Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2002. / Adviser: David D.W. Wang. Includes bibliographical references.

Issued also as diss., Bonn. / Bibliography: p. [135] 136.

No description available.

Issued also as diss., Bonn. / Bibliography: p. [135] 136.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 1999. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 154-164). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.

Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural history', i.e. to assign (some) novels not to the category of make-believe (creating imaginary worlds which only make sense if certain conventions are accepted), nor that of lying (evoking possible but partial worlds for consolation), but that of guesswork (considering what might have happened in this world).

Thesis--Princeton University. / Photocopy (positive) of typescript, made by University Microfilms. Bibliography: leaves 311-326.

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of St Andrews, May 2008.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Brown University, 2008. / Vita. Advisor : James P. Allen. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 462-508).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tufts University, 2003. / Advisers: Linda Bamber; Sheila Emerson. Submitted to the Dept. of English. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 198-206). Access restricted to members of the Tufts University community. Also available via the World Wide Web;