Context: Although the long-term goal of antihypertensive therapy is to reduce adverse clinical outcomes, the only way to evaluate the efficacy of treatment in an individual is the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are two drug classes that, by different mechanisms, inhibit the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system that regulates BP. As these drugs are widely prescribed for hypertension, it is essential to determine and compare their effects on BP, heart rate and tolerability. Objectives: 1) To determine the dose-related effect of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on BP, heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE), compared with placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or ≥ DPB 90 mm Hg); and 2) To compare the relative effect on BP, heart rate and WDAE of a) each ACE inhibitor with other ACE inhibitors, b) each ARB with other ARBs, and c) all ACE inhibitors with all ARBs. Methods: Two systematic reviews of published, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor or ARB compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension were conducted. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs and similar trial inclusion criteria and methods of analysis were used in both reviews. Results: Ninety two RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 14 ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157.1/101.2 mm Hg. Forty six RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 9 ARBs in 13 451 participants with a baseline BP of 155.6/101.0 mm Hg. The best estimate of the near maximal trough BP reduction for ACE inhibitors and ARBs was -8/-5 mm Hg and -8/-5 mm Hg, respectively. ACE inhibitors and ARBs do not affect heart rate. The evidence for short-term WDAE (tolerability) was incomplete and weak and did not demonstrate a difference between the two classes of drugs. Conclusion: ACE inhibitors and ARBs are not different individually or as drug classes in BP lowering efficacy.

Context: Although the long-term goal of antihypertensive therapy is to reduce adverse clinical outcomes, the only way to evaluate the efficacy of treatment in an individual is the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are two drug classes that, by different mechanisms, inhibit the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system that regulates BP. As these drugs are widely prescribed for hypertension, it is essential to determine and compare their effects on BP, heart rate and tolerability. Objectives: 1) To determine the dose-related effect of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on BP, heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE), compared with placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or ≥ DPB 90 mm Hg); and 2) To compare the relative effect on BP, heart rate and WDAE of a) each ACE inhibitor with other ACE inhibitors, b) each ARB with other ARBs, and c) all ACE inhibitors with all ARBs. Methods: Two systematic reviews of published, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor or ARB compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension were conducted. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs and similar trial inclusion criteria and methods of analysis were used in both reviews. Results: Ninety two RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 14 ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157.1/101.2 mm Hg. Forty six RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 9 ARBs in 13 451 participants with a baseline BP of 155.6/101.0 mm Hg. The best estimate of the near maximal trough BP reduction for ACE inhibitors and ARBs was -8/-5 mm Hg and -8/-5 mm Hg, respectively. ACE inhibitors and ARBs do not affect heart rate. The evidence for short-term WDAE (tolerability) was incomplete and weak and did not demonstrate a difference between the two classes of drugs. Conclusion: ACE inhibitors and ARBs are not different individually or as drug classes in BP lowering efficacy.

Boston University. University Professors Program Senior theses. / PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. / 2031-01-02

Context: Although the long-term goal of antihypertensive therapy is to reduce adverse clinical outcomes, the only way to evaluate the efficacy of treatment in an individual is the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are two drug classes that, by different mechanisms, inhibit the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system that regulates BP. As these drugs are widely prescribed for hypertension, it is essential to determine and compare their effects on BP, heart rate and tolerability. Objectives: 1) To determine the dose-related effect of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on BP, heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE), compared with placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or ≥ DPB 90 mm Hg); and 2) To compare the relative effect on BP, heart rate and WDAE of a) each ACE inhibitor with other ACE inhibitors, b) each ARB with other ARBs, and c) all ACE inhibitors with all ARBs. Methods: Two systematic reviews of published, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor or ARB compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension were conducted. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs and similar trial inclusion criteria and methods of analysis were used in both reviews. Results: Ninety two RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 14 ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157.1/101.2 mm Hg. Forty six RCTs evaluated the dose-related BP lowering efficacy of 9 ARBs in 13 451 participants with a baseline BP of 155.6/101.0 mm Hg. The best estimate of the near maximal trough BP reduction for ACE inhibitors and ARBs was -8/-5 mm Hg and -8/-5 mm Hg, respectively. ACE inhibitors and ARBs do not affect heart rate. The evidence for short-term WDAE (tolerability) was incomplete and weak and did not demonstrate a difference between the two classes of drugs. Conclusion: ACE inhibitors and ARBs are not different individually or as drug classes in BP lowering efficacy. / Medicine, Faculty of / Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of / Graduate

