Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-04-25T23:18:51Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DeborahLeiteDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1206544 bytes, checksum: 5b171284ad399f08abe340d4439b26f0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-28T00:19:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 DeborahLeiteDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1206544 bytes, checksum: 5b171284ad399f08abe340d4439b26f0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T00:19:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DeborahLeiteDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1206544 bytes, checksum: 5b171284ad399f08abe340d4439b26f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-19 / A cria??o do Conselho Nacional de Justi?a (CNJ) atrav?s da Emenda Constitucional n? 45/2004, decorreu da constata??o de uma s?rie de lacunas do Poder Judici?rio brasileiro, relacionadas, sobretudo, ? morosidade processual, ? inefetividade das decis?es judiciais, assim como ? falta de mecanismos aptos a viabilizar, de maneira eficaz, a responsabiliza??o disciplinar dos magistrados. O ?rg?o foi concebido constitucionalmente como integrante do Poder Judici?rio, dotado de natureza administrativa e com atribui??es estatu?das no art. 103-B, ? 4? da Constitui??o vigente, dentre as quais se destaca a de editar regulamentos que instrumentalizem a sua atua??o. No entanto, desde que entrou em vigor, a Emenda suscitou amplas discuss?es, atreladas, em especial, ? constitucionalidade do CNJ, o que se deu atrav?s da A??o Direta de Inconstitucionalidade n? 3367, ante a suposta viola??o aos princ?pios da separa??o de poderes e da forma federativa, bem como aos limites do seu poder regulamentar, a exemplo do que fora ventilado na ADI n? 3823/DF, esta versando sobre a Resolu??o n? 07, que disciplinou a veda??o da pr?tica do nepotismo no Poder Judici?rio. Contudo, n?o obstante o Supremo Tribunal Federal j? ter se pronunciado acerca da mat?ria, reconhecendo a constitucionalidade do ?rg?o, assim como da resolu??o suso referida, o debate encontra-se em estado de lat?ncia, podendo novamente eclodir a cada nova manifesta??o regulamentar do CNJ, dada a aus?ncia de conson?ncia entre doutrina e jurisprud?ncia em torno do tratamento constitucional do seu poder regulamentar. Nesse contexto, inegavelmente, a reflex?o acerca da delimita??o do poder regulamentar do CNJ, apresenta-se como extremamente relevante, al?m de atual, em particular, na ambi?ncia do Estado Constitucional de Direito, onde se prima pela seguran?a jur?dica e consolida??o dos institutos normativos. Para que se pudesse chegar a um resultado satisfat?rio, h?bil a solucionar a problem?tica suscitada, o presente estudo analisou as raz?es que ensejaram a cria??o do CNJ, demonstrando a sua imprescindibilidade, como tamb?m buscou caracterizar o seus status de ?rg?o administrativo-constitucional, constatando, enfim, a compatibilidade da sua atua??o regulamentar aos ditames constitucionais. Sob esta perspectiva, foi adotado o m?todo dedutivo e realizada pesquisa de cunho bibliogr?fico e documental. / The creation of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) through the Constitutional Amendment n? 45/2004, derived from countless gaps in Brazilian law, mainly relating to procedural delays, ineffectiveness of judicial decisions, and the lack of mechanisms that enable, effectively, disciplinary accountability of judges. The council is constitutionally designed as a member of the Judiciary, which has administrative nature and laid assignments in art. 103-B, ? 4 of the current Constitution, among which is to edit regulations to instrument its performance. However, since it came into force, the amendment raised extensive discussions, linked in particular to the constitutionality of the CNJ, which was made through the direct action of unconstitutionality n? 3367, against the alleged violation of the principles of separation of powers and federative form, as well as the limits of its regulatory powers, as has fanned out in ADI n? 3823/ DF, this one dealing on Resolution n? 07, which regulates the seal of nepotism practice in the judiciary. However, despite the Supreme Court has already pronounced on the matter, recognizing the constitutionality of the council, as well as the resolution already said, the debate is in a state of latency, and may erupt again with each new manifestation of regulatory CNJ, given the lack of agreement between doctrine and jurisprudence around the constitutional treatment of its regulatory powers. In this context undeniably reflection on the definition of the regulatory power of the CNJ, presents itself as extremely relevant, and current, in particular in the ambience of the Constitutional Rule of Law, where he strives for legal certainty and consolidation of regulatory institutions. So that it could reach a satisfactory result, skilled at resolving the problems raised, the present study analyzed the reasons that gave rise to the creation of the CNJ, demonstrating their indispensability, but also sought to characterize the status of their administrative and constitutional body, noting finally, the compatibility of its regulatory activities to constitutional principles. From this perspective, we adopted the deductive method and carried out research and bibliographic nature documentary.