Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1981. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 38-40). Also issued in print.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1981. / Typescript (photocopy). eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 38-40).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1982.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1982.

Thesis (doctoral)--Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. / "Appendix" (p. 45-76) inserted in pocket at end.

Thesis (doctoral)--Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. / "Appendix" (p. 45-76) inserted in pocket at end.

Orientador: Andréa Abi Rached Dantas / Resumo: O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a resistência flexural de materiais restauradores resinosos provisórios (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) após a fotopolimerização com sistema de fotoativação LED-laser: Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). A resistência flexural demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores provisórios Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) foi similar (p >0,05) e maior que a demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). Por outro lado, a resistência flexural apresentada pelo BiFix e Clip F foi semelhante entre si (p > 0.05). Concluimos assim que os materiais Provi Master F, Systemp e Fill Magic são materiais de melhor escolha quando necessitamos de uma resistência maior às forças oclusais. / Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of temporary resin restorative materials (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) after photopolymerization with LED-laser photoactivation system: : Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). The flexural strength demonstrated by the provisional restorative materials Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) was similar (p >0,05) and greater than that demonstrated by restorative materials BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). On the other hand, the flexural strength demonstrated by Be Fil and Clip F were similar among themselves (p > 0.05). We conclude that the materials Provi Master F, Systemp and Fill Magic are materials of better choice when we need a greater resistance to occlusal forces. / Mestre

Submitted by Carolina Ellen Spinola Machado (carolina.machado@unesp.br) on 2018-07-17T17:50:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese Mestrado Carol Spinola Correção Final.pdf: 1288993 bytes, checksum: 2bda3149606dd9c289679698a83d6cbc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Cristina Jorge null (anacris@fclar.unesp.br) on 2018-07-17T18:28:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 machado_ces_me_arafo_int.pdf: 1335157 bytes, checksum: c25b86d1526dd6b3333d99b75d0e04b1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-17T18:28:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 machado_ces_me_arafo_int.pdf: 1335157 bytes, checksum: c25b86d1526dd6b3333d99b75d0e04b1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-05-17 / O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a resistência flexural de materiais restauradores resinosos provisórios (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) após a fotopolimerização com sistema de fotoativação LED-laser: Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). A resistência flexural demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores provisórios Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) foi similar (p >0,05) e maior que a demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). Por outro lado, a resistência flexural apresentada pelo BiFix e Clip F foi semelhante entre si (p > 0.05). Concluimos assim que os materiais Provi Master F, Systemp e Fill Magic são materiais de melhor escolha quando necessitamos de uma resistência maior às forças oclusais. / The objective of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of temporary resin restorative materials (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) after photopolymerization with LED-laser photoactivation system: : Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). The flexural strength demonstrated by the provisional restorative materials Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) was similar (p >0,05) and greater than that demonstrated by restorative materials BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). On the other hand, the flexural strength demonstrated by Be Fil and Clip F were similar among themselves (p > 0.05). We conclude that the materials Provi Master F, Systemp and Fill Magic are materials of better choice when we need a greater resistance to occlusal forces.

