No description available.

<p>Abstract</p><p>Centro Universitaire UNIVATES is located in the town Lajeado that is situated in the most southerly state, Rio Grande Do Sul, in Brazil. The university has 5000 students, teachers and others staff. UNIVATES is not satisfied with their present wastewater situation and wants to improve it by eliminate the smell caused by the wastewater. They would also like to remove the oil that the storm water brings into the wetland. The high amount of particles in the storm water gives rise to a lot of sediments that eventually will fill up the wetland, and something has to be done about this, if the wetland should continue to be in use. Another aspect to consider is the wish of some people at UNIVATES, for the wetland to be a beautiful and recreational place. All these factors had to be considered, which led to the main question: How can the use of the wetland for wastewater treatment be combined with the request for the wetland to be a beautiful place with the wildlife preserved? </p><p>During the course Wetland Technology that we took before our departure to Brazil, we got introduced to the situation at UNIVATES by Professor André Jasper and Odorico Konrad who visited the course several times. They pointed out that the main issue is the smell from the wastewater and later during the field study at UNIVATES, more information were obtained through discussions, meetings and conversations with the people involved. Several visual inspections were carried out by walking around the wetland. We could determine where and how the inlets and outlets to the wetland were and when it was clear which inlets that brought wastewater and which that brought storm water, the water flow of the wastewater was estimated. Water samples from the wetland were collected at five different sites and analyses of pH, BOD, COD, N-Tot, phosphorus and metals were done by the accredited laboratory at UNIVATES. To test some of our theories, we did a smaller practical experiment that got the name Superficial Filtration Bed. </p><p>The results from the water samples showed the highest BOD, COD, N-Tot and Phosphorus levels in the samples from site 2 and 4 and this reveals that it is wastewater. This was also confirmed by the smell that we felt at these sites during the visual inspections. The results also showed that there is no wastewater coming from site 1, 3 and 5. </p><p>Our final proposal is to create a multifunctional wetland with the purpose to take care of both storm water and wastewater and at the same time work as a research and recreational area. The wetland, which would be divided into two parts, will constitute of all the fundamental functions; storm water buffering, sedimentation basin and biological oil separation and treatment. There will also be research sites and hybrid system for wastewater treatment. The hybrid system will consist of two steps where the first is aerobic and the second both aerobic and anaerobic. The first step is a Superficial Filtration Bed (SFB) and the second a FWS wetland. </p><p>The conclusion of this thesis is that more detailed research is needed to be able to dimension the specific functions correctly. With some further investigations the proposal presented is possible to carry through and our feeling when we left UNIVATES was that the people responsible really liked our ideas. They made it clear that they want to make a change and improve the situation and with the help they have gotten from us, they are a few steps closer to solving the problem.</p>

abstract / Civil Engineering / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Not available / text

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Abstract Centro Universitaire UNIVATES is located in the town Lajeado that is situated in the most southerly state, Rio Grande Do Sul, in Brazil. The university has 5000 students, teachers and others staff. UNIVATES is not satisfied with their present wastewater situation and wants to improve it by eliminate the smell caused by the wastewater. They would also like to remove the oil that the storm water brings into the wetland. The high amount of particles in the storm water gives rise to a lot of sediments that eventually will fill up the wetland, and something has to be done about this, if the wetland should continue to be in use. Another aspect to consider is the wish of some people at UNIVATES, for the wetland to be a beautiful and recreational place. All these factors had to be considered, which led to the main question: How can the use of the wetland for wastewater treatment be combined with the request for the wetland to be a beautiful place with the wildlife preserved? During the course Wetland Technology that we took before our departure to Brazil, we got introduced to the situation at UNIVATES by Professor André Jasper and Odorico Konrad who visited the course several times. They pointed out that the main issue is the smell from the wastewater and later during the field study at UNIVATES, more information were obtained through discussions, meetings and conversations with the people involved. Several visual inspections were carried out by walking around the wetland. We could determine where and how the inlets and outlets to the wetland were and when it was clear which inlets that brought wastewater and which that brought storm water, the water flow of the wastewater was estimated. Water samples from the wetland were collected at five different sites and analyses of pH, BOD, COD, N-Tot, phosphorus and metals were done by the accredited laboratory at UNIVATES. To test some of our theories, we did a smaller practical experiment that got the name Superficial Filtration Bed. The results from the water samples showed the highest BOD, COD, N-Tot and Phosphorus levels in the samples from site 2 and 4 and this reveals that it is wastewater. This was also confirmed by the smell that we felt at these sites during the visual inspections. The results also showed that there is no wastewater coming from site 1, 3 and 5. Our final proposal is to create a multifunctional wetland with the purpose to take care of both storm water and wastewater and at the same time work as a research and recreational area. The wetland, which would be divided into two parts, will constitute of all the fundamental functions; storm water buffering, sedimentation basin and biological oil separation and treatment. There will also be research sites and hybrid system for wastewater treatment. The hybrid system will consist of two steps where the first is aerobic and the second both aerobic and anaerobic. The first step is a Superficial Filtration Bed (SFB) and the second a FWS wetland. The conclusion of this thesis is that more detailed research is needed to be able to dimension the specific functions correctly. With some further investigations the proposal presented is possible to carry through and our feeling when we left UNIVATES was that the people responsible really liked our ideas. They made it clear that they want to make a change and improve the situation and with the help they have gotten from us, they are a few steps closer to solving the problem.

