• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 6
  • Tagged with
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A responsabilidade enunciativa na senten?a judicial condenat?ria

Gomes, Alexandro Teixeira 15 August 2014 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2015-11-26T13:12:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Elisangela Moura (lilaalves@gmail.com) on 2015-11-26T14:23:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T14:23:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / A An?lise Textual dos Discursos tem sua origem no ?mbito da Lingu?stica Textual e se prop?e a estudar a produ??o co(n)textual de sentido fundamentada na an?lise de textos concretos, oferecendo elementos para o entendimento do texto como uma pr?tica discursiva analisado ? luz de determinados planos ou n?veis de an?lise lingu?stica. Nesse sentido, ? nosso prop?sito, nesta investiga??o, estudar o fen?meno da responsabilidade enunciativa na senten?a judicial condenat?ria. Para tanto, seguimos os aportes te?ricos da An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ADAM, 2011) e da Lingu?stica Enunciativa, a partir de v?rios autores, entre eles, Rabatel (2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010), N?lke (2001, 2005, 2009, 2013), N?lke, Fl?ttum e Nor?n (2004), Guentch?va (1994, 1996, 2011) e Guentch?va et al. (1994). Nessa dire??o, investigamos a responsabilidade enunciativa, atrav?s de uma escala que compreende o fen?meno a partir de quatro grada??es, cada uma com um tipo de ponto de vista (PdV) e com elos que podem marcar a assun??o ou o distanciamento do ponto de vista. No que concerne ? abordagem jur?dica da tese, nossa ancoragem te?rica segue v?rios autores, entre eles, Petri (1994), Soto (2001), ?lvarez (2002), Alves (2003), Cornu (2005), Albi (2007), Bittar (2010), Asensio e Polanco (2011), L?pez Samaniego (2006), Montol?o e L?pez Samaniego (2008), Montol?o (2002, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Colares (2010), Prieto (2013), Louren?o e Rodrigues (2013) e Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2014). Nosso corpus se constitui de 13 senten?as condenat?rias provenientes de processos criminais oriundos da comarca de Currais Novos-RN, conclu?dos no ano de 2012. Os resultados revelam como o juiz, a partir de v?rias inst?ncias enunciativas, constr?i a senten?a judicial, o que nos permitiu compreender a configura??o da (n?o) assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa no g?nero discursivo / textual senten?a judicial condenat?ria. Como conclus?es, percebemos que as unidades discursivas s?o perspectivadas ora, a partir da assun??o, ora, a partir da n?o assun??o dos PdV pelas inst?ncias enunciativas, o que orienta a organiza??o argumentativa do produtor do texto e seus prop?sitos comunicativos. Com isso, o juiz cria e/ou modifica valores e cren?as, induz e/ou orienta seu interlocutor podendo demonstrar objetividade e/ou preservar sua face atrav?s de constru??es mediatizadas ou podendo engajar-se pelo dito atrav?s da assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa do conte?do proposicional do enunciado. Pelo exposto, reafirmamos nosso entendimento de que a (n?o) assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa se configura como mecanismo argumentativo fortemente marcado pelo produtor do texto com vistas a seus prop?sitos comunicativos. A senten?a, portanto, constr?i-se nesse jogo de assun??o e/ou n?o assun??o dos enunciados de acordo com a orienta??o argumentativa e com os objetivos do produtor do texto. / The Textual Analysis of Discourse has its origin in Text Linguistics and it aims at studying the co(n)text meaning production based on the analysis of concrete texts by offering elements to the understanding of the text as a discourse practice throughout the plans or levels of linguistic analysis. In this perspective, we intend to investigate the enunciative responsibility phenomenon in the sentencing court judgment. To do so, we review the theoretical contributions of Textual Analysis of Discourse (ADAM, 2011) and the Enunciative Linguistics from various authors, among them, Rabatel (1998, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010), N?lke (2001, 2005, 2009, 2013), N?lke, Fl?ttum and Nor?n (2004), Guentch?va (1994, 1996) and Guentch?va et al. (1994). In this direction, we investigate the enunciative responsibility through a range that comprises the phenomenon from four gradations, each one with a kind of point of view (PoV) and with links that may mark the assumption or the distance from the point of view. Regarding the legal approach of the thesis, our theoretical anchoring follows several authors, among them, Petri (1994), Soto (2001), Alvarez (2002), Alves (2003), Cornu (2005), Albi (2007), Bittar (2010), Asensio and Polanco (2011), L?pez Samaniego (2006), L?pez Montol?o and Samaniego (2008), Montol?o (2002, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Sterling (2010), Prieto (2013), Lawrence and Rodrigues (2013) and Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2014). Our corpus is composed of 13 sentences from criminal cases arising from the district of Currais Novos-RN, completed in 2012. The results reveal how the judge, from various enunciative instances, builds the court decision, which allowed us to understand the configuration of (non) assumption of enunciative responsibility in the sentencing court judgment discourse genre. In conclusion, we perceive that the discourse units are envisaged or through the assumption, or the non assumption of PoV by the enunciative instances, what guides the producer organization argumentative text and his (her) communicative purposes. With that, the judge creates and/or modifies values and beliefs, induces and/or guides his (her) interlocutor by being able to demonstrate objectivity and/or preventing his (her) face through the mediated constructions or engage through the assumption of the enunciative responsibility of the propositional content of an utterance. In short, we reaffirm our belief that the (non) assumption of the enunciative responsibility configures as an argumentative mechanism strongly marked by the producer of the text with a view to their communicative purposes. The sentence, therefore, is constructed in this game of taking and/or not taking of statements according to argumentative orientation and the objectives of the text producer.
2

Os operadores argumentativos como estrat?gia lingu?stica e discursiva da argumenta??o na senten?a judicial

Fonseca, Francisco Geonilson Cunha 02 February 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-16T19:52:06Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-08-17T00:00:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-17T00:00:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-02 / Nesta pesquisa, estudamos a argumenta??o na senten?a judicial, cujo objetivo ? identificar, descrever e explicar o funcionamento dos operadores argumentativos na orienta??o argumentativa do texto e do discurso constru?do por interm?dio do texto da senten?a. Apoiamos nossa pesquisa nos construtos adotados pela An?lise Textual dos Discursos (Adam, 2011) e em Arist?teles (1959), Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996), Soto (2001), Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto e Passeggi (2010), Charaudeau (2012), Trubilhano e Henriques (2013), Keller e Bastos (2015) e outros. Na metodologia, adotamos o m?todo indutivo porque nossos resultados foram obtidos a partir de premissas (ou racioc?nios) particulares, baseadas na experi?ncia passada e presente e testadas na an?lise emp?rica da argumenta??o em um texto escrito, para, ent?o, dizer sobre uma lei geral que rege o fen?meno ou os efeitos dos operadores argumentativos para a orienta??o argumentativa do texto e do discurso. Quanto ? natureza e os objetivos, nossa pesquisa caracterizou-se como qualitativa e como uma investiga??o explicativa e descritiva, com procedimentos t?cnicos de coleta documental pesquisa bibliogr?fica. Como corpus, foi manuseada uma senten?a judicial extra?da do s?tio online da Justi?a Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN), que ? o resultado de uma a??o criminal movida pelo Minist?rio P?blico Federal contra um homem acusado de contrabando de cigarros importados. Trata-se de uma senten?a condenat?ria expedida em 10 de setembro de 2014, pelo juiz L.H.L.B, da 10? Vara Federal, em Mossor?/RN. De forma geral, os resultados revelaram que os operadores argumentativos exerceram papeis decisivos na organiza??o das estrat?gias argumentativas do texto e do discurso, orientando os coenunciadores para a conclus?o desejada pelo enunciador. Foi poss?vel, tamb?m, concluir que a argumenta??o foi constru?da a partir de marcas lingu?sticas e discursivas que mostraram o ponto de vista (PdV) do enunciador, os argumentos que sustentaram esse ponto de vista e as opera??es de racioc?nio l?gico que os operadores argumentativos possibilitaram construir para mostrar que as raz?es que sustentaram os argumentos foram verdadeiras e, portanto, a conclus?o, escolhida pelo enunciador, tamb?m foi a verdadeira. / We studied in this dissertation the argumentation in the court judgment, which goal was to identify, describe and explain the running of argumentative operators in the argumentative orientation of text and discourse built through the text of the judgment. We support our research in the constructs adopted for the ATD ? (Textual Analysis of the Discourses) - Adam (2011), in the studies about the Aristotle?s Rhetoric (1959) and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996) and other works such as of the Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Charaudeau (2012), Keller and Bastos (2015), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto and Passeggi (2010), Trubilhano and Henriques (2013). In a methodological way, we made use of deductive-inductive method, because we analyzed the argumentation in an "unknown" text - particular case - based on a theory already known (about language, text