Området submarin miljö och dentala förhållanden finns det få studier inom. Detta ger behandlare svårigheter att ta evidensbaserade behandlingsbeslut för grupper som utsätts för hyperbariskt tryck. För att kunna föra fram kvalitativa studier och odontologisk kunskap krävs tillförlitliga metoder. Syfte: Syftet är att utvärdera om den presenterade metoden är tillförlitlig när det gäller att utvärdera exponering för tryck över atmosfärstryck har en inverkan på mikroläckage av temporära restaureringsmaterial. Material och metod: 27 extraherade tänder utan visuella defekter, preparerades under standardiserade former och fyllda med glasjonomermaterial. Dessa objekts rötter kapades och två lager av bonding applicerades som blockering av infärgning. Dessa 27 objekt delades in i 3 grupper trycktes i tryckkammare till 1, 3, respektive 5 bar, liggandes i infärgning med 2% metylenblått. Dessa sektionerades och granskades visuellt enligt binära mätmetoder under förstoringsobjektiv. Resultat: Resultatet var liknande mellan grupperna oavsett utsatt tryck. Samtliga testade objekt visade på permeabilitet i tand-fyllningsgränsen. 77,8-100% av objekten hade infärgningsläckage från dentintubuli via pulpakavum sett till alla grupper. Glasjonomerfyllningar visade ingen mätbar permeabilitet i något objekt. Persisterande glasjonomer-glaze noterades på 55,6-66,6% av testobjekten beroende på testgrupp. Slutsats: Några av faktorerna inkluderade i den presenterade metoden behöver övervägas på nytt och möjligtvis ändras innan en mer tillförlitlig metod för syftet kan etableras. De faktorer som här syftas till är relaterade till termocykling, sektionering av testobjekt, utvärdering av testresultat, blockering av permeabilitet-indikator, mätning av läckage av permeabilitet-indikator, och användning av glasjonomer-glaze. / There are few studies in the area of ​​dental material science concerning submarine environments. This gives practitioners difficulties in making evidence-based decisions in the treatment of the group of patients who are exposed to hyperbaric pressures. In order to carry out qualitative studies and further odontologic knowledge in this field, reliable methods are required. Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the presented method is reliable and accurate in evaluating and measuring micro-leakage of temporary restoration materials exposed to hyperbaric pressures. Materials and methods: 27 extracted teeth without visual defects were prepared under standardized forms and filled with glass ionomer material. The roots of the teeth were cut, and two layers of bonding were applied in the pulpal cavities as blockage for the dye. The teeth were divided into 3 groups, the groups were pressurized to 1, 3 and 5 bar respectively, lying in 2% methylene blue dye. The teeth were sectioned and visually inspected according to binary criteria standards under magnification lens. Results: Similar results irrespective of what pressurized environment they had been subject to were seen. Every test object displayed permeability along both the tooth-filling interface. A high incidence rate(=77,8-100%) of dye permeability via dentinal tubules through the open pulpal cavities was seen in all groups. The glass-ionomer material body showed no significant permeability of the dye for either of the subjects. Persistent glass-ionomer glaze was noted in each group, with an incidence of 55,6-66,6%. Conclusions: Some of the factors included in the presented method need to be reevaluated and perhaps be changed before a more reliable method for the purpose can be established. These considered factors are related to thermal cycling, slicing of test objects, test result evaluation, blockage of permeability indicator, measurement of permeability indicator leakage, and usage of glass-ionomer glaze.

CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of residual temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of indirect composite resin build-ups employing two types of adhesive systems. Thirty non-carious human third molars were selected and the occlusal enamel was removed to produce flat dentin surfaces. The surfaces were coated with provisional restorations fixed with either eugenol-containing temporary cement (Temp Bond), or non-eugenol temporary cement (Freegenol). After one week, the provisional restorations and residual cement were removed with a dental probe and one specimen of each group was selected for evaluation by atomic force microscopy to investigate the presence of remnants of temporary cements. For the control groups, no provisional restorations were made. The dentin surfaces were cleaned with pumice and treated either with a total-etch (TE) adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2) or with a self-etch (SE) adhesive system (Adper Prompt). Composite resin build-ups (Filtek Z250) were fixed to the bonded dentin surfaces using resin luting cement (RelyX ARC). The bonded specimens were then cross-sectioned producing sticks of 0.9 mm2 of adhesive area. Microtensile bond strength testing was perfomed in a universal test machine at a rate of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred. Optical microscopic images and scanning electron micrographs of fractured surfaces were obtained and recorded for fractographic analysis. Bond strength values were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-Student tests to detect significant differences between groups. The results showed a significant reduction on microtensile bond strength values when Temp Bond cement was employed in comparison with the control groups either for TE (p = 0.0331) or SE (p = 0.0267) adhesive systems. Total-etch groups showed significantly higher bond strength values than self-etch groups (p < 0.0001). Optical and scanning electron microscopic analysis revealed a majority of mixed fractures (67%). Adhesive failure at dentin-adhesive interface was significantly higher for SE groups than for TE groups (p = 0.0001). Atomic force microscopic images showed that residues of both temporary cements remained on dentin surfaces even after mechanical cleansing and treatment with acids. Bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems were significantly lowered only when eugenol-containing temporary cement was used prior to bonding and cementation procedures. / O presente estudo experimental in vitro se propÃÂs a investigar a influÃÂncia de resÃÂduos de cimentos provisÃÂrios sobre a resistÃÂncia de uniÃÂo de restauraÃÂÃÂes indiretas de resina composta ÃÂ dentina, empregando-se dois sistemas adesivos resinosos, por meio de ensaio mecÃÂnico de microtraÃÂÃÂo. SuperfÃÂcies planas de dentina foram obtidas a partir da remoÃÂÃÂo do esmalte oclusal de 30 (trinta) dentes terceiros molares humanos sem lesÃÂes de cÃÂrie, extraÃÂdos por indicaÃÂÃÂo cirÃÂrgica ou ortodÃÂntica. Os espÃÂcimes foram distribuÃÂdos em 6 (seis) grupos, de acordo com o tipo de cimento provisÃÂrio e o tipo de sistema adesivo empregado. Discos de resina acrÃÂlica foram fixados ÃÂ superfÃÂcie dentinÃÂria dos espÃÂcimes empregando-se o cimento provisÃÂrio com eugenol Temp Bond ou o cimento sem eugenol Freegenol. ApÃÂs 7 (sete) dias em ÃÂgua destilada a 37ÃÂC, as restauraÃÂÃÂes provisÃÂrias e os resÃÂduos de cimento foram removidos com instrumento manual. Nos grupos-controle, nÃÂo foram empregadas restauraÃÂÃÂes provisÃÂrias. As superfÃÂcies dentinÃÂrias foram limpas com pasta de pedra-pomes e ÃÂgua e tratadas de acordo com o sistema adesivo empregado: condicionamento com ÃÂcido fosfÃÂrico a 37% e aplicaÃÂÃÂo do sistema adesivo Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2) ou aplicaÃÂÃÂo do sistema adesivo autocondicionante Adper Prompt (AP). Em seguida, blocos de resina composta (Filtek Z 250) foram fixados ao substrato dentinÃÂrio utilizando-se um cimento resinoso (RelyX ARC). AtravÃÂs de cortes seriados, foram obtidos corpos-de-prova em forma de palitos com ÃÂrea de interface adesiva de aproximadamente 0,9 mm2 que foram submetidos ao ensaio de microtraÃÂÃÂo em mÃÂquina universal de testes com velocidade de 0,5mm/min atÃÂ a ruptura. A resistÃÂncia adesiva foi expressa pela tensÃÂo de ruptura dos corpos-de-prova. Os modos de fratura das interfaces adesivas foram analisados por microscopia ÃÂptica digital e microscopia eletrÃÂnica de varredura. A presenÃÂa de resÃÂduos dos cimentos provisÃÂrios foi investigada por microscopia de forÃÂa atÃÂmica. Os resultados de resistÃÂncia adesiva foram submetidos ÃÂ anÃÂlise de variÃÂncia (ANOVA) de dois critÃÂrios e teste t-Student para detectar diferenÃÂas significativas entre os grupos. Observou-se uma reduÃÂÃÂo estatisticamente significativa da resistÃÂncia adesiva quando o cimento Temp Bond foi empregado em relaÃÂÃÂo aos grupos-controle, tanto com o sistema adesivo SB2 (p = 0,0331) quanto com o sistema AP (p = 0,0267). Os grupos em que o sistema SB2 foi utilizado apresentaram valores de resistÃÂncia adesiva estatisticamente superiores aos grupos com o sistema AP (p< 0,0001), independentemente do emprego ou nÃÂo de cimentos provisÃÂrios. A anÃÂlise dos modos de fratura mostrou uma maior ocorrÃÂncia de fraturas mistas (67%), sendo que nos grupos com o sistema de condicionamento ÃÂcido total a ocorrÃÂncia de fraturas adesivas na interface dentina-adesivo foi estatisticamente menor que nos grupos com o sistema autocondicionante (p = 0,0001). Com base nesses resultados, concluiu-se que resÃÂduos microscÃÂpicos dos dois cimentos provisÃÂrios permaneceram sobre a superfÃÂcie dentinÃÂria mesmo apÃÂs limpeza mecÃÂnica e tratamento com ÃÂcidos. PorÃÂm, apenas o cimento provisÃÂrio contendo eugenol reduziu significativamente a resistÃÂncia de uniÃÂo ÃÂ dentina das restauraÃÂÃÂes indiretas de resina, independentemente do sistema adesivo empregado.