Purpose and hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to optimize and standardize the following parameters of sweep Visually Evoked Potential (sVEP) in adults: criteria for fitting the regression line to estimate threshold, luminance, electrode placement, temporal frequency, sweep direction, presence of fixation target and stimulus area. The hypothesis is that the parameters chosen will have an impact on the measured visual acuity, contrast threshold and on the number of viable sVEP plots. Methods: The Power Diva software, Version 1.9 was used for this study. Five gold cup active electrodes, one reference electrode and one ground electrode were used to measure the Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Six adult participants (aged 17 to 35 years), with corrected to normal visual acuity and no history of ocular disease took part in each experiment, except for the repeatability experiment in which 3 subjects participated. Four criteria for regression line fitting were compared. Psychophysical thresholds were used to validate the sVEP measures for the different criterion and repeatability of sVEP was estimated for 10 sessions. The effect of luminance (25 cd/m2, 50 cd/m2, 100 cd/m2), electrode placement (Power Diva and ISCEV), temporal frequency (6 Hz, 7.5 Hz, 10 Hz), sweep direction, fixation target and stimulus area were investigated. A repeated measure ANOVA statistical method was used to analyze the average threshold and the number of viable plots out of five active channels for all subjects. Results: Criterion 2 and 3 gave better visual acuity, higher contrast sensitivity, better repeatability and gave results that were closer to the psychophysical threshold than criterion 0 and 1. Luminance of 25 cd/m2 gave significantly fewer viable readings than 50 and 100 cd/m2 while measuring visual acuity (F = 5.11, df = 2, p = 0.0295). Temporal frequency of 7.5 Hz gave significantly more viable readings than 6 and 10 Hz while measuring visual acuity (F = 50.53, df = 2, p < 0.0001) and contrast threshold (F = 9.87, df = 2,p = 0.0043). There was a highly significant interaction of criterion with temporal frequency (F = 1536.98, df = 6, p < 0.0001) while measuring contrast threshold. There was a significant interaction of criterion with sweep direction (F = 4.26, df = 3, p = 0.0231) and for the number of readings (F = 3.75, df = 3, p = 0.0343) while measuring visual acuity. There was an interaction of criterion with sweep direction (F = 4.97, df = 3, p = 0.0136) while measuring contrast threshold at a spatial frequency of 1 cpd. There was a significant effect of fixation target (F = 7.64, df = 1, p = 0.0396) while measuring visual acuity. There was a significant effect of stimulus area (F = 11.78, df = 4, p < 0.0001) on the number of readings while measuring contrast threshold. Conclusion: The sVEP parameters chosen do have a significant effect on visual acuity, contrast threshold and on the number of viable readings. The following parameters are recommended in adults on the basis of results; Criterion 2 or 3 for fitting regression line (C2 - regression line fitted from the signal peak amplitude to the last data point with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) >1; C3 – similar to criterion 2, but the threshold should be within sweep range used), luminance of 50 or 100 cd/m2 , either Power Diva (PD) or International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) electrode placement, temporal frequency of 7.5 Hz, either sweep direction, measurement with the central fixation target, larger stimulus area.

Purpose and hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to optimize and standardize the following parameters of sweep Visually Evoked Potential (sVEP) in adults: criteria for fitting the regression line to estimate threshold, luminance, electrode placement, temporal frequency, sweep direction, presence of fixation target and stimulus area. The hypothesis is that the parameters chosen will have an impact on the measured visual acuity, contrast threshold and on the number of viable sVEP plots. Methods: The Power Diva software, Version 1.9 was used for this study. Five gold cup active electrodes, one reference electrode and one ground electrode were used to measure the Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Six adult participants (aged 17 to 35 years), with corrected to normal visual acuity and no history of ocular disease took part in each experiment, except for the repeatability experiment in which 3 subjects participated. Four criteria for regression line fitting were compared. Psychophysical thresholds were used to validate the sVEP measures for the different criterion and repeatability of sVEP was estimated for 10 sessions. The effect of luminance (25 cd/m2, 50 cd/m2, 100 cd/m2), electrode placement (Power Diva and ISCEV), temporal frequency (6 Hz, 7.5 Hz, 10 Hz), sweep direction, fixation target and stimulus area were investigated. A repeated measure ANOVA statistical method was used to analyze the average threshold and the number of viable plots out of five active channels for all subjects. Results: Criterion 2 and 3 gave better visual acuity, higher contrast sensitivity, better repeatability and gave results that were closer to the psychophysical threshold than criterion 0 and 1. Luminance of 25 cd/m2 gave significantly fewer viable readings than 50 and 100 cd/m2 while measuring visual acuity (F = 5.11, df = 2, p = 0.0295). Temporal frequency of 7.5 Hz gave significantly more viable readings than 6 and 10 Hz while measuring visual acuity (F = 50.53, df = 2, p < 0.0001) and contrast threshold (F = 9.87, df = 2,p = 0.0043). There was a highly significant interaction of criterion with temporal frequency (F = 1536.98, df = 6, p < 0.0001) while measuring contrast threshold. There was a significant interaction of criterion with sweep direction (F = 4.26, df = 3, p = 0.0231) and for the number of readings (F = 3.75, df = 3, p = 0.0343) while measuring visual acuity. There was an interaction of criterion with sweep direction (F = 4.97, df = 3, p = 0.0136) while measuring contrast threshold at a spatial frequency of 1 cpd. There was a significant effect of fixation target (F = 7.64, df = 1, p = 0.0396) while measuring visual acuity. There was a significant effect of stimulus area (F = 11.78, df = 4, p < 0.0001) on the number of readings while measuring contrast threshold. Conclusion: The sVEP parameters chosen do have a significant effect on visual acuity, contrast threshold and on the number of viable readings. The following parameters are recommended in adults on the basis of results; Criterion 2 or 3 for fitting regression line (C2 - regression line fitted from the signal peak amplitude to the last data point with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) >1; C3 – similar to criterion 2, but the threshold should be within sweep range used), luminance of 50 or 100 cd/m2 , either Power Diva (PD) or International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) electrode placement, temporal frequency of 7.5 Hz, either sweep direction, measurement with the central fixation target, larger stimulus area.

