• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Mechanisms of reproductive interference in seed beetles: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses / マメゾウムシ2種における繁殖干渉の機構:対立仮説の実験的検証

Kyogoku, Daisuke 23 March 2015 (has links)
京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(理学) / 甲第18826号 / 理博第4084号 / 新制||理||1587(附属図書館) / 31777 / 京都大学大学院理学研究科生物科学専攻 / (主査)教授 曽田 貞滋, 准教授 渡辺 勝敏, 教授 高橋 淑子 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Science / Kyoto University / DFAM
2

Factors Determining Heterospecific Mating Success in the Sibling Fruit Fly Species Drosophila Pseudoobscura and D. Persimilis

Kujtan, Lara 08 1900 (has links)
Patterns of heterospecific matings are important to understand in order to learn about speciation. I proposed a classical signal detection model as a representation of heterospecific mating patterns in both sexes. From the model I proposed that males would be able to achieve successive heterospecific mating success, as those males were more similar to conspecifics. I also proposed that restrictive females that rejected heterospecific matings would also be more likely to reject conspecific matings. I used the sibling species Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis to examine heterospecific mating patterns in males and females. I found that males previously accepted as heterospecific mates were more likely to achieve heterospecific matings than males that had previously been rejected as heterospecific mates. This was most likely due to decreased courtship by rejected males. Males rejected heterospecifically but mated conspecifically also were less likely to achieve heterospecific matings than males that had initially been accepted as heterospecific mates. This indicated that the same males were able to achieve successive heterospecific matings, despite rejected males also having had initial mating success. This was again likely influenced by decreased courtship in rejected males. Furthermore, I found that females that rejected heterospecific males were also more likely to reject conspecific males than naive females. There was also a non-significant trend of females that previously accepted heterospecific males were more likely to again accept heterospecific males than females that had previously rejected heterospecific males. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)

Page generated in 0.1196 seconds