of genes, matrix metalloproteinases, during tail regeneration. These results suggest that matrix metalloproteinases play multiple roles throughout the regeneration process. Primarily, this dissertation presents data from the first genomic studies of salamander regeneration. The results suggest genes such as matrix metalloproteinases, and molecular pathways such as the Wnt and FGF signaling pathways that can be exploited to enhance regenerative ability in humans.

Limb and digit loss poses a significant problem across the animal kingdom. Ambystoma mexicanum, commonly known as the axolotl, however, is one species that has achieved a remarkable ability to bypass the misfortune associated with a lost limb. Viewed as a model organism in regenerative studies, the axolotl retains extraordinary regenerative properties well into adulthood that humans severely lack. While the basics of regeneration have been described, much about the molecular processes of regeneration is still largely unknown. Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), an angiogenesis inhibitor, has been identified as a potential factor to play a significant role in the regrowth of limbs. Vascularization of tissues is vital to the survival of biological structures, and TSP-1 has been shown to play a regulatory role in the development and remodeling of tissue vasculature. Here, we study the effect of a loss-of-function mutation in the tsp-1 gene on the process of limb regeneration in the axolotl. Our studies reveal that tsp-1 -/- animals lag in regeneration time, developing smaller blastemas in the first three weeks of regeneration. We show that the loss of TSP-1, however, is not deleterious to the overall process of regeneration as late stage blastemas of the -/- animals catch up in size and development to the wild type animals after three weeks. Our data suggests that while TSP-1 may be important during the initial stages, it may not be required for proper regeneration.

Regeneration is a relatively widespread phenomenon in nature, although different organisms exhibit different abilities to reconstitute missing structures. Due to the diversity in the extent of damage the organisms can repair it has been debated for a long time whether those abilities are evolutionary traits that arose independently in multiple organisms or whether they represent a by-product of more basic processes. To date, due to constant increase in the amount of available genomic information this question can be approached by means of comparative genomics by comparing several taxa that have different regenerative capabilities. Two relatively closely related salamander species, newt, Notophthalmus viridescens, and the Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum, offer a unique opportunity to compare two organisms with well-known regenerative capabilities. Despite their importance for regeneration research, relatively little sequence information was available until recently, owing mainly to the large sizes of the respective genomes. In this work I aimed to create a comprehensive transcriptome assembly of the axolotl by sequencing and then assembling the sequence data from a number of tissues and developmental stages. I also incorporated available sequence information that mostly comes from cDNA libraries sequenced previously. I assessed the completeness of the transcriptome by comparing it to a set of available axolotl sequences and found that 96% of those have homologs in the assembly. Additionally, I found that 7,568 of 7,695 protein families common to vertebrates are also represented in the transcriptome. In order to turn the assembly from a merely collection of sequences into a valuable and useful resource for the entire research community I first annotated the sequences, predicted the open reading frames and protein domains and additionally put together multiple bits of information available for each sequence including but not limited to time-course and tissue- specific expression data and in situ hybridization results. The assembly was thereafter made available for the entire axolotl research community through a web portal I developed. Not only does the web portal provide access to the transcriptome data, it is also equipped with an engine for automated data retrieval, which could facilitate automated cross-species bioinformatics analyses. The study crossed the boundary between pure bioinformatics and biology as the transcriptome allowed for computational comparison of the axolotl and the newt in order to identify salamander-specific genes possibly implicated in regeneration and subsequent functional analysis thereof in the lab. Since regeneration closely resembles embryonic development in terms of genes involved in both processes, I first identified approximately 200 homologous contigs in axolotl and newt, which had a predicted open reading frame, but did not have homologs in non-regenerating species. The expression profile of one of those candidate genes suggested that it had a role in regeneration. I studied the molecular function of that gene using CRISPR/Cas system to confirm that it was protein-coding and to create knock-out animals to study the effect of gene knock-down and knock-out. Knock-out animals exhibited significant delays in both, limb development and tail regeneration. The exact mechanism causing this delay is currently being investigated.