Sparkle is a visual texture which appearance basically consists of very bright spots randomly distributed over a darker background. The effect is more apparent to the observer when one of the contributors (sample, observer, illumination) is moved, meaning it is a dynamic effect. While the characterization and measurement of sparkle has been an important topic of research during the past years, the focus has been solely around the static component of it, the dynamic aspect of sparkle has been left out of the discussion. This is somewhat reasonable since the dynamic attribute bases itself on the perception and measurement of static sparkle. The dynamic aspect of sparkle, or “living sparkle” can be described as the variation of its appearance over a given angular distance. Nonetheless, both effects are without doubt related and perhaps together they provide the key to finding the absolute characterization of sparkle. In this work we aim to dive into both aspects. First, the setup of a goniometric system with a color camera was carried out, obtaining a high spatial and angular resolution. Second, measurements of commercial and self-manufactured sample sets were performed, and an analysis algorithm was developed. The algorithm provided a wide range of parameters for different thresholding methods. These methods were put to test when the results were correlated with the visual assessment of a group of 9 samples under one illumination/observation geometry, obtaining the correlation factors for all methods and parameters. The combination of thresholding method and parameter obtained an R2 > 0.9, implying a strong connection with the visual experience. The threshold applied was always fixed at the same value and the parameter (“S_Values”) represented the brightness of the pixels, indicating that the brightness of the sample is the most influential attribute for the perception of sparkle. Then, this same methodology was applied to the rest of the samples in this study (71 total), for the geometries in between 71.2 and 11.2 degrees in 5 degrees steps. The physical parameters of the self-manufactured samples were also used to test the correctness of the algorithm. The results broadly matched the expected values of intensity and particle size. In addition, the algorithm measured the angular variability of the samples though the angular visibility of the sparkle spots. The wider the visible range, the more invariant the sample, and the less apparent the sparkle effect. This work proposes an innovative way of measuring sparkle in its dynamic and static components, a methodology and measurands to do so are proposed and contrasted to visually assessed samples.

Logarithmic sensors are capable of capturing the wide dynamic range of intensities available in nature with minimum number of bits and post-processing required. A simple circuit able to perform logarithmic capture is one utilising a MOS device in weak inversion. However, the output of this pixel is crippled due to fixed pattern noise. Technique proposed to reduce this noise fail to produce high quality images on account of unaccounted high gain variations in the pixel. An electronic calibration technique is proposed which is capable of reducing both multiplicative as well as additive FPN. Contrast properties matching that of human eye are reported from these sensors. With reduced FPN, the pixel performance at low intensities becomes concerning. In these regions, the high leakage current of the CMOS process affects the logarithmic pixel. To reduce this current, two different techniques using a modified circuit and another with modified layout are tested. The layout technique is observed to reduce the leakage current. In addition, this layout can be used to linearise the output of logarithmic pixel in low light regions. The unique linear response at low light and logarithmic pixel at high light is further investigated. A new model based on the device physics is derived to represent this response. The fixed pattern noise profile is also investigated. An intelligent iterative scheme is proposed and verified to extract the photocurrent flowing in the pixel and correct the fixed pattern noise utilising the new model. Future research ideas leading to better designs of logarithmic pixels and post-processing of these signals are proposed at the end of the thesis.