O presente trabalho teve por objetivo pesquisar os efeitos que as bandas de freqüência espacial alta e baixa têm no reconhecimento de faces em campo visual lateralizado. Foram distribuídos aleatoriamente 40 participantes em dois grupos. Os voluntários observaram 14 fotos de faces sem filtragem até memorizá-las. A seguir foram apresentadas 56 fotos de faces com filtragens de freqüências espaciais, intercaladas aleatoriamente com apresentações de faces não mostradas anteriormente. Cada uma delas foi exibida na tela durante 300 ms mediante a metodologia de apresentação dicótica. O participante devia responder se a face mostrada pertencia ao grupo de fotos inicialmente observado. As freqüências de respostas permitiram calcular as curvas ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) e os parâmetros Az e da preconizado pela Teoria de Detecção de Sinal (MACMILLAN; CREELMAN, 2005) para as faces naturais, faces compostas de freqüências espaciais baixas e faces compostas de freqüências espaciais altas. Os resultados obtidos mostram que as faces Originais foram melhor reconhecidas do que as faces com Freqüências Espaciais Altas (FEA) ou Freqüências Espaciais Baixas (FEB). Ao contrário do achado na literatura, o Hemisfério Esquerdo (HE) teve uma tendência a reconhecer mais eficazmente as faces do que o Hemisfério Direito (HD), independente da condição de filtragem. O HD é igualmente competente do que o HE para processar FEB, mas pior do que o HE para processar FEA. Quanto à performance por gênero, tanto homens quanto mulheres tiveram um desempenho similar quando as faces foram processadas com o HD. O desempenho das mulheres ficou de acordo com a hipótese da FE, pois o reconhecimento que fizeram para as faces com FEA foi melhor do que para as que tinham predomínio de FEB. Os homens, mesmo com o HE, fizeram um reconhecimento melhor das faces com predomínio de FEB do que das faces com FEA. / This study was made with the objective of investigate the effects of high and low spatial frequency bands in face recognition in lateralized visual field. 40 participants were randomly distributed in two groups. The volunteers viewed fourteen non-filtered pictures of faces until they managed to memorize them. After that, fifty six spatial frequency filtered pictures of faces were presented randomly interspersed with pictures of faces previously showed. Each one of them was exhibited in the screen for three hundred milliseconds using the dichotic presentation procedure. The participant should answer whether the face presented belonged to the group of pictures initially viewed. The frequency of responses allowed to calculate the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curves and the Az and da parameters praised by the Signal Detection Theory (Macmillan; Creelman, 2005) for natural faces, low spatial frequency composed faces and high spatial frequency composed faces. Results showed that original faces were better recognized than faces with high spatial frequencies (HSF) and low spatial frequencies (LSF). Differently from literature, the left hemisphere was more accurate than the right to recognize faces, regardless of the filter condition. The RH was equivalent to the LH to process LSF, but worse than the LH to process HSF. Concerning the performance of the genders, men and women judged faces in a very similar way when they used the RH. The performance of women agreed with the FE hypothesis, being faces with HSF recognized better than faces with LSF. Men, even using the LH, were more accurate to recognize faces with LSF than HSF.

This experiment was primarily designed to identify higher cortical correlates of cardiovascular arousal. Low- and high-hostile, right-handed, undergraduate men were identified using the Cook Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS). All participants (N = 30) completed the cold pressor paradigm. Cardiovascular (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure) and electroencephalographic (beta magnitude) data were collected before and after the stressor. As predicted, high-hostiles showed greater increases of heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the stressor relative to low-hostiles. The primary findings of this research include significantly greater beta magnitude recorded by the T3, relative to F7, electrode among low-hostiles. This may suggest that low-hostiles experience left-frontal disinhibition of left-temporal regions, thereby strengthening cardiovascular regulation during the cold-pressor stress. In addition, irrespective of condition, high-hostiles evidenced significantly greater beta magnitude at regions corresponding to the F7 and F8 electrodes. This perhaps suggests that high-hostiles have a relative inability to increase their rostral modulation of posterior systems related to cardiovascular activity/regulation. Low- and high-hostiles did not, however, evidence reliable differences in their ability to monitor cardiovascular arousal to the cold-pressor stress. Findings are discussed in terms of a systems approach, and pertinent future research is recommended. This research did not support the prominent neuropsychological theories of cardiovascular regulation proposed by Heilman et al. (1993) and Tucker and Williamson (1984). Rather, the results may suggest that right- and left-cerebral mechanisms may be primarily responsible for sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular arousal, respectively. / Ph. D.