Regeneration is a process that renews damaged or lost cells, tissues, or even of entire body structures, and is a phenomenon which is widespread in the animal kingdom. Urodeles such as newts and salamanders have a remarkable regeneration ability. They can regenerate organs such as gills, lower jaws, retina, appendages like fore- and hind limbs, and also the tail including the spinal cord. The regeneration process requires the use of resident stem cells or somatic cells, which have to be reprogrammed. In both cases the reprogrammed cells are less differentiated, meaning the cell would have the ability to form any kind of fetal or adult cell which rose from the three different germ layers, the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. Artificial reprogramming of differentiated mammalian somatic cell had been reported previously. It was shown that four pluripotency factors, OCT4 (also called POU5f1), SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4 are sufficient to generate an induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell. It has been shown that some of these factors are also involved in regenerating processes. In newt limb and lens tissue, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4 mRNA levels were upregulated in the beginning of blastema formation when compared to non-amputated tissue. Oct4 mRNA however, was not detected. During xenopus tail regeneration, Sox2 and c-Myc were expressed, while the xenopus Pou homologs Pou25, Pou60, Pou79, Pou91 were not detected. In regenerating zebrafish fin tissue, Sox2, Pou2, c-Myc and Klf4 mRNA were not upregulated. The mammalian transcription factor OCT4, a class V POU protein, is responsible in maintaining pluripotency in gastrula stage embryos. It was reported that mouse OCT4 is also expressed in the caudal node of embryos having 16 somites. It is further known that progenitors exist in mouse tailbud, which give rise to neural and mesodermal cell lineage. This suggests that the OCT4 expressing cells in caudal node might be a stem cell reservoir. Oct4 was detected in axolotl during embryonic development, and prior to my work we found Oct4 when screening the axolotl blastema cDNA library. In addition, we also identified Pou2, another class V POU gene. Phylogenetic analysis showed a clear distinction of both genes in the axolotl. We determined the mRNA pattern of Pou2 during embryogenesis and compared it to Oct4 mRNA and protein. Both genes are expressed in the primordial germ cells and the pluripotent animal cap region of the embryo. Apart from this similarity, both genes have a different expression pattern in the embryo. We are interested in the involvement of OCT4, POU2, as well as the transcription factor SOX2 in regenerating axolotl spinal cord. We asked whether the cellular pluripotent character conferred by POU factors is limited to mammals or if it is an ancient characteristic of lower vertebrates. To answer the question we performed in vitro and in vivo studies. Hence this thesis is separated into two chapter. By in vitro studies we investigated the pluripotent PouV orthologs from different species. Therefore, we performed reprogramming experiments using mouse or human fibroblasts and transduced them with axolotl Oct4 or Pou2, in combination with human or axolotl Sox2, c-Myc and/or Klf4. The generated iPS cells with the different sets of factors had similar endogenous pluripotency gene expression profiles to embryonic stem cells. Further, iPS cells expressed the pluripotency markers like OCT4, NANOG, SSEA4, TRA1-60 and TRA1-81. Another evaluation of the iPS cells was the formation of embryoid bodies. Immunouorescence staining showed that tissue from all three germ layers was formed after induction. We observed a positive staining for the endoderm marker !-FEROPROTEIN, the mesoderm marker !-SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN and the ectoderm marker \"III TUBULIN in the generated cells. This indicated that the iPS cells generated using axolotl Oct4 and Sox2 in combination with mammalian Klf4 and with or without c-Myc, as well as iPS cell generated with axolotl Pou2 and mammalian Sox2 and Klf4 and with or without c-Myc have a pluripotent potential. In addition, the axolotl factors are able to form heterodimers with the mammalian proteins. Furthermore, we compared the reprogramming ability with POU factors from mouse, human, zebrash, medaka and xenopus. We showed that xenopus Pou91, as the only non-mammalian example, is nearly as efficient as mouse and human Oct4 cDNAs in inducing GFP expressing cells. Also axolotl Pou2, axolotl Oct4 and medaka Pou2 showed reprogramming character however at a much lower efficiency. In contrast, zebrash Pou2 is not able to establish iPS cells. This indicates that a reprogramming ability to a pluripotent cell state is an ancient trait of Pou2 and Oct4 homologs. By in vivo studies we investigated the role of Oct4, Pou2 and Sox2 gene expression in regenerating spinal cord tissue. Performed in situ hybridizations and antibody staining studies in the regenerating spinal cord showed that Oct4, Pou2 and Sox2 were expressed during spinal cord regeneration. Knockdown experiments in regenerating spinal cord using morpholino showed that Pou2-morpholino does not have an effect. In contrast, SOX2 was required for spinal cord regeneration but to a lesser extent, than OCT4, which decreased the regenerated length signicantly compared to control. Even though, with Sox2-morpholino we did not observe the phenotype as a significantly shorter regenerated spinal cord, about 45% of SOX2 knocked down cells were not cycling and proliferating anymore. This indicates that axolotl SOX2 has an effect in regeneration. Therefore we wanted to know whether spinal cord cells would also have a pluripotent character in vivo and form other tissue types. Regenerating cells of the spinal cord are only able to form the same cell type and thus they keep their cell memory. However, when we performed transplantations of OCT4/SOX2 expressing spinal cord cells into somite stage embryos, we could show the formation of muscle cells. This shows that the spinal cord cells have the potential to change their fate in an embryonic context, where the normal environment of spinal cord has changed. However, our data do not indicate whether muscle is formed directly from the spinal cord or whether spinal cord cells fuse to developmental myoblasts, a cell type of embryonic progenitors, which give rise to muscle cells. To clearly state whether regenerating OCT4/SOX2 expressing spinal cord cells are pluripotent we have to perform OCT4 knock down in spinal cord and transplant these less proliferating cells into embryos, observing their cell fate.