and argumentation). About the nature and objectives, our search was characterized as qualitatively and as an explanatory and descriptive investigation, with technical procedures of documental collection of Bibliographic Search. As corpus, we use a court judgment of character condemnatory, issued on September 10, 2014 and taken from the online site of the Federal Court of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). The results revealed that the argumentative operators exercised decisive roles in the organization of argumentative strategies of the text and the speech , guiding the announcer to the Desired conclusion by the enunciator. It was also possible to conclude that the use of argumentative operators allowed syllogistic constructions in the form of presentation of the arguments and in the construction of argumentation. In addition, operators like "but", "until", "already", "although" etc. helped to identify in the data's analysis the point of view (PoV) of the enunciator, the expectation break about the previous enunciate and / or the value scale given to the argument. Finally, with the use of argumentative operators the enunciator introduced arguments able to demonstrate/justify a thesis and refute an opposing thesis towards a conclusion sought by the own enunciator.
3

Responsabilidade enunciativa no g?nero jur?dico contesta??o

Medeiros, C?lia Maria de 05 December 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-09T18:23:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CeliaMariaDeMedeiros_TESE.pdf: 2112770 bytes, checksum: 878c32dd4637c30aaedd2721251e6d88 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-10T00:26:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CeliaMariaDeMedeiros_TESE.pdf: 2112770 bytes, checksum: 878c32dd4637c30aaedd2721251e6d88 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-10T00:26:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CeliaMariaDeMedeiros_TESE.pdf: 2112770 bytes, checksum: 878c32dd4637c30aaedd2721251e6d88 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-05 / A exemplo dos v?rios dom?nios discursivos, o jur?dico, tamb?m, disp?e de uma pluralidade de g?neros discursivos textuais, os quais podem, igualmente, constituir o objeto de an?lise na interface Linguagem e Direito. Entre os g?neros que circulam no dom?nio em foco, estabelecemos como objetivo geral investigar, nesta tese, o g?nero jur?dico Contesta??o, no que concerne ao fen?meno da responsabilidade enunciativa (RE). Propusemos como objetivos espec?ficos identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar nas se??es ?Das preliminares? e ?Do m?rito?, que compreendem a defesa no plano processual e material da Contesta??o: i) a estrutura composicional e sequencial; ii) os pontos de vistas assumidos pelo locutor enunciador primeiro (L1/E1) e enunciadores segundos (e2); iii) as marcas lingu?sticas que apontam a assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa e/ou um quadro mediativo. A escolha desse g?nero tem sua relev?ncia por ser um g?nero recorrente no processo civil e apresentar caracter?sticas pr?prias com exig?ncias previstas na legisla??o, al?m de possuir car?ter pr?tico. Optamos pela an?lise das se??es Das preliminares e Do m?rito porque nessas partes est?o o n?cleo da narra??o e exposi??o dos argumentos, o uso de discurso citado e, portanto, a entrada de outras vozes (requerente(s), doutrinadores, legisladores, juristas), possibilitando, assim, o estudo das marcas textuais reveladoras de responsabilidade enunciativa. A pesquisa seguiu a metodologia qualitativa do tipo documental, de car?ter qualitativo-interpretativista. O corpus ? constitu?do por 8 (oito) Contesta??es, produzidas por diferentes advogados, as quais foram protocoladas no 2? Juizado Especial C?vel da Zona Sul da Comarca de Natal-RN, no per?odo de 2013 a 2014. As Contesta??es analisadas relacionam-se a temas referentes ao direito do consumidor. Nossa ancoragem te?rica situa-se na abordagem da an?lise textual dos discursos (ATD), enfoque desenvolvido por Adam (2011), que objetiva analisar a produ??o co(n)textual de sentido, fundamentada na an?lise de textos concretos. Essa perspectiva tem como bases te?ricas a lingu?stica textual (LT) e a lingu?stica enunciativa (LE). No que se refere ao ponto de vista (PDV), acompanhamos os estudos de Rabatel (2008, 2008a, 2009, 2015, 2015a) e, para o quadro mediativo, seguimos Guentch?va (1994, 1996, 2011, 2014), uma vez que se constituem como no??es basilares para o tratamento da responsabilidade enunciativa. Quanto ao discurso jur?dico, focalizamos nos estudos de Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2014), Rodrigues (2016b, 2016c), Rodrigues e Passeggi (2016), Louren?o (2008, 2015), Pinto (2010), Gomes (2014), Tullio (2012), Palaia (2010), Cabral (2016), dentre outros. Selecionamos duas categorias de an?lise que, segundo Adam (2011), caracterizam na materialidade textual o grau de RE dos enunciados proposicionais: as modalidades, que s?o determinantes dos locutores, dos