傳統期刊資訊組織的方式主要是編目與論文索引摘要，今電子期刊由於透過電腦網路的傳遞，也改變其資訊組織與檢索的概念。而資訊組織方式多元，取用多種管道，也造成使用者檢索複雜而多元的環境。 電子期刊提供全文期刊論文帶給學者專家許多便利，而深受使用者喜歡，但電子期刊也面臨多元取用管道與多元資訊組織的局面。電子期刊管理時要處理書目記錄、全文電子檔，以及二者的連結技術；另一方面電子期刊在資訊組織時涵蓋刊名、期數、論文單篇三個層級書目資料，造成電子期刊組織與取用的困難。 本研究透過文獻探討國內外電子期刊資訊組織與取用的相關議題，並透過深度訪談，以了解國內五所大學圖書館和六家廠商電子期刊資訊組織所面臨的問題與解決方法，是否能夠支援電子期刊的取用理論。 根據研究發現，提出結論如下：1.電子期刊的管理新模式；2.電子期刊使用者資訊取用的理論；3.我國圖書館電子期刊的取用管道；4.我國圖書館電子期刊資訊組織與技術；5.整合檢索系統對電子期刊的價值與影響；6.電子期刊取用的管道多元與紛歧；7.電子期刊取用的問題；8.電子期刊資訊組織與技術多元與紛歧；9.電子期刊組織與技術對圖書館帶來的問題。 最後針對前述研究結果提出建議： 對圖書館的建議：1.以使用者導向設計電子期刊的取用管道；2.電子期刊資訊組織與技術要應支援使用者資訊取用模式；3.簡化重整電子期刊管理的作業流程；4.對於維護多套系統的連結，可以採取自動維護或維護一套系統的方式；5.提供電子指定參考書的論文服務，以及電子期刊和數位學習的結合。 對廠商的建議：1.支援使用者中心取用；2.支援圖書館的電子期刊資訊組織；3.了解圖書館管理多套系統的困境，找到適切的方法；4.整合查尋系統可以多加強Portal和整合管理的功能；5.除了研發和銷售新系統，可以幫助圖書館適應新舊系統的過渡期；6.加入更多學術性的期刊，提昇內容權威；7.加強電子期刊回溯年代，解決禁刊問題 / The traditional ways of organizing journals are mainly to cataloge journals, to write abstracts, and to index journal articles. Today, through the transmission of computer network, the electronic journals change the concept of information organization and retrieval. Moreover, the plural forms of information organization and access also causes users to search information in a more complicated multi-environment. It is more convenient that the electronic journals offer the full-text articles to scholars, and users are deeply fond of it. However, the electronic journals meet with the situation of multi-access channels and multi-information organization. On the one hand, the electronic journals deal with the bibliographic records, full-text files, and the linking technology of both. On the other hand, the information organization of electronic journals contains bibliographic materials in three levels of titles, volumes, and articles. All of them cause the difficulty of organizing and using the electronic journals. This study is explored through literary reviews and in-depth interviews in order to understand the problems and solutions associated with electronic journals organization in five university libraries and six vendors in Taiwan and see if they can support the access theory of the electronic journals. Based on the research findings , the conclusions of this study are : 1.a new model of managing the electronic journals is proposed; 2.an User-centered access of the electronic journals theory is presented; 3.the library provides access to electronic journals through channels in Taiwan; 4.e-journals information organization and technology of library in Taiwan is presented; 5. meta-searching systems have the value and influence on the electronic journals; 6. access channels to electronic journals are multiple and fork confusingly; 7.the problems of accessing to electronic journals are studied; 8.there are multiple and confusingly-forked electronic journal information organization and technology; 9.the electronic journals cause the problem of organization and technology to library. Finally, according to the results of the study, several suggestions are provided : For the library: 1.the channel of the electronic journals should meet with the user’s need; 2.the organization and technology of electronic journals should support the user's needs; 3.it is necessary to simplify and reform the management procedure of the electronic journals; 4. the maintenance of the systematic linkages can be automatic or system-by-system.; 5.it should offer the integrating articles with courseware and electronic reserves. For the vendors: 1. they should support user-centered access; 2. they should support the information organization of the electronic journals for the library; 3. they should understand the difficulty of how the libraries manage the predicaments of many systems to find the appropriate solutions.; 4. Meta-searching systems should strengthen the functions of Portal and meta-management; 5.Except for developing and selling the new system, they can help the libraries to get through the transition period from an old system to the new system; 6.they should promote the authority of content in academic electronic journals; 7. the coverage of electronic journals should be enlarged to solve the problem of embargoes.