Regeneration is a process that renews damaged or lost cells, tissues, or even of entire body structures, and is a phenomenon which is widespread in the animal kingdom. Urodeles such as newts and salamanders have a remarkable regeneration ability. They can regenerate organs such as gills, lower jaws, retina, appendages like fore- and hind limbs, and also the tail including the spinal cord. The regeneration process requires the use of resident stem cells or somatic cells, which have to be reprogrammed. In both cases the reprogrammed cells are less differentiated, meaning the cell would have the ability to form any kind of fetal or adult cell which rose from the three different germ layers, the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. Artificial reprogramming of differentiated mammalian somatic cell had been reported previously. It was shown that four pluripotency factors, OCT4 (also called POU5f1), SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4 are sufficient to generate an induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell. It has been shown that some of these factors are also involved in regenerating processes. In newt limb and lens tissue, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4 mRNA levels were upregulated in the beginning of blastema formation when compared to non-amputated tissue. Oct4 mRNA however, was not detected. During xenopus tail regeneration, Sox2 and c-Myc were expressed, while the xenopus Pou homologs Pou25, Pou60, Pou79, Pou91 were not detected. In regenerating zebrafish fin tissue, Sox2, Pou2, c-Myc and Klf4 mRNA were not upregulated. The mammalian transcription factor OCT4, a class V POU protein, is responsible in maintaining pluripotency in gastrula stage embryos. It was reported that mouse OCT4 is also expressed in the caudal node of embryos having 16 somites. It is further known that progenitors exist in mouse tailbud, which give rise to neural and mesodermal cell lineage. This suggests that the OCT4 expressing cells in caudal node might be a stem cell reservoir. Oct4 was detected in axolotl during embryonic development, and prior to my work we found Oct4 when screening the axolotl blastema cDNA library. In addition, we also identified Pou2, another class V POU gene. Phylogenetic analysis showed a clear distinction of both genes in the axolotl. We determined the mRNA pattern of Pou2 during embryogenesis and compared it to Oct4 mRNA and protein. Both genes are expressed in the primordial germ cells and the pluripotent animal cap region of the embryo. Apart from this similarity, both genes have a different expression pattern in the embryo. We are interested in the involvement of OCT4, POU2, as well as the transcription factor SOX2 in regenerating axolotl spinal cord. We asked whether the cellular pluripotent character conferred by POU factors is limited to mammals or if it is an ancient characteristic of lower vertebrates. To answer the question we performed in vitro and in vivo studies. Hence this thesis is separated into two chapter. By in vitro studies we investigated the pluripotent PouV orthologs from different species. Therefore, we performed reprogramming experiments using mouse or human fibroblasts and transduced them with axolotl Oct4 or Pou2, in combination with human or axolotl Sox2, c-Myc and/or Klf4. The generated iPS cells with the different sets of factors had similar endogenous pluripotency gene expression profiles to embryonic stem cells. Further, iPS cells expressed the pluripotency markers like OCT4, NANOG, SSEA4, TRA1-60 and TRA1-81. Another evaluation of the iPS cells was the formation of embryoid bodies. Immunouorescence staining showed that tissue from all three germ layers was formed after induction. We observed a positive staining for the endoderm marker !-FEROPROTEIN, the mesoderm marker !-SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN and the ectoderm marker \"III TUBULIN in the generated cells. This indicated that the iPS cells generated using axolotl Oct4 and Sox2 in combination with mammalian Klf4 and with or without c-Myc, as well as iPS cell generated with axolotl Pou2 and mammalian Sox2 and Klf4 and with or without c-Myc have a pluripotent potential. In addition, the axolotl factors are able to form heterodimers with the mammalian proteins. Furthermore, we compared the reprogramming ability with POU factors from mouse, human, zebrash, medaka and xenopus. We showed that xenopus Pou91, as the only non-mammalian example, is nearly as efficient as mouse and human Oct4 cDNAs in inducing GFP expressing cells. Also axolotl Pou2, axolotl Oct4 and medaka Pou2 showed reprogramming character however at a much lower efficiency. In contrast, zebrash Pou2 is not able to establish iPS cells. This indicates that a reprogramming ability to a pluripotent cell state is an ancient trait of Pou2 and Oct4 homologs. By in vivo studies we investigated the role of Oct4, Pou2 and Sox2 gene expression in regenerating spinal cord tissue. Performed in situ hybridizations and antibody staining studies in the regenerating