enunciadores e dos pontos de vista. Igualmente, a indica??o de quadros mediadores, atrav?s de marcas lingu?sticas que apontam a n?o assun??o da RE. A an?lise dos dados de pesquisa demonstra que na Contesta??o, enquanto g?nero discursivo textual, predomina a sequ?ncia argumentativa, visto que, al?m de ser marca protot?pica do discurso jur?dico, o produtor do texto, ao assumir a RE e utilizar-se dos PDV de outros enunciadores, influencia e estabelece a orienta??o argumentativa do texto. No que se refere ao quadro mediativo, observamos que a entrada de fontes do direito funciona como estrat?gia do que ? dito pelo locutor enunciador primeiro (L1/E1) para assinalar o desengajamento em rela??o ao conte?do proposicional do seu dizer. Nesse sentido, a Contesta??o coloca em evid?ncia dois pontos de vista distintos (autor e r?u), expondo a ades?o do r?u a um ponto de vista que se op?e ao do autor. Isso ocorreu, principalmente, nas se??es ?Da preliminares? e ?Do m?rito?, zonas textuais que apontam, por um lado, enunciadores como respons?veis pelo conte?do proposicional enunciado, por outro lado, enunciadores que n?o se engajaram no que diz respeito ao conte?do proposicional enunciado. / Various fields of discourse, including legal discourse, make use of a variety of discursive, textual genres that can become objects of analysis at the interface between Language and Law. Within these legal genres, in this thesis, our general objective is to investigate the Defense Statement, regarding Commitment. Our specific objectives are to identify, describe, analyze and interpret, the steps, ?Preliminaries? and ?Merits?, which refer to the procedural and material part of the argument of the Defense, observing: i) the composition and sequential structure; ii) the points of view held by the first speaker-enunciator (S1/E1) and second speakers (s2); iii) the linguistic marks that point to assuming Commitment and/or a mediating role. The study of this genre is relevant, as it is an essential genre in civil lawsuits, and presents distinct characteristics advising on legislative mandates, and practical requirements as well. We opt to analyze these steps because they form the nucleus of the narration and exposition of the arguments, the use of the previously mentioned discourse, and therefore, the contain other voices (plaintiffs, legal authors, legislators, jurists), enabling, thus, the study of the textual marks that evidence Commitment. The research is characterized as qualitative, bibliographic, interpretive research. The corpus is comprised of 8 (eight) Defense Statements, produced by different lawyers, which were protocoled at the 2nd Special Civil Court of the South Side in the District of Natal-RN, from 2013 to 2014. The Defenses analyzed relate to consumer rights. The theoretical framework of our study is based on the Textual Discourse Analysis (TDA), developed by Adam (2011), who analyzes the (con)textual production of meaning, through the analysis of authentic texts. This perspective is based on Textual Linguistics (TL) and Enunciative Linguistics (EL). Our perspective on Point of View (POV), is based on the studies of Rabatel (2008, 2008a, 2009, 2015, 2015a), and the framework for mediation is based on Guentch?va (1994, 1996, 2011, 2014), which forms our basic notions for examining Commitment. Regarding the legal discourse, we focus on studies by Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2014), Rodrigues (2016b, 2016c), Rodrigues e Passeggi (2016), Louren?o (2008, 2015), Pinto (2010), Gomes (2014), Tullio (2012), Palaia (2010), Cabral (2016), among others. We selected two categories of analysis that, according to Adam (2011), characterize the degree of the ER of the propositional enunciations, materially in the text: modalities, which are determinants of the speakers, the enunciators and the points of view. Similarly, the indication of mediator profiles, through the linguistic marks that point to not assuming Commitment. The research data analysis shows that in the Defense Statement, as a discursive textual genre, the argument sequence predominates, since, besides being a prototypical mark of legal discourse, the producer of the text, on assuming ER and using the POV of other enunciators, influences and establishes the direction of the argument in the text. Regarding the mediating profile, we observe that the use of legal sources functions as a strategy of what is said by the speaker-enunciator (S1/E1) to assign the disengagement in relation to the propositional content of his or her speech. In this sense, the Defense presents two distinct points of view (perpetrator and defendant), exposing the adherence of the defendant to a point of view that is in opposition to the perpetrator. This occurs, mainly, in the sections ?Preliminaries? and ?Merits?, textual zones that point to, on the one hand, enunciators as responsible for the propositional content enunciated, and on the other hand, enunciators that do not engage with respect to the propositional content enunciated.
