Thesis (M.A.)--Rowan University, 2005. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ed. D.)--Illinois State University, 1998. / Title from title page screen, viewed July 3, 2006. Dissertation Committee: Larry McNeal (chair), Elizabeth Lugg, David Blacker, Donald Hackmann, R. Craig Whitlock. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 157-163) and abstract. Also available in print.

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Hamburg, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. XXII-XLIV).

Thesis (doctoral)--Technische Universität, Dresden, 2004. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. [329]-357).

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Rostock, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references.

Originally presented as the author's Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Mainz, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [486]-503) and index.

Magister Legum - LLM / Ireland and the United Kingdom are since 1993 in conflict about a Mox plant at Sellafield, on the Irish Sea. This plant is designed to recycle the plutonium which is produced during the reprocessing of nuclear fuel to reclaim the uranium contained in it. Ireland has tried to contest the British decision to build and operate the Mox plant through all the legal means available. An important request of Ireland was to be more and better informed in order to better contribute to the protection of the marine environment of the Irish Sea. Ireland and the United Kingdom are Member of two important treaties addressing the issue of environmental information: the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR Convention). Ireland has sought a remedy through the procedures of dispute settlement instituted by those two treaties. The Mox Plant Case is therefore very complex, each of these procedures being conducted within the textual confines of the treaties that govern them. In July 2003 the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the OSPAR Convention rejected Ireland’s request to have access to more information about the Mox plant. The procedure introduced by Ireland in October 2001 before an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the UNCLOS is still pending. In this context, waiting for the final decision of this Arbitral Tribunal, the ITLOS ordered in December 2001, as a provisional measure, that Ireland and the United Kingdom must cooperate and exchange information. In November 2003, the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the UNCLOS has suspended the proceedings, waiting for a decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Indeed the European Commission, backing up the position of the United Kingdom, initiated proceedings against Ireland before the ECJ in 2003. The Mox Plant Case illustrates and addresses several predominant matters in international environmental law. Firstly it illustrates the complexity of a system where several treaties between the same parties regulate the same issues. As a consequence in this case not less than four international jurisdictions have been and are still involved in the matter, leading to procedural difficulties. Secondly the Mox Plant Case illustrates the considerable difference of opinion which exists in the area of international environmental law with respect to the meaning and nature of the notion of ‘access to information’, and its relationship to other ancillary and concomitant notions, e. g. ‘collaboration’, ‘cooperation’, ‘participation’, etc., by and amongst states. The meaning of this concept, which is the cause of the dispute, differ depending on the context of treaty within which it is used. / South Africa

No description available.

Orientador: Carlos Alonso Barbosa de Oliveira / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-06T18:05:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Biavaschi_MagdaBarros_D.pdf: 59651202 bytes, checksum: e32c7c96a15f844f0889c5653e6fb400 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 / Resumo: Esta tese busca, em síntese, resgatar os fundamentos do Direito do Trabalho em tempos em que os direitos sociais sofrem forte abalo e em que as instituições republicanas parecem sucumbir à força de um desejo implacável de remover todos os obstáculos ao livre fluxo do capital, à expansão das grandes corporações e do capital financeiro internacional, tendo como foco um país de capitalismo tardio como o Brasil. Com a preocupação de desvendar as principais fontes materiais de um ramo do Direito com princípios e fisionomia própria e de verificar como foram impulsionadas as instituições do Estado aptas a fiscalizá-lo e a concretizá-lo, demonstra que a idéia de que a legislação trabalhista brasileira é cópia da Carta Del Lavoro é insustentável tanto teórica quanto empiricamente. Com ênfase no período de 1930-42, mas com um espectro maior de duração, apresenta uma leitura de um período específico da ¿Era Vargas¿, em que esse Direito se afirmou no Brasil como um estatuto jurídico universal. Procedendo a uma abordagem mais geral do quadro socioeconômico do Brasil de então, busca compreender o papel do Estado na institucionalização das regras sociais de proteção ao trabalho e as razões de sua ação coordenadora ter sido decisiva para que esses direitos e as instituições que os concretizam se criassem, sem que essa abordagem signifique, ao contrário, adesão ao ¿mito da outorga¿ / Doutorado / Economia Social e do Trabalho / Doutor em Desenvolvimento Economico

D.Cur. / The midwife renders a service to assist the individual, family, and\or community to promote, maintain, and restore health during pregnancy, labour and the postpartum period. The nature of the service that the midwife renders is determined by law. The midwife is responsible and accountable for her actions and conduct. It is often expected of the midwife to take responsibility for a patient and to be accountable, although legislation does not support her function. In talking to other midwives and from own experienceit has become clear that the legislation which regulates the practice of the midwife causes confusion and is limiting. As a result of this, midwives sometimes hesitate to act, neglect their duties or act outside their scope of practice. The aims of the study are: • to analyse the legislation which regulates the conduct of the midwife • to propose guidelines for new comprehensive legislation. This study has been conducted in three phases. In phase 1 focus group interviews were used to determine the problems experienced by the midwife. Phase 2 of the study consists of the above mentioned legislation. A survey of available literature is used in the analysis to test the relevance of the legislation. Various problems with the legislation are identified. The legislation causes confusion among midwives, limits her practice and is outdated. In the last phase of the research, guidelines for legislation are formulated in order to resolve the current problems and to prevent the recurrence of problems in future. Recommendations for further research are made.