This investigation was an attempt to replicate and expand previous research which suggested that laterality of electromyographic biofeedback input had a significant effect in lowering frontalis muscle activity. In 1984 Ginn and Harrell conducted a study in which they reported that subjects receiving left ear only audio biofeedback had significantly greater reductions in frontalis muscle activity than those receiving right ear only or both ear feedback. This study was limited to one biofeedback session and subjects were selected based on demonstration of right hand/ear dominance. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the left ear effect reported by Ginn and Harrell could be replicated. Furthermore, the current investigation sought to extend the previous finding to left handed subjects and explore the stability of the effect, if found, by adding a second biofeedback session. Subjects were 96 students recruited from undergraduate psychology classes. They were screened for handedness by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory which resulted in identification of 48 right handers and 48 left handers. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups consisting of left ear feedback, right ear feedback, both ears feedback, and controls. This resulted in eight conditions. Analysis of variance of microvolt changes from baseline found no statistically significant differences between groups. An examination of the rank order of the data reveal a left ear group performance in the same direction as those reported by Ginn and Harrell (1984).

Nous avons étudié la latéralité gestuelle intraspécifique de chimpanzés et de gorilles captifs dans des contextes socio-écologiques proches des conditions naturelles de vie. Nous avons montré que les chimpanzés et les gorilles étudiés présentaient un biais populationnel pour la main droite pour la majorité des gestes les plus fréquents de leur répertoire. Par la mise en oeuvre d’une approche multifactorielle, nous avons montré pour la première fois que la latéralité gestuelle intraspécifique de ces primates était influencée par plusieurs facteurs et par leurs interactions: contexte de l’interaction (champs visuels de l’émetteur et du récepteur et contexte émotionnel), caractéristique du geste (modalité sensorielle, utilisation d'un outil de communication, degré de partage et durée du geste) et par certaines composantes sociodémographiques, particulièrement le rang hiérarchique de l’émetteur et son âge dans une moindre mesure. De plus, nous avons comparé la latéralité manuelle des chimpanzés lors de l'utilisation d'outil pour des actions non-communicatives et des gestes intraspécifiques. Notre analyse multifactorielle suggère que l’utilisation d’outil dans les gestes serait plus contrôlée par l'hémisphère cérébral gauche que l’utilisation d’outil dans des actions non-communicatives. Globalement, nos résultats vérifient le modèle de Ghirlanda et collègues (2009) selon lequel les biais de latéralité au niveau populationnel pourraient être expliqués par une stratégie évolutive stable basée sur les interactions intraspécifiques. Nos résultats sont également en accord avec les études mettant en évidence l'utilisation préférentielle de la main droite pour la communication gestuelle des primates non humains et suggérant que la latéralité gestuelle serait un précurseur de la spécialisation hémisphérique gauche pour le langage. En outre, nos résultats confortent l'hypothèse que certaines espèces de primates pourraient avoir un traitement spécifique de l’hémisphère gauche pour les gestes communicatifs distinct de celui des actions manuelles non-communicatives. Du point de l’évolution, nos résultats soulignent l’importance d’étudier en détail la latéralité intraspécifique en considérant des espèces de différents degrés de socialité et en prenant en compte des contextes socioécologiques proches des conditions naturelles ainsi que de multiples facteurs potentiellement influents. / We studied intraspecific gestural laterality of captive chimpanzees and gorillas in real-life social-ecological relevant contexts. We evidenced that chimpanzees (respectively gorillas) exhibited a right-hand bias at the population level for the majority of the most frequent gestures of their specific natural communication repertoire. By designing and applying a multifactorial approach, we showed for the first time that intraspecific gestural laterality of primates was influenced by several factors and their mutual intertwinement: interactional context (visual fields of both signaller and recipient as well as emotional context), gesture characteristic (sensory modality, use of a communication tool, sharing degree, and gesture duration) and by some socio-demographic components in particular signaller’s hierarchical rank, and to a lesser extent signaller’s age. Similarities but also some discrepancies between chimpanzees and gorillas may be related to the lateralization of emotional processing, to communication strategies, and to social selection pressures related to the social structure and dynamics of the study species. Moreover, we compared manual laterality of tool use by chimpanzees in both non-communication actions and intraspecific gestures. Our multifactorial analysis showed that tool-use in gestures appear to be governed more by the left cerebral hemisphere than tool-use in non-communication actions. Our findings support Ghirlanda and colleagues’ (2009) model postulating that population-level bias could be explained by an evolutionary stable strategy based on intraspecific interactions. Our results also agree with previous reports evidencing predominant right-hand use by nonhuman primates for gestural communication and suggesting that gestural laterality would be a precursor of the left-brain specialization for language. Furthermore, our results support the hypothesis that some primate species may have a specific left-cerebral system processing gestures distinct from the cerebral system processing non-communication manual actions. From an evolutionary point of view, our findings emphasize the importance to study intraspecific laterality in detail by considering species varying in their degree of sociality and taking into account real-life social-ecological contexts and multiple potentially influential factors.

