Spelling suggestions: "subject:"binocular disision"" "subject:"binocular decisision""
1 |
Experiments in the control of binocular rivalryLack, Leon C. January 1972 (has links)
vi, 380 leaves : ill. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.1973) from the Dept. of Psychology, University of Adelaide
|
2 |
Experiments in the control of binocular rivalry.Lack, Leon Colburn. January 1972 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D. 1973) from the Dept. of Psychology, University of Adelaide.
|
3 |
Interocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systemsVedamurthy, Indu, Optometry & Vision Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW January 2006 (has links)
The aim of this study was to add to our understanding of interocular interactions in normally sighted children (Group I, N=20), normal adults (Group II, N=20) and adults with anisometropic amblyopia (N=12) by investigating responses to a range of visual functions under three kinds of viewing condition. Visual functions tested were visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity. Stimuli were generated on a Cambridge VSG card driving a high resolution monitor and FE liquid crystal goggles, enabling three kinds of viewing conditions: 1. Monocular (non-tested eye occluded), used as a baseline for most functions. 2. Dichoptic (uniform field presented to the non-tested eye but with a binocular fusion lock). 3. Binocular. In general, binocular performance was better than monocular (binocular summation) but so too was dichoptic performance (dichoptic advantage). However there was much variation within individuals (the three functions showing different summation/advantage pattern) and between individuals. Significant conclusions include: (a) Maturational windows for interocular interactions differ for different spatial visual functions. (b) Interpretations of results from one visual function cannot be applied automatically to other functions. (c) Care must be taken in interpreting results based on 5 or fewer subjects.
|
4 |
The latency of binocular suppression in the EEG of manHammonds, John Edward, 1936- January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Hemiretinal dominance in letter identification.Genesee, Fred. January 1970 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Multiresolution fixation of a binocular vision system /Zheng, Bibo, January 1994 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1994. / Vita. Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 135-139). Also available via the Internet.
|
7 |
Confidence measures for disparity estimates from energy neuron populations /Tsang, Kong Chau. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available in electronic version.
|
8 |
Ocular asymmetries and binocular visionWright, Susan Heather January 1983 (has links)
This study was undertaken to investigate ocular asymmetries in binocular vision using several dichoptic and binocular viewing paradigms. The literature on eye dominance was reviewed and it revealed that little emphasis both theoretically and experimentally had been placed on binocular viewing situations. The nature of the eye dominance tests and the dichotomous classification of the results suggested that one eye's image was competing against the other. The relationship between the different eye-dominance tests was not clear. A new approach to the study of ocular dominance has been developed in this thesis with specific attention to binocular vision and viewing situations. The term eye dominance has been replaced by the term ocular asymmetries to describe the results and measures derived from these procedures and the nature of the binocular visual approach. The experimental work is divided into three sections. Section one, is concerned with a binocular rivalry procedure using real images and afterimages. Section two, involves a stereoscopic viewing procedure and depth discrimination task with selective attenuation of the stereo-displays. Section three, investigates the interocular transfer of the spatial frequency shift. Measures of ocular asymmetry were derived, from all three procedures and the three sets of scores were positively related. This measure gives both the direction and the degree of the ocular asymmetry. The results indicate that ocular asymmetries are a valid feature of binocular vision. The new measure derived from the depth discrimination experiment provides a quantitative and consistent measure of ocular asymmetry. Special attention has been directed at the involvement of eye movements in all three paradigms and as the underlying factor in the asymmetry results. On the basis of the findings it was suggested that the asymmetry may reside in the binocular system controlling eye movements or reflect an asymmetry in processing speeds of the images from the two eyes arriving at the binocular site. The ocular asymmetry measures do not necessarily indicate eye movements are asymmetrical. It is recommended that ocular asymmetry is a variable to be studied in other investigations of binocular vision and binocular interactions.
|
9 |
Hemiretinal dominance in letter identification.Genesee, Fred January 1970 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Binocular fusion /Sheedy, James E. January 1977 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0835 seconds