4

As sequ?ncias narrativas em senten?a judicial

Cardoso, Valter R?gis de Souza 27 January 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-02T21:56:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-06T00:04:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-06T00:04:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01-27 / Neste trabalho, ? luz da An?lise Textual dos Discursos ? abordagem desenvolvida por Adam (2011) ? propomos estudar a estrutura composicional do g?nero senten?a judicial com foco na no??o de plano de texto e de sequ?ncias textuais narrativas que se realizam em seu relat?rio ? parte que cont?m uma esp?cie de sinopse do processo. Com o objetivo principal de analisar como essas sequ?ncias ocorrem, procuramos identificar quais elementos textuais e discursivos s?o utilizados em sua tessitura, descrever esses elementos textuais e os seus encadeamentos na organiza??o das sequ?ncias narrativas, al?m de interpretar o papel dessas sequ?ncias textuais para a estrutura??o e a composi??o do g?nero. De forma mais ampla, nossa pesquisa est? fundamentada nos pressupostos gerais da Lingu?stica Textual em autores como Koch (1997; 1999; 2002; 2004), Koch e Elias (2012; 2013), Marcuschi (2002; 2008; 2012) entre outros. O corpus desta pesquisa ? composto por uma senten?a de natureza criminal, retirada do Banco de Senten?as do site da Justi?a Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). Metodologicamente, essa pesquisa apresenta aspecto documental e se orienta pelos m?todos do racioc?nio indutivo e dedutivo, apresentando um car?ter qualitativo e descritivo. Os resultados mostram que o relat?rio da senten?a n?o se limita apenas a listar ou enumerar as a??es praticadas pelas partes envolvidas no processo, mas possui um alto grau de narrativiza??o, apresentando todos os momentos de uma sequ?ncia narrativa e que, em fun??o das narrativas de n?vel global, existem as narrativas menores, as chamadas narrativas encaixadas, as quais desempenham um importante mecanismo de contextualiza??o e detalhamento de a??es relatadas. / In the present work, under the light of the Textual Discourse Analysis ? approach developed by Adam (2011) ? we propose to study the compositional structure of the genre judicial sentence, with a focus on the notion of text plan and on the narrative textual sequences that materialize in its report ? part that contains a kind of synopsis of the process. With the main objective of analyzing how these sequences occur, we try to identify which textual and discursive elements are used in their structure, to describe these textual elements and their threads in the organization of narrative sequences, besides to interpret the function of these textual sequences for structuring and composition. In a broader sense, this research is grounded on the general propositions of the Text Linguistics in authors like Koch (1997; 1999; 2002; 2004), Koch e Elias (2012; 2013), Marcuschi (2002; 2008; 2012) among others. The corpus of this research is composed of a single sentence of a criminal nature, extracted from the Sentence Database of the Federal Justice of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN) website. Regarding the applied methodology, the present research is of documental nature, whilst guided by an inductive-deductive reasoning and being of a qualitative and descriptive character. Methodologically, this research presents a documentary aspect and is guided by the methods of inductive and deductive reasoning, presenting a qualitative and descriptive character. Results indicate that the sentence report does not limit itself only to the listing and enumerating of the actions put into practice by the concerned parties throughout the legal process, but that it possess a high level of narrativization, displaying all components of a narrative sequence. And, because of the narratives at the global level, there are the smaller narratives, the so-called embedded narratives, which play an important contextualization and detailing mechanism of reported actions.