Biological wastewater treatment is typically aerobic and an energy intensive process, mainly due to the required aeration. Alternative sustainable processes are sought, such as Microbial fuel cells (MFC) where electrogenic bacteria can degrade organic matter present in the waste stream while simultaneously generating electricity. MFCs represent an emerging technology which may deliver the capability to reduce the pollution potential of low strength wastewaters (< 1500 mg COD l-1) while generating electricity which could be used to self-power the process. Waste streams high in volatile fatty acids (VFAs) with high conductivity are particularly preferred substrate streams. These may include the effluent from two stage bio-hydrogen and bio-methane systems, which in this study were treated in a four-module tubular MFC (V=1 l) to reduce the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and recover further energy from the substrate. It was shown that the power increased with increasing organic loading rate (0.036-0.572 g sCOD l-1 d-1), but COD removal efficiency decreased. The Coulombic Efficiency (CE) was found to decrease significantly at OLR ˃ 0.6 g sCOD l-1 d-1 and the energy recovery was 92.95 J l-1 (OLR=0.572 g sCOD l-1 d-1). Also, wash-down waters from a chilled food producing company were treated in the same tubular MFC, reducing the soluble COD content by 84.8%. The low power (≈ 30 W m-3) and cell potential (≈ 0.5 V) makes it necessary to investigate methods such as external capacitors, DC/DC converters or serial and parallel connection to improve the power quality. In this thesis, the use of the intrinsic capacitance was tested by switched mode, open and closed circuit (OC/CC) operation of a 2-module tubular MFC with high surface area carbon veil anode. The charge accumulated during OC and released when switched to CC was dependent on the external resistor (R = 100-3 kΩ) and duty cycle. Short period OC/CC switching further increased potential due to the pseudo-capacitance of the reactor, but only at the expense of energy efficiency, compared to continuous operation (CC) under constant load. Another approach to enhance the practical implementation of MFCs is integration with other processes such as reverse electrodialysis to increase MFC’s cell potential or e.g. desalination. In this study a MFC was integrated with supported liquid membrane technology (SLM) for the first time, for the removal of metal ions of wastewater. A three chamber reactor, with a common cathode/feed phase containing 400 mg Zn2+ l-1, enabled V the simultaneous treatment of organic- and heavy metal containing wastewaters. The MFC/SLM combination produces a synergistic effect which enhances the power performance of the MFC significantly; 0.233 mW compared to 0.094 mW in the control. It is shown that the 165±7 mV difference between the MFC/SLM system and the MFC control is partially attributable to the lower cathode pH in the integrated system experiment, the consequent lower activation overpotential and higher oxygen reduction potential. The system demonstrates that within 72 h, 93±4% of the zinc ions are removed from the feed phase. A further study, with continuously operated cathode/feed chamber (100 mg Zn2+ l-1), showed that an enhanced effect on increasing cell potential was possible and could also be maintained in continuous operation.

The principles behind anaerobic digestion are fairly well understood, but the limits of application of each digester design are not known. Because there are significant differences in the properties of the many wastewaters requiring treatment optimal anaerobic digester performance requires the matching of feed characteristics to a digester design and mode of operation. No consensus has yet emerged on digester design, operating conditions or feed/digester match-ups. In this study, three bench scale retained biomass anaerobic digester designs were examined for their response to a sequence of varied hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and influent wastewater concentrations. The digester designs studied were the upflow anaerobic filter, the upflow anaerobic expanded bed and the upflow anaerobic sludge bed. The wastewater was screened and diluted dairy cow manure obtained from the UBC dairy barn. The parameters monitored included the total and soluble chemical oxygen demand (TCOD and SCOD), volatile and suspended solids (VS and SS), total volatile fatty acids (VFAs), total Kjeldahl and ammonia nitrogen (TKN and NH₃-N), pH, biogas production, and the methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (C0₂) content of the biogas. Wastewater treatment efficiencies, measured in terms of TCOD, SCOD, VS, and TVFA removals, and methane productivity and methane yield for each of the digester designs were examined for the range of the operating conditions. The anaerobic filter digester effected a mean TCOD removal efficiency of 47% ± 14% at a mean 4.0 day HRT, 51% ± 9% at a mean 2.3 day HRT and 35% ± 11% at a mean 1.3 day HRT. The expanded bed digester effected a mean TCOD removal of 45% ± 15% at a mean 4.3 day HRT, 38% ± 12% at a mean 2.5 day HRT and 28% ± 9% at a mean 1.3 day HRT. The sludge bed digester effected a mean TCOD removal of 53% ± 9% at a mean 3.8 day HRT, 45% ± 12% at a mean 2.2 day HRT and 32% ± 10% at a mean 1.2 day HRT. For all three digesters, the difference in the treatment efficiency over the range of HRTs tested, from 5 to 1.25 days was not in proportion to the change in HRT. Methane productivity, measured against either the removal or addition of substrate in terms of TCOD, SCOD, VS and TVFA, demonstrated considerable variability. Methane production increased with both substrate addition and substrate removal. Methane yield increased with increasing HRT. The sludge bed digester generally exhibited the greatest but most variable methane yields. It produced 0.095 L CH₄/g VS added at a mean 3.8 day HRT and 0.037 L CH₄/g VS added at a mean 1.2 day HRT. The anaerobic filter delivered the greatest methane yield at the intermediate HRT, 0.044 L CH₄/g VS added at a mean 2.3 day HRT. The expanded bed demonstrated low methane yields over the range of feed strengths and HRTs tested. Biogas composition averaged 62.1% methane and 17.1% carbon dioxide for the anaerobic filter, 43.6% methane and 5.3% carbon dioxide for the expanded bed. and 61.1% methane and 18.9% carbon dioxide for the sludge bed. / Applied Science, Faculty of / Graduate