spinal cord showed that Oct4, Pou2 and Sox2 were expressed during spinal cord regeneration. Knockdown experiments in regenerating spinal cord using morpholino showed that Pou2-morpholino does not have an effect. In contrast, SOX2 was required for spinal cord regeneration but to a lesser extent, than OCT4, which decreased the regenerated length signicantly compared to control. Even though, with Sox2-morpholino we did not observe the phenotype as a significantly shorter regenerated spinal cord, about 45% of SOX2 knocked down cells were not cycling and proliferating anymore. This indicates that axolotl SOX2 has an effect in regeneration. Therefore we wanted to know whether spinal cord cells would also have a pluripotent character in vivo and form other tissue types. Regenerating cells of the spinal cord are only able to form the same cell type and thus they keep their cell memory. However, when we performed transplantations of OCT4/SOX2 expressing spinal cord cells into somite stage embryos, we could show the formation of muscle cells. This shows that the spinal cord cells have the potential to change their fate in an embryonic context, where the normal environment of spinal cord has changed. However, our data do not indicate whether muscle is formed directly from the spinal cord or whether spinal cord cells fuse to developmental myoblasts, a cell type of embryonic progenitors, which give rise to muscle cells. To clearly state whether regenerating OCT4/SOX2 expressing spinal cord cells are pluripotent we have to perform OCT4 knock down in spinal cord and transplant these less proliferating cells into embryos, observing their cell fate.

Regeneration is a relatively widespread phenomenon in nature, although different organisms exhibit different abilities to reconstitute missing structures. Due to the diversity in the extent of damage the organisms can repair it has been debated for a long time whether those abilities are evolutionary traits that arose independently in multiple organisms or whether they represent a by-product of more basic processes. To date, due to constant increase in the amount of available genomic information this question can be approached by means of comparative genomics by comparing several taxa that have different regenerative capabilities. Two relatively closely related salamander species, newt, Notophthalmus viridescens, and the Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum, offer a unique opportunity to compare two organisms with well-known regenerative capabilities. Despite their importance for regeneration research, relatively little sequence information was available until recently, owing mainly to the large sizes of the respective genomes. In this work I aimed to create a comprehensive transcriptome assembly of the axolotl by sequencing and then assembling the sequence data from a number of tissues and developmental stages. I also incorporated available sequence information that mostly comes from cDNA libraries sequenced previously. I assessed the completeness of the transcriptome by comparing it to a set of available axolotl sequences and found that 96% of those have homologs in the assembly. Additionally, I found that 7,568 of 7,695 protein families common to vertebrates are also represented in the transcriptome. In order to turn the assembly from a merely collection of sequences into a valuable and useful resource for the entire research community I first annotated the sequences, predicted the open reading frames and protein domains and additionally put together multiple bits of information available for each sequence including but not limited to time-course and tissue- specific expression data and in situ hybridization results. The assembly was thereafter made available for the entire axolotl research community through a web portal I developed. Not only does the web portal provide access to the transcriptome data, it is also equipped with an engine for automated data retrieval, which could facilitate automated cross-species bioinformatics analyses. The study crossed the boundary between pure bioinformatics and biology as the transcriptome allowed for computational comparison of the axolotl and the newt in order to identify salamander-specific genes possibly implicated in regeneration and subsequent functional analysis thereof in the lab. Since regeneration closely resembles embryonic development in terms of genes involved in both processes, I first identified approximately 200 homologous contigs in axolotl and newt, which had a predicted open reading frame, but did not have homologs in non-regenerating species. The expression profile of one of those candidate genes suggested that it had a role in regeneration. I studied the molecular function of that gene using CRISPR/Cas system to confirm that it was protein-coding and to create knock-out animals to study the effect of gene knock-down and knock-out. Knock-out animals exhibited significant delays in both, limb development and tail regeneration. The exact mechanism causing this delay is currently being investigated.