5

An?lise textual dos discursos: responsabilidade enunciativa no texto jur?dico

Louren?o, Maria das Vit?rias Nunes Silva 21 June 2013 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:07:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaVNSL_TESE.pdf: 2345703 bytes, checksum: 4c4f50d6a66c591dc1230f2452865159 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-21 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / This investigation aims at describing, analyzing and interpreting the Commitment in Initial Petitions, which is a genre circumscribed in the judicial domain. For this purpose, we have chosen sections, facts as found and relevant law , sections of the petition, with the understanding that, in this way, respectively, the narration of events, which gives margin to the propositioning to the judicial action, and the exposition of the law that upholds the author s intention. We base our discussion on the field of Linguistics, more precisely, Textual Discourse Analysis (TDA), whose theoretical basis is derived from Textual Linguistics (TL) and Enunciative Linguistics. We foreground, particularly, the way in which the author of texts, objects of analysis, use discursive strategies that evidence ER. The relevance of this study, then, is in the formation of a critique of the judicial text, as it conceives of a dialogical approach to the point of view, raising not only questions about the way in which a linguistic instance conceives an object of discourse, but also considering questions of language inherent to technical writing and, in this aspect, contributing to the work of those operating in Law about the many ways ER is formed in the body of a petition. We selected two categories to analyze that, according to Adam (2011), characterize the degree of ER in the textual material of the propositional enunciations: the different types of representation of speech and the indications of profile of mediators. In this sense, with this task as an objective, we base our study regarding point of view on Rabatel (2003, 2009a, 2010) with relation to the enunciative approach, including the study of PDV in polyphonic and dialogical theoretical framework to study the ER from different types of speech representations that conceive forms of transmission of discourse and the role of the enunciating subject, mainly the responsibility and the prerogative by the propositional contents. In the same way, intending to study the indications of the mediator profiles, we observed the postulations of Guentch?va (1994, 1996), which develop the notion of mediative grammatical categories, of which permit the linguistic marking of distance and engagement of the enunciator with regard to the information expressed. The methodology we adopted was based on qualitative research, of an interpretive and introspective nature, in light of the fact that his study focuses on processes and strategies underlying language use. The corpus of the research is comprised of Initial Petitions, which gave rise to actions originating in the Civil Court of Currais Novos County RN. The data analysis shows that an object of discourse is always perspective oriented and presents the point of view of one or more enunciators. Consequently, the producer of a text, using the PDV of other enunciators, influences and establishes the argumentative orientation of the text. In the same way, it evidences the relevance of the use of mediated constructions in the judicial text, as they function as strategies attenuated to the responsibility of the producer of the text with what is said, and at the same time points to a discourse of authority through the entrance of the sources of law. Moreover, it reveals the documental and international importance of this practice, at the same time that it exposes the compositional and normative difficulties with regard to legal and linguistic aspects / Esta investiga??o objetiva descrever, analisar e interpretar a Responsabilidade Enunciativa (RE) em Peti??es Iniciais, g?nero discursivo circunscrito ao dom?nio jur?dico. Para tanto, elegemos como objeto o estudo das se??es Dos fatos e Da fundamenta??o jur?dica , da peti??o, compreendendo, assim, respectivamente, a narra??o dos eventos, que deu margem ? propositura da a??o judicial, e ? exposi??o do direito que ampara a pretens?o da parte autora. Ancoramos a discuss?o no campo da Lingu?stica, mais precisamente, na An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD), cujas bases