本研究旨在探討海峽兩岸中文電子期刊系統之現況、系統構面與功能，以及發展動機與成功因素，藉由比較研究之描述、解釋、併排與比較四步驟，研究台灣與大陸電子期刊系統的發展現況、中文期刊與電子期刊發展之優勢與面臨之問題、電子期刊系統發展歷史，並歸納兩岸電子期刊系統建置動機與成功因素，以及藉由實證研究以建構中文電子期刊系統的構面與功能，以提出中文電子期刊系統發展之具體模式與建議。 研究結果確立中文電子期刊系統包含出版管理、使用者服務、營運管理三構面，以及19項功能，並加以歸類。出版管理之功能包含：1.論文徵集；2.數位化作業；3.期刊分類與Metadata建置；4.建置資料庫；5.電子全文管理；6.詞彙權威控制；7.論文篩選標準。使用者服務之功能包含：8.資訊檢索與取用；9.引文分析；10.行銷推廣與客戶服務；11.個人化服務；12.電子期刊永久取用；13.加值服務；14.知識社群。營運管理之功能包含：15.收費與帳務管理；16.權利金給付與查核；17.著作權徵集與管理；18.統計報表；19.營運模式。 本論文結論歸納：1.中文電子期刊系統構面與功能；2.台灣電子期刊系統之特色；3.大陸電子期刊系統之特色;4.台灣中文電子期刊系統發展動機；5.大陸中文電子期刊系統發展動機；6.台灣中文電子期刊系統發展成功因素；7.大陸中文電子期刊系統發展成功因素；8.兩岸中文電子期刊系統發展面臨之問題；9.目前大陸在整體中文電子期刊系統之發展居領先地位。 最後建議：1.依據本論文所提出之電子期刊構面與功能改善台灣中文電子期刊系統。2.建議未來國家圖書館與資料庫廠商合作發展台灣全文電子期刊系統。3.建議我國政府擬定全文電子期刊系統建置之長期重點發展計畫。4.建議台灣電子期刊系統建置期刊採編系統平台。5.建議台灣中文電子期刊系統建置引用文獻連結及引文數據分析功能。6.建議台灣中文電子期刊系統建置知識社群功能。7.建議華藝公司中文電子期刊服務系統以收錄台灣期刊為優先考量。 / The purpose of the study was to research the current status, system dimensions and function, as well as the motivation and success factors of Chinese journal systems. Through description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison, this study research the current status of Chinese journal systems, the advantages of development and the problems of Chinese journals and electronic journals, the history of electronic journal systems, summarized the motivation and success factors of Chinese electronic journal systems, and construct Chinese electronic journal systems dimensions and functions by empirical research. Finally come up with the specific model and suggestions of Chinese electronic journal systems. The results of this study established the Chinese electronic journal systems includes 3 dimensions: management of publication, user services, and management of operation, as well as 19 features. management of publication includes: 1. Collection of journal; 2. Digital operations; 3. Journal classification and Metadata construction; 4. Database construction; 5. Electronic full-text management; 6.Vocabulary authority control; 7. Standard of journal selections. User services include: 8. Information retrieval and access; 9.Citation analysis; 10. Marketing and customer services; 11.Personal services; 12.Permanent access of electronic journals; 13.Value-added services; 14.Knowledge Community. Management of the operation includes: 15.Charges and account management; 16.Premium payments and check; 17. Copyright collection and management; 18. Statistics; 19. Mode of operation. The conclusions of the study are: 1. The dimensions and functions of Chinese electronic journal systems; 2. The characteristics of electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 3. The characteristics of electronic journal systems in China; 4. The motivation of Chinese electronic journal system in Taiwan ; 5. The motivation of Chinese electronic journal system in China; 6.The success factors of Chinese electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 7. The success factors of Chinese electronic journal systems in China; 8. The problems of Chinese electronic journal systems in Taiwan and China; 9. At present, China is on the leading position in overall development of Chinese electronic journal systems.. The study make final suggestions as follows: 1. Pursuant the dimensions and function of electronic journals to improve the Chinese electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 2. National Central Library and database vendors can cooperate to develop full-text electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 3. Government can build long-term development plan of full-text electronic journal systems; 4. The proposed system of electronic journals in Taiwan Journal reporters and editors to build system platform; 5. Construct reference links and citation analysis functions to Chinese electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 6. Build knowledge group functions to Chinese electronic journal systems in Taiwan; 7. CEPS should put the first priority on Taiwan Journal collections.

世界各國政府在知識經濟的潮流之下更加重視本土學術研究的品質，各國投注資源以提升學術研究水準、促進學術社群的國際化。台灣順應此種趨勢，近年制定各種學術政策與評鑑計畫，其中推動學術社群的知識生產品質，是國家政策中既定的一項重點目標。台灣社會學門的知識生產也受到國家施政方向的影響，國家科學委員會於 1997、2001與2006年執行三波的社會學門專業期刊排序計畫，針對社會學門的學術期刊進行評比。 本研究著眼於此種學術場域的改變，將主要的研究關懷聚焦在學術社群的知識變遷；回顧科學社會學的研究傳統，引用行為是探查學社群知識生產的重要指標，引用代表學術知識傳遞與溝通的情形；而近年社會網絡分析（Social Network Analysis） 研究的興起，更擴充知識引用的研究方式與概念，採以引用網絡（Citation Networks） 分析知識結構與社群互動行為。本研究立基於社會網絡的研究概念，利用網絡分析工具試圖捕捉當代台灣社會學知識引用結構的現狀；社會學門的知識引用結構；究竟學術知識的引用會有何種變遷？引用的機制為何？ 本研究採用2007年第三波社會學門專業期刊排序資料，進行次級資料分析，研究問題環繞在2001~2006年引用網絡結構的多層次架構，開展出三項研究問題： （一）社會學門學術期刊引用網絡的現況，互引網絡結構的動態變化為何？ （二）社會學門內部學者引用期刊的情形為何？社會學門各類型期刊的引用變遷又如何？ （三）以社會學門期刊引用的產生是偏向於以內容為主的規範論或符合以社會關係為主的建構論的機制？ 研究結果分成三部份。第一，在期刊對期刊引用網絡層次部份，顯示學術期刊的引用網絡結構朝向集中化的趨勢，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》成為引用結構中主要被引用的學術期刊組織，而且成為引用網絡結構中優勢地位的引用副團體。第二，社會學門學者引用學術期刊的雙元網絡層次，顯示社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者的引用分流；社會學專業期刊與社會工作專業期刊的引用也存在著分流的情形。最後，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》與《台灣社會研究季刊》的社會學者引用機制為內容為主的規範論。此三項結果顯示期刊排序制度施行社會學門的學術期刊，特定學術期刊的學術論文被其他期刊所肯定，產生引用結構的集中化變遷，同時社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者對學科專業期刊分流引用也逐漸成形。而三種學術期刊內，社會學者的引用網絡影響來自於學者專長的相同與否，更是為台灣社會學的知識引用現狀，提出一個解釋的答案。 / Abstract In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly pursuit. Taiwan, as a latecomer to the concept of Knowledge-based Economy, has begun to constitute science and social science rules and evaluations for academic development. The study intends to capture the transformation of the academic field by examining citations. In early works in the science of sociology, citation was an important indication of scholarly productivity. Social network analysis (SNA) enriches the methodology, and makes the indication to the idea of citation networks. Based on the perspective of SNA, the study investigates the citation network database of sociological journals between 2001 and 2006, and the concurrent citation networks of sociologists from three prior sociological journals. The results include three parts: first, the structure of journals' citation networks shows the trend of centralization, and two academic journals attain privileged status by means of structural equivalence. Second, the dual network of authors and journals demonstrate the citation divisions of sociologists and social workers. The sociological professional journals and social worker professional journals also are divided by time. Finally, the citation mechanism of sociologists verifies the normative pattern. In conclusion, the analysis confirms the impact of social science policy, which influences the centralization of citation networks and the advantageous status of specific sociological journals. The sociologists' citation networks are related to the specialty similarities of scholars, not the social relations. The study gives a pioneer explanation of citation networks of Taiwanese sociology.