Em humanos, uma série de estudos vem sugerindo que o hemisfério esquerdo é particularmente importante no controle e execução de movimentos. De modo geral, lesões no hemisfério esquerdo promovem déficits motores mais pronunciados que lesões semelhantes no hemisfério direito. Neste trabalho utilizamos a hemisferectomia unilateral para avaliar a contribuição de cada hemisfério na função motora em camundongos. Camundongos Suíços adultos foram submetidos a hemisferectomia unilateral direita (HD) ou esquerda (HE) ou aos procedimentos de controle. Quinze dias após cirurgia, a coordenação motora de cada animal foi avaliada no teste da locomoção forçada em cilindro giratório (Rotarod). A latência para a queda do grupo controle foi significativamente maior que a do grupo HD e não diferiu da do grupo HE. Para auxiliar a interpretação dos resultados obtidos no ROTAROD, uma parte dos animais foi submetida a uma bateria adicional de testes comportamentais na seguinte seqüência: teste de campo aberto, avaliação qualitativa da assimetria sensório-motora, teste da grade elevada e teste de suspensão pela cauda. De modo interessante, no teste da grade elevada, enquanto o grupo HD apresentou o desempenho da pata traseira esquerda (contralateral à lesão) significativamente pior que o da direita, os grupos Controle e HE não apresentaram diferenças entre as duas patas traseiras. De modo análogo ao observado em humanos, nossos resultados sugerem uma ação assimétrica dos hemisférios cerebrais no controle da função motora em camundongos. / A series of studies in humans have suggested that the planning and the control of movements are asymmetrically performed by the hemispheres. In general, lesions in the left hemisphere promote motor deficits that are more pronounced than similar lesions in the right hemisphere. In the present work, we used unilateral hemispherectomy to study the relative importance of each hemisphere in the control of movement in mice. Adult Swiss mice were submitted to right unilateral hemispherectomy (RH) or left unilateral hemispherectomy (LH) and sham surgery. Fifteen days after surgery, the motor coordination of each mouse was evaluated in the forced locomotion in rotating cylinder test (Rotarod). The latency to fall was significantly lower in right-hemispherectomized group as compared to control and did not differ from the left-hemispherectomized group. To help the interpretation of results obtained in the Rotarod test, a part of the sample was subjected to a additional battery of behavioral tests in the following sequence: open field test, qualitative assessment of sensory-motor asymmetry, foot fault test and tail suspension test. Interestingly, in the foot fault test, while the RH group showed significantly worse performance with the left hind limb (contralateral to the lesion) than with the right, the control group and the LH group showed no differences between both hind limbs. Similarly to what is observed in humans, our results suggest that the two hemispheres contribute asymmetrically to control of movement in mice.

Em humanos, uma série de estudos vem sugerindo que o hemisfério esquerdo é particularmente importante no controle e execução de movimentos. De modo geral, lesões no hemisfério esquerdo promovem déficits motores mais pronunciados que lesões semelhantes no hemisfério direito. Neste trabalho utilizamos a hemisferectomia unilateral para avaliar a contribuição de cada hemisfério na função motora em camundongos. Camundongos Suíços adultos foram submetidos a hemisferectomia unilateral direita (HD) ou esquerda (HE) ou aos procedimentos de controle. Quinze dias após cirurgia, a coordenação motora de cada animal foi avaliada no teste da locomoção forçada em cilindro giratório (Rotarod). A latência para a queda do grupo controle foi significativamente maior que a do grupo HD e não diferiu da do grupo HE. Para auxiliar a interpretação dos resultados obtidos no ROTAROD, uma parte dos animais foi submetida a uma bateria adicional de testes comportamentais na seguinte seqüência: teste de campo aberto, avaliação qualitativa da assimetria sensório-motora, teste da grade elevada e teste de suspensão pela cauda. De modo interessante, no teste da grade elevada, enquanto o grupo HD apresentou o desempenho da pata traseira esquerda (contralateral à lesão) significativamente pior que o da direita, os grupos Controle e HE não apresentaram diferenças entre as duas patas traseiras. De modo análogo ao observado em humanos, nossos resultados sugerem uma ação assimétrica dos hemisférios cerebrais no controle da função motora em camundongos. / A series of studies in humans have suggested that the planning and the control of movements are asymmetrically performed by the hemispheres. In general, lesions in the left hemisphere promote motor deficits that are more pronounced than similar lesions in the right hemisphere. In the present work, we used unilateral hemispherectomy to study the relative importance of each hemisphere in the control of movement in mice. Adult Swiss mice were submitted to right unilateral hemispherectomy (RH) or left unilateral hemispherectomy (LH) and sham surgery. Fifteen days after surgery, the motor coordination of each mouse was evaluated in the forced locomotion in rotating cylinder test (Rotarod). The latency to fall was significantly lower in right-hemispherectomized group as compared to control and did not differ from the left-hemispherectomized group. To help the interpretation of results obtained in the Rotarod test, a part of the sample was subjected to a additional battery of behavioral tests in the following sequence: open field test, qualitative assessment of sensory-motor asymmetry, foot fault test and tail suspension test. Interestingly, in the foot fault test, while the RH group showed significantly worse performance with the left hind limb (contralateral to the lesion) than with the right, the control group and the LH group showed no differences between both hind limbs. Similarly to what is observed in humans, our results suggest that the two hemispheres contribute asymmetrically to control of movement in mice.

- / Doctorat en Sciences Psychologiques et de l'éducation / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished