1 |
The effectiveness of project training in distributive educationCoakley, Carroll B. January 1968 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliography.
|
2 |
Attitudes of secondary distributive education teacher-coordinators and students toward selected teaching techniques using the semantic differential /Berns, Robert Gary January 1978 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
A study on successful techniques of DECA chapters in competitive events at the district, state and national levelsHuff, Phillip J. January 2003 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
4 |
An Evaluation of Distributive Education in TexasSanford, Charles 08 1900 (has links)
This study was made in an effort to evaluate the need in Texas for Distributive Education--a vocational education for workers in distributive occupations. By the term, distributive occupation, is meant an occupation in which workers are employed in the commercial exchanges necessary for making available to consumers the goods and services produced by others.
|
5 |
LatticesRintala, Richard Arne 08 1900 (has links)
Because lattice theory is so vast, the primary purpose of this paper will be to present some of the general properties of lattices, exhibit examples of lattices, and discuss the properties of distributive and modular lattices.
|
6 |
The influence of politics and institutional position on distributive policiesBonneau, Emily Morgan 29 August 2005 (has links)
Central to the distributive theory is the idea that members of Congress can use
strategic committee assignments to fund pork projects for their districts. Committees
that are primarily constituency service based are considered most susceptible to pork
barrel politics. The Public Works and Transportation Committee, in particular, has
developed a reputation for distributing pork projects. Adler??s (2002) study of six
committees found impressive evidence that members of certain committees are able to
channel disproportionate benefits to their districts??the lone exception was the Public
Works and Transportation Committee. Given the folklore about Public Works and
??pork,?? this result seems odd. In this study, I make two major adjustments to the
research design. First, I isolate the dollars spent on committee programs that were not
allocated by a formula. Formulas have prior built-in controls that are not subject to
bargaining after the formula has been set, and thus are not illustrative of the pork
process. Second, I expand the years studied (1983-1996) and analyze the data with a
pooled cross-section/time series design, which better controls the potential effects of
time on the distribution of federal funds. These modifications do not produce results to
reconcile the conflict with congressional folklore, instead they question the
generalizability of allocation decisions for constituency service committees.
|
7 |
The implementation of 360-degree feedback for high school DECA officersAderhold, Michelle N. January 2001 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
8 |
A follow-up study of the reasons involved in teacher turnover using a sample group of marketing education graduates from 1995-1999Nelson, Richard W. January 2001 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis--PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
9 |
JUSTICE AND THE MORAL COMMUNITYHubin, Donald Clayton January 1978 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Valuing Distributive EqualityBremner, CLAIRE 27 September 2008 (has links)
Distributive equality can be valued in different ways, which can be rendered as definitions of ways to value distributive equality. Those definitions can be used to investigate the value, if any, that distributive equality is held to have by particular principles which regulate distributive shares. Distributive equality can be valued as a matter of justice in two different ways; it can be an intended consequence of a principle of justice and it can be among the grounds for a principle of justice. The definitions of those two ways of valuing distributive equality can be used to investigate the value, if any, that distributive equality is held to have by Rawls’s interpretation of the second principle of justice. Distributive equality can be valued for reasons relating to social relations rather than justice. When distributive equality is valued for reasons relating to social relations, a definition of that way of valuing distributive equality can be specified by reference to the reasons provided. When distributive equality is valued for reasons relating to social relations, the relevance and implications of that way of valuing distributive equality with regard to the prior question of how society should be organized can be investigated by reference to the reasons provided. / Thesis (Master, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2008-09-26 17:06:38.455
|
Page generated in 0.0856 seconds