te?ricas decorrem da Lingu?stica Textual (LT) e da Lingu?stica Enunciativa. Colocamos em relevo, particularmente, o modo como o autor dos textos, objetos de an?lise, faz uso das estrat?gias discursivas que indicam a RE. Dessa forma, a relev?ncia deste estudo reside na constru??o da cr?tica ao texto jur?dico, pois empreende uma abordagem dial?gica do ponto de vista, suscitando n?o apenas questionamentos sobre a maneira como uma inst?ncia lingu?stica concebe um objeto de discurso, mas tamb?m discutindo as quest?es de linguagem inerentes ? escrita especializada e, nesse aspecto, contribuindo com o trabalho dos operadores do Direito acerca das v?rias maneiras de constru??o da RE no corpo do texto peticional. Selecionamos duas categorias de an?lise que, segundo Adam (2011), caracterizam na materialidade textual o grau de RE dos enunciados proposicionais: os diferentes tipos de representa??o da fala e as indica??es de quadros mediadores. Nesse sentido, objetivando tal tarefa, baseamo-nos nos estudos acerca do ponto de vista realizados por Rabatel (2003, 2009a, 2010) no que concerne ? abordagem enunciativa, inserindo o estudo do PDV no arcabou?o das teorias polif?nicas e dial?gicas para estudar a RE a partir dos diferentes tipos de representa??o da fala que compreendem as formas de transmiss?o do discurso e o papel do sujeito enunciador no tocante ? responsabilidade e ? imputa??o pelos conte?dos proposicionais. Da mesma forma, tencionando estudar as indica??es de quadros mediadores, observamos os postulados de Guentch?va (1994, 1996), que desenvolve a no??o de categoria gramatical do mediativo (MED), a qual permite marcar linguisticamente o distanciamento ou engajamento do enunciador diante das informa??es expressas. No que concerne ? metodologia, adotamos a pesquisa de base qualitativa, de natureza interpretativista e introspectiva, haja vista que este estudo focaliza processos e estrat?gias subjacentes ao uso da linguagem. O corpus da pesquisa ? constitu?do por Peti??es Iniciais, que ensejaram a??es oriundas na Vara C?vel da Comarca de Currais Novos-RN. A an?lise dos dados mostra que um objeto de discurso ? sempre perspectivado e manifesta o ponto de vista de um ou mais enunciadores. Como consequ?ncia, o produtor do texto, ao utilizar-se dos PDV de outros enunciadores, influencia e estabelece a orienta??o argumentativa do texto. Da mesma forma, evidencia a relev?ncia do uso das constru??es mediatizadas no texto jur?dico, pois funcionam como estrat?gias atenuantes da responsabilidade do produtor do texto com o que ? dito, e ao mesmo tempo visa um discurso de autoridade pela entrada das fontes do direito. Ainda, revela a import?ncia documental e interacional dessa pr?tica, ao mesmo tempo que exp?e dificuldades de natureza composicional e normativa no que concerne aos aspectos legais e lingu?sticos
6

A (n?o) assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa em narrativas das senten?as condenat?rias de crimes contra a mulher

Ferreira, Isabel Romena Calixta 06 December 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-20T19:18:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 IsabelRomenaCalixtaFerreira_DISSERT.pdf: 5802244 bytes, checksum: 443b322dfb7b14a8d203f9db47ba93e3 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-21T21:19:26Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 IsabelRomenaCalixtaFerreira_DISSERT.pdf: 5802244 bytes, checksum: 443b322dfb7b14a8d203f9db47ba93e3 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-21T21:19:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IsabelRomenaCalixtaFerreira_DISSERT.pdf: 5802244 bytes, checksum: 443b322dfb7b14a8d203f9db47ba93e3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-06 / Esta disserta??o objetiva identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar a responsabilidade enunciativa (RE) em narrativas de senten?as judiciais condenat?rias, g?nero discursivo textual que finaliza um processo-crime. Para isso, selecionamos tr?s senten?as condenat?rias de s?tios eletr?nicos da internet, relativas aos processos penais dos homic?dios dolosos de mulheres que tiveram repercuss?o nacional. Nosso aporte te?rico est? centrado nos estudos da An?lise Textual dos Discursos (doravante ATD), a qual integra as bases te?ricas da Lingu?stica Textual (LT) e da Lingu?stica Enunciativa. Ao seguirmos os postulados de Adam (2011), consideramos o texto em sua rela??o indissoci?vel com o co(n)texto, com o discurso e com os diversos g?neros discursivos. Para