Background: Amiodarone (AM) is a widely used anti-arrhythmic medication. Its utility is, however, limited by adverse side effects. The mechanism of amiodarone-induced toxicity (APT) in the lungs is attributed primarily to stimulation of the angiotensin enzyme system leading to lung cell apoptosis and cell death. This mechanism has been demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo experimental animal studies. To date, however, no in vivo human studies have confirmed this mechanism for APT. Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine whether angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) offer a protective effect against APT in humans. Demonstration of a protective effect of an ACE-I or ARB would suggest that stimulation of the angiotensin enzyme system may be a key process in APT. Design: An 8-year retrospective analysis of all patients on AM therapy at the James H. Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center was undertaken. Results: A total of 1000 patients on AM were identified. One-hundred-and-seventeen were excluded from the study. Five-hundred-and-twenty-four patients were simultaneously on an ACE-I or ARB. The remaining 359 patients were not. Pulmonary toxicity attributed to AM was identified in five and 14 patients with and without concomitant ACE-I or ARB therapy, respectively. The APT rate for the entire patient sample was 2.2%. APT occurred in 1% of patients on an ACE-I or ARB and in 3.9% of patients not taking an ACE-I or ARB. This observed difference in percentage of APT was statistically significant. Conclusion: The concomitant use of ACE-I or ARB in patients taking AM appears to offer a protective effect against APT. This observation suggests that the stimulation of the angiotensin enzyme system may play an important role in APT in humans.

En France, le syndrome coronaire aigu (SCA) représente environ 100 000 hospitalisations par an. Il est recommandé, en prévention secondaire du SCA, un traitement combinant quatre classes médicamenteuses : bêtabloquants, antiagrégants plaquettaires, statines, et inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion ou antagonistes des récepteurs à l’angiotensine II(combinaison BASI). L’objectif de ce travail était l’étude, en situation réelle de soin et en population générale, de l’utilisation et de l’effectivité de la combinaison thérapeutique recommandée en prévention secondaire du SCA. Nous avons d’abord exploré le potentiel représenté par les bases de données médicoadministratives françaises pour cette évaluation. Nous avons ensuite étudié l’utilisation de la combinaison BASI : 42 % des patients étaient traités par la combinaison BASI en post-SCA et 57 % d’entre eux étaient encore traités à deux ans ; la persistance au traitement était plus faible chez les patients âgés, chez ceux ayant d’autres co-morbidités et chez ceux ayant eu un SCA de nature autre qu’un infarctus du myocarde.Nous avons enfin étudié l’effectivité de la combinaison BASI : la combinaison BASI était la combinaison thérapeutique la plus effective à long terme après un SCA chez les patients avec antécédent d’insuffisance cardiaque ; chez les patients sans antécédent de ce type la combinaison sans bêtabloquants n’était pas associée à une augmentation du risque.Ces résultats permettent de reconsidérer l’intérêt à long terme de l’ensemble de la combinaison BASI en post-SCA chez tous les patients et mettent en avant la nécessité de renforcer les stratégies d’éducation thérapeutique. / Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) causes approximately 100,000 hospitalisations per year in France. In secondary prevention of ACS, guidelines advocate pharmacological treatment combining four drug classes: beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (recommended combination).The aim of this work was to study, in real life and among the general population, the use and the effectiveness of the recommended combination for secondary prevention of ACS.Firstly, we explored the potential represented by the French claims databases in this context. Secondly, we studied the use of the recommended combination: 42% of patients were treated with the recommended combination in post-ACS and 57% of them were still treated two years after; persistence to combination was lower in older patients, in those with other comorbidities and those who had an ACS different of myocardial infarction. Thirdly, we studied the effectiveness of the recommended combination: the recommended combination was the most effective combination therapy at long-term in post-ACS patients with history of heart failure; in patients without such history the combination without betablockers was not associated with an increased risk. These results could help reconsidering the long-term interest of the full recommended combination in all ACS patients and highlight the need to strengthen patient education strategies.