本研究應用科學計量學方法分析1999年至2008年間，《Science》與《Nature》 期刊文獻之特性，研究樣本取自WOS資料庫，分別計有26,512與27,581篇書目資 料。對內容書目紀錄進行文獻量、年代、出版國別、出版機構、主題類型與關鍵 字、作者數及通訊作者等要項分析。期望本研究結果能提供欲投稿《Science》 與《Nature》研究學者參考，並精準掌握《Science》與《Nature》之發展方向。 / 本研究結果歸納如下：(1)《Science》與《Nature》文獻呈穩定成長，1999 年後其累積成長曲線符合線性成長。(2) 英文為《Science》與《Nature》文獻最 主要之寫作語文。(3) 《Science》與《Nature》主題類型近十年第一名皆為生物 化學與分子生物學，未來研究趨勢可能朝向動物學、環境科學與生態與微生物 學。(4) 《Science》與《Nature》關鍵字第一名皆為表達(Expression)，蛋白質、 進化論、基因與活化作用則在二至五名。(5) 《Science》與《Nature》之參考文 獻數，評述論文平均為62篇及82篇、研究型文章皆為26篇；被引用次數中， 《Science》與《Nature》評述論文平均數分別為212及270次、研究型文章平均為 114及112次。(6) 《Science》與《Nature》研究型文章主要以兩位以上作者為主， 分別佔97%、92%；新聞報導單一作者皆佔了97%，顯示不同性質文獻其合作事 實不同。(7) 《Science》與《Nature》作者機構國別以美國為主，日本為亞洲第 一；台灣則分別排名第31及32名。(8) 大學校院為主導科學學術傳播之重要機 構，哈佛大學、史丹佛大學、柏克萊大學等均名列前茅；台灣地區最具生產力之 研究機構為中央研究院，其次為台灣大學、清華大學、中央大學等。(9) 《Science》 與《Nature》文獻通訊作者主要以第一作者為主，通訊作者與作者排名呈依次減 少之現象。 / 本研究最後依據研究發現之結果，提出以下建議：(1)欲投稿《Science》與 《Nature》期刊之研究人員，應具備英語能力。(2)應改善國內研究環境，提升研 究水準。(3)資料庫製作之精確性有待提升。(4)定期對《Science》與《Nature》 文獻進行分析(5)未來可針對台灣地區之相關文獻進行進一步分析探討。 / This study applies Scientometric Analysis to investigate the characteristics of the journal literature in “Science” and “Nature” during the period 1999-2008. The 26,512 and 27,581 bibliographic records separately retrieved from WOS database are analyzed according to the numbers of literature, publication year, publication country, publishing agencies, subject area and key word, authors, and the reprint author, etc. This study attempts to be the resource for researchers who want to submit papers to “Science" and “Nature” to refer to, and accurately master the development of “Science" and “Nature.” / The results are as follwing: (1) The growth of literature in “Science” and “Nature” is stable, and the cumulated growth curve during 1999-2008 fits linear growth. (2) Most literature in “Science” and “Nature” is written in English. (3) Among this decade, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are the major subject areas in both “Science” and “Nature.” In the future, Zoology, Environmental Science & Ecology, and Microbiology may become the research trend. (4) The most used one of keywords in “Science” and “Nature” is “Expression.” “Protein,” “evolution,” and “gene activation” are ranked within second and fifth. (5) Regarding the numbers of references in “Science" and “Nature,” averagely there are 62 and 82 references individually in review articles, and 26 in research articles. About the numbers of citedness, review articles in “Science” and “Nature" are averagely cited 212 and 270 times individually, and research articles in each journal are cited 114 and 112 times averagely. (6) The research articles in “Science” and “Nature” are mainly completed by two or more authors, 97% and 92% respectively. However, 97% of news reports are written by single author. It indicates that the cooperation situation is different in literature with distinct nature. (7) Both in “Science" and “Nature,” the country of author's affiliation is chiefly America, and Japan occupies number one in Asia. The rank of Taiwan is 31 in “Science” and 32 in “Nature.” (8) University predominates the scholarly communication of science, such as Harvard University, Stanford University, University of California, Berkeley, etc., all among the best. In Taiwan, the most productive institution is Academia Sinica, and followed by National Taiwan University, National Tsing Hua University, and National Central University. (9) The reprint author is mostly the first author, and the relationship between reprint author and the order of authors is corresponding. / According to the research findings, there are five suggestions: (1) To submit papers to “Science” and “Nature,” researchers should have English proficiency. (2) Improve the research environment in Taiwan to enhance research performance. (3) Upgrade the exactness of the production of databases. (4) Analyze the literature in III “Science” and “Nature” regularly. (5) Further examine and explore the relative literature in Taiwan in the future.

本研究主旨在於探討學術期刊普遍禁止一稿多投的現象與其成因。文章中將使用考慮出版者以及學術投稿者的兩階段模型來刻劃投稿、審查，以及投稿規則決策的過程。 初步模型將呈現當投稿者無明顯時間偏好以及各期刊審稿延遲時間一致時，一稿一投或是一稿多投規則對於整體學術產業而言並無差異。其後本文第四章將導入差異審稿延遲所帶來的影響並得出擁有較高聲望的期刊為避免在一稿多投制度下次級期刊利用較快的審查速度奪取較高品質的文章因而將不願意開放一稿多投的結論。 本研究後部分章節將分析各投稿規則對於整體產業福利水準之影響並得到以下結論。一稿一投制度不見得會為整體產業帶來福利增進，但由於投稿者與出版者之間利益不一致性的存在終將難以使得一稿多投成為最後的均衡投稿規則。 / This paper attempts to explore “why the journals in most academic fields like economics refuse to accept Multiple-submission (or simultaneous submission).” In this study, we use a two-stage model involving publishers and academic authors to illustrate the process of submitting, reviewing, and the submission policy determining. The first model shows an indifference result for the whole academic industry to adopt a Sole-submission or a Multiple-submission rule when authors’ utility is time-irrelevant and the reviewing delays of both journals are identical. We latter introduce the effect of differentiated refereeing delay of journals on the authors’ submission behavior in chapter 4 and show that a journal with higher prestige will refuse to adopt multiple submission rule to avoid the possibility that a faster reviewing process may give the less prestigious journal ability to “steal” high quality papers from the more prestigious one under multiple-submission. The welfare is further studied in the later sections. We calculate the overall welfare of the industry and find that even thought the current sole-submission system is not necessarily welfare superior than multiple-submission, it seems that the rigidity of the submission rule is hard to be removed due to the conflicting interests between authors and publishers.

本論文所敘述的是台灣地區雜誌的發展，從日據時代(1895)開始一直 到民國81年。依年代順序，首先敘述各年代的時代背景，包括政治、經濟 與社會文化狀況，以及新聞法規對雜誌事業管制的情形；接著依不同類別 分別介紹該年代新創刊的雜誌。雜誌的介紹雖有詳略的不同，但綜合而言 內容包含下列面向：1.雜誌名稱、刊期、創辦人、發行人、總編輯、主要 成員或撰述人。2.發行宗旨、編輯方針、內容特徵、讀者群。3.雜誌的創 辦經過、主要變遷、影響及貢獻。4.該刊主要成員、撰述人的背景、經歷 及思想觀點。文中所含括的雜誌類別粗分為：書目、政論、黨外雜誌、政 治新聞、社區雜誌、人文•文化•思想、科學、軍事、婦女家庭、廣告、 財經、歷史地理、語文、文學、詩刊、新聞學、兒童、美術、音樂、建築 、電影、電視、廣播、集郵、休閒旅遊等。有幾類的雜誌資料並不是在每 個年代都很完整，但筆者認為雖然有些缺失，仍對膫解台灣地區雜誌事業 的發展有所幫助，因此亦予以簡單介紹。對於當代雜誌的發行與廣告則在 第七章討論，並引用《動腦》雜誌數年來對雜誌印製量及各雜誌廣告量的 調查報告，以窺雜誌發行量與雜誌社營收的真象。附錄內並有金鼎獎的演 變、金鼎獎歷屆得獎雜誌、金鼎獎得獎雜誌次數累計表，以及名詞索引。

本論文以戰後第一代法學期刊為史料，探討1949年至1971年這二十餘年間，民法學的發展與變遷，包括民法學的題材與論證，以及時代背景、司法實務、外國法等等因素的影響。 　　1950年代至1960年代初期的民法學論文，宛如甚而即是教科書抽印本。法學者主觀的認知及其客觀的功能上，期刊論文的任務與教科書相同，均是交代基礎理論。1960年代中期，民法學論文在取材上有些微的轉變，民法學研究者從外國法繼受諸多議題，如公害、生物科技、醫療糾紛、產品責任。 　　民法學論著中，法律論證的總體取向，係探求法律文本的原意，即「民法諸條文構成什麼樣的秩序」。詮釋性議題多源自法條文字的語意性問題，哪些文字的語意有待探究，又受到外國法影響。 　　在方法論上，文義、邏輯，加上比較解釋，幾乎吞沒所有解釋要素。民法學研究者尚無方法論的自覺，對價值與原則的掌握與運用也相當有限。直到1960年代中後期，戰後第二代法學者開始明確指出應保護之利益，惟尚未在所舉案例中，具體衡量當事人的利益。 　　在國共內戰的時代背景下，法律人以「法秩序至上」的觀點看待世界，他們熱烈地談論政治議題，卻對社會議題冷漠。對於前者，法律人僅重申既存法秩序，但後者要求新秩序的創造，法律人無能為力。法律詮釋對秩序的渴求是此一背景的產物，這樣濃厚的政治意味，也使法學各部門受到的關注與其政治色彩成正比，民法學相對不受重視，甚而被邊緣化。 根據當代的標準，當時民法學界與民事審判實務之間，關連薄弱。回應實務見解本非期刊論文的主要題材，實務見解的引述亦多用於佐證，而非為檢討、批評而引用。當時法學界對司法實務的關切，本非檢衡量其適切性，而在提出法規操作的準則；此外，法學界缺乏溝通的平台，法學者缺乏溝通的意願與能力，加上保守的高等教育政策，使外於實務的法學社群既小且弱，難與實務界平行對話。民法學既已邊緣化，相較於刑事法，其取材更為單調。 　　比較法觀點在民法學中佔據支配地位，而此觀點之運用，是法律繼受工程的延續。在論著題材上，為求與外國法的架構對應，期刊論文多按體系切割題材；1960年代中後期，議題取向的論著亦是外國法影響的產物。在法律詮釋上，包括比較法解釋在內的比較法觀點，支配著民法學論文的議題與論證。 　　民法學研究者透過外國法認識本國法，藉由外國法鑑別本國法上的議題，從外國法借來議題，並利用外國法既有的成果，解決本國法各種疑難雜症。但比較法觀點的操作，仍藉助文義與邏輯，價值與理念則退居其次，甚或消失。方法論的貧乏使民法學研究者沒有充分認知本國法，間接致使比較法觀點的誤用。

著電子期刊發展日益成熟，圖書館引進電子期刊館藏蔚為風尚，對圖書館紙本期刊的發展與學術傳播都帶來了巨大的影響。圖書館期刊館藏的改變，也連帶對於使用者的期刊使用造成影響。本研究旨在了解傳播學門教師電子期刊的使用行為，並從使用者的角度探討電子期刊對圖書館館藏發展之影響進而研訂以使用者角度為導向的電子期刊館藏發展政策，以做為未來圖書館館藏發展之參考。 本研究利用問卷調查與深度訪談以了解政大傳播學院教師的資訊行為與電子期刊的使用情形，以及政大傳傳播學院圖書館館藏發展現況、所面臨的問題與困難與對未來館藏發展之看法。最後獲致研究結論如下：(1)傳播學院教師平時的主要任務以教學與研究為主，而資訊需求也多因教學與研究而產生；(2)學術期刊是教師教學與研究的最重要資源；(3)傳播學院教師使用電子期刊甚於紙本期刊；(4)教師對傳播學院圖書分館期刊館藏與服務感到滿意；(5)傳播學院圖書分館重視發展學術期刊館藏，並以西文期刊為館藏重要特色；(6)傳播學院圖書分館期刊館藏發展以電子期刊與紙本期刊並重；(7)傳播學院圖書期刊選購由教師決定，主要考慮期刊內容學術性與教師需求；(8)獲得政大傳播學院圖書分館電子期刊館藏發展要件與程序；(9)傳播學院圖書分館經費有限與典藏空間不足促使電子期刊館藏發展的需求；(10)獲得政大傳播學院圖書館紙本期刊刪訂決策因素；(11)政大傳播學院圖書分館缺乏館藏發展政策訂定；(12)多數教師同意政大傳播學院圖書分館有發展電子期刊之需求；(13)多數教師對於全面發展電子期刊的看法仍有疑慮。 本研究最後針對圖書館電子期刊館藏發展與服務提出以下建議：(1)依據教師使用行為加強電子期刊館藏服務；(2)傳播學院三系所建立期刊選購合作機制；(3)訂定傳播學院圖書分館電子期刊館藏發展政策；(4)加強使用者電子期刊使用教育訓練；(5)強化傳播學院圖書分館館員的功能與價值。 / With the great developments of electronic journals, it becomes a trend for academic libraries to purchase a large amount of electronic resources. Electronic journals bring a lot of impacts on the academic libraries and scholarly communication. The changes on library serials collection also affect the way that faculty use scholarly journals. This research investigated the use of electronic journals among the faculty of Communication at the Cheng-Chi University, and tried to use user-oriented approach to formulate the serials collection development policy. The research conducted at the Cheng-Chi University in 2008 by questionnaire and interviews to exam the use of electronic journals by the faculty of Communication, investigate the status of serials collection in Communication Library, and obtain the faculty and librarians’ viewpoints about the future of serials collection development. The research findings are as follow: (1) The information needs of faculty of communication most came from research and teaching. (2) Scholarly journals are essential resources in the field of communication. (3) Faculty of communication rely on electronic journals than print journals. (4) Faculty are satisfied with the serials collection and services provided by communication library. (5) Communication library set great store by developing academic journals collections and foreign languages journals are features of communication library. (6) Emphasizing electronic journals and print journals equally is the main collection development strategy of communication library. (7) The purchases of journals are decided by faculty, and the technicality and needs of teachers are the two major factors that have great impact on serials selection. (8) Formulate procedures and components of serials collection development for communication library. (9) Shortage of budget and shelving space made communication library has need to develop electronic serials collection. (10) Formulate factors of serials cancellation for communication library. (11) Communication library need to establish collection development policy. (12) A majority of faculty agree that communication library need to develop electronic serials collection. (13) The mostly concerned issue when the library develops the whole electronic journal collection is the electronic archiving. Based on the final results of this research, several suggestions are proposed for improving communication library serials collection development and services are as follow：(1) Strengthen electronic journals collection services based on patterns of journal use by faculty. (2) The college of communication should build cooperation mechanisms for purchasing journals. (3) Communication library should establish electronic serials collection development policy. (4) Enhance training in e-resource use to faculty and students. (5) Strengthen the function and value of librarians in communication library to become the intermedium between main library and faculty.

由於電子資源蓬勃興起，大學圖書館紛紛引進以滿足師生教學研究之需求，然同時預算規模卻未見增加，加以電子資源市場，尤其是電子期刊部份，每年皆以平均7%~10%漲幅成長，使得圖書館對電子期刊使用及其效益，需要有更清楚的了解與掌握，透過衡量網路化服務與資源品質的方法，除可作為圖書館人員決策參考，並能提供有利的理由以尋求經費支援。 本研究目的希能探討電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑相關理論與研究，以ARL E-Metrics計畫為基礎，對大學圖書館電子期刊提出績效評鑑模式芻議與實證分析。採用研究方法為文獻分析法、深度訪談法與電子計量(E-Metrics)分析法，以國立臺灣大學館藏西文電子期刊為對象進行研究。 經訪談與實證資料分析結果，本研究確認了館藏導向電子期刊的績效評鑑的目的、歸納出電子期刊資源與服務評鑑的程序及方法，並建構大學圖書館電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式與要件，包含電子期刊資源、使用、成本與績效四大類型，合計14項指標，同時並獲得具體電子期刊績效評鑑結果，確認國內大學圖書館進行電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式之可行性。 最後，本研究根據結論，建議可以質化方式進行電子期刊評鑑研究，以獲得對電子期刊資源的全面性瞭解，並對電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式與指標、資料蒐集方式等提出建議。而對於未來研究方向，建議可從朝以下四方面努力：(1)進行網路資源與服務導向電子期刊評鑑模式之研究；(2)開發電子期刊使用統計管理軟體；(3)進行電子期刊成本經濟學研究；(4)進行電子期刊使用紀錄分析之評鑑研究。 / Due to the fast growth of electronic resources, it has become a trend for university libraries to acquire such resources to meet the research needs for their users. The expenditures libraries have to spend for electronic resources, especially that for electronic journals have been raised at average rate of 7% to 10% each year. However, the yearly budget for libraries never has been increased as much. It thus has become important for libraries to identify the real usage of and institutional research outcomes from the acquired electronic journals. The assessment of networked information service and resources quality of it is useful for acquisition decision-making. If there is a positive assessment result, then it will also provide justification for seeking budget support. The purpose of this study is to conduct an empirical study so as to enable formulating an assessment model for electronic journals a library has subscribed. The author firstly explores the theories and researches for the application of E-Metrics as assessment model for electronic journals. Taking the ARL E-Metrics project as a referential model, the author combines literature review, in-depth interview, and E-metrics in the research methodology to do researches about the western-language electronic journals subscribed by the National Taiwan University Library. This study has resulted in very useful assessment statistics for electronic journals. From analyzing the data collected from interviews and the related empirical study, the author is able to verify the purpose of assessment for electronic journals under collection development policy, to formulate procedures and methodology for the assessment of electronic journal resource and, the services based on it, to find out necessary components for E-Metrics assessment model for university libraries which comprises of fourteen indicators of four major criteria of (1) e-journal resources (2) its usage (3) its cost and (4) performance from it. The author concludes that the E-Metrics model is good for university libraries to assess their acquired electronic journals. Based on the findings of this study, the author recommends qualitative research to be the more adequate approach for the assessment of electronic journals and proposed the following four areas for future research: (1) investigation of Internet resources and assessment model for electronic journals under the library’s service policy (2) development of statistics and management tools for the subscribed electronic journals (3) cost study of electronic journals from economics point of view (4) analytical study of access logs of electronic journals.

無 / Following an exploration of the CBC’s history and role in Canadian society, this study offers an empirical examination of user generated content (UGC) at cbc.ca measuring the comment type, interactive exchange level, address features and national identity relevance of user comments. The entire comment threads of eleven stories from early 2010 are sampled and content analyzed. Results demonstrate that the vast majority of UGC at cbc.ca is not one-way as opposed to two-wayin nature and that – contrary to the CBC’s historic role – the national discussion is divisive as opposed to unifying. Finally, a discussion of how the CBC could improve its interactive functionalityis presented. Suggestions include recommending that the CBC clearly state the intention for interactive functionality, that the government re-formulate the CBC’s mandate and budget, and, most importantly, that the CBC consider a re-design of its interactive functionality.