o autor, ?o grau de responsabilidade enunciativa de uma proposi??o ? suscet?vel de ser marcado por um grande n?mero de unidades da l?ngua? (ADAM, 2011, p. 117). Igualmente, o trabalho se fundamenta nos estudos acerca do Ponto de vista (PDV), conforme Rabatel (1997, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2008a, 2009, 2015, 2016), tendo em vista a relev?ncia para os estudos da responsabilidade enunciativa; e nos postulados de Guentch?va (1994, 1996, 2011, 2014) sobre as manifesta??es da categoria do mediativo (MED), cuja organiza??o se d? em torno de tr?s valores fundamentais: (1) fatos relatados, inclusive segundo o ouvir-dizer; (2) fatos inferidos e (3) fatos de surpresa. Nesse sentido, nosso trabalho ? orientado por estudos de autores da Lingu?stica Textual, entre eles, Koch (2004, 2005, 2012), Marcuschi (2005, 2008, 2012), Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), bem como se ancora em estudos de Bakhtin ([1992]1997), sobre os g?neros discursivos e em investiga??es que focalizam o Discurso Jur?dico, dentre as quais se situam Rodrigues (2016, 2016a, 2016b), Louren?o (2013), Gomes (2014) e Cabral (2014, 2016). Em nossa an?lise, trouxemos ? tona os recursos lingu?stico-textuais utilizados pelo autor de cada senten?a, objeto do estudo, como forma de manifesta??o da responsabilidade enunciativa. Os resultados mostraram que os pontos de vista dos L1/E1 e dos e2 os elementos que constituem a responsabilidade enunciativa fazem-se presentes nos discursos dos ju?zes, cuja enuncia??o se constr?i por fundamentos com o objetivo de respaldar suas decis?es acerca dos crimes cometidos pelos r?us. A an?lise do corpus revelou que a constru??o dos PDV pelos ju?zes ? realizada por mecanismos lingu?sticos, os quais revelam que a RE, tanto ? atribu?da pelo L1/E1, assumindo a responsabilidade enunciativa pelo conte?do proposicional ou tomando para si os PDV alheios, como a RE ? imputada a outros enunciadores, entre eles r?u, v?tima e Tribunal do J?ri. / This dissertation aims to identify, describe, analyze and interpret Commitment in court?s judgment sentencing narratives, textual discourse genre that ends a criminal case. For so, we have selected three convictions from Internet sites relating to criminal cases of murders of women who had national repercussions. Our theoretical framework is focused on studies of Textual Analysis of the Discourses (hereinafter TAD), which integrates theoretical basis of Textual Linguistics (TL) and Enunciation Linguistics. As we follow Adam's postulates (2011), we consider the text in its inextricable link with the co(n)text, the speech and academic discursive genres. For the author, ?the degree of commitment of a proposition is likely to be matched by a large number of language units" (ADAM, 2011, p. 117). Likewise, present work is based on studies of Point of View (PDV), like Rabatel's (1997, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2008a, 2009, 2015, 2016), in view of relevance to the study of commitment; and Guentch?va's postulates (1994, 1996, 2011, 2014) on the manifestations of the category of mediative (MED), whose organization revolves around three fundamental values: (1) reported facts, even according to hearsay; (2) inferred facts and (3) surprising facts. In this sense, our work is guided by studies from authors Textual Linguistics, among them Koch (2004, 2005, 2012), Marcuschi (2005, 2008, 2012), Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), so as is anchored in studies of Bakhtin ([1992] 1997), about discursive genres, and investigations that focus on Legal Discourse, among which are situated Rodrigues (2016, 2016b, 2016c), Louren?o (2013), Gomes (2014 ) and Cabral (2014, 2016). In our analysis, we have brought to the fore textual-linguistic resources used by the author of each sentence, object of study as a form of manifestation commitment. Results have shown that the views of L1/E1 and E2, as well as elements of commitment , are always present in the speeches of the judges, whose enunciation is built on foundations in order to justify their decisions about crimes committed by defendants. corpus analysis revealed that construction of the PDV by the judges is carried out by linguistic mechanisms, which reveal that RE is assigned both by L1/E1, taking commitment on by propositional content or taking to itself other people's PDV, like RE is allocated to other enunciators, including defendant, victim and jury.

Page generated in 0.099 seconds