Thesis (M.S.)--Washington State University, 2003. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on May 27, 2005). Includes bibliographical references (p. 33-38).

Thesis--University of Washington. / Vita. Another copy has number: Thesis 26948. Bibliography: leaves [338]-357.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Dept., South Dakota State University, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available via the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1981. / Vita. Bibliography: leaves [241]-251.

No description available.

This thesis combined data from a trapping and radio-telemetry study of snowshoe hares at Kluane Lake, Yukon from January 1984 through August 1985 with data collected at the same site from 1977-83 (Boutin et al. 1986; Krebs et al. 1986) to examine possible causes for the 10-year cycle in density of snowshoe hares. In Chapter 2 I used data on causes of mortality, from a radio-telemetry study of a cyclic snowshoe hare population during 1978-84, to consider the importance of predation in causing the hare cycle. I found that predation during winter was the largest source of mortality for snowshoe hares during 1978-84. There was a 1-year lag in the response of predation mortality to changing hare density. There was a 2-year lag in the response to changing density of mortality due to causes other than predation. I incorporated this information on causes of mortality into a simulation model, to see whether observed predation mortality can cause changes in density similar to those of a cyclic population. I fitted the predation mortality data to a function in which total predator response consists of a Type II functional response and a delayed density-dependent numerical response. Using a simulation model that predicted mortality rates with this function, I produced 8-11 year cycles within parameter values measured in this study. In Chapter 3 I compared a non-cyclic snowshoe hare population on Jacquot Island in Kluane Lake, with a cyclic population on the mainland, 40 km to the SE. I use trapping data from both mainland and island sites, for a period that included population increase, peak, and decline (1977-85) to test hypotheses of conditions sufficient to cause a hare population cycle. I also presented results from a radio-telemetry study, conducted on both mainland and island during a population low on the mainland (1984-85). The hypothesis that high rates of recruitment followed by low rates of recruitment, is sufficient to cause a cycle was not supported. Data presented was consistent with hypotheses that any one of the following conditions was sufficient to cause the hare cycle: 1. High rates of survival followed by low rates of survival, particularly of juveniles 2. Delayed density-dependent predation 3. Periodic food shortage. / Science, Faculty of / Zoology, Department of / Graduate

Thesis (M.S.)--Ohio State University. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 64-76). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Oregon State University, 1971. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the World Wide Web.

I studied the population delineation, hierarchical habitat selection, home range requirements, and denning habits of barren-ground grizzly bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) in Canada's central Arctic. To meet study goals, I tracked 81 bears equipped with satellite radio-collars in a study area of approximately 235,000 km2, centred 400 km northeast of the city of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. I identified three populations of grizzly bears in the study area using multivariate cluster analysis of movement data and population range analyses. High exchange among population units for both females and males, however, suggest that identified grizzly bear population units cannot be managed independently from one another. I documented highly selective patterns of habitat selection by grizzly bears in a central, 75,000 km2 portion of the study area. Using resource selection functions, I examined habitat selection at the level of the home range (second order selection). Coverage of habitat was determined from Landsat Thematic Mapper scenes. The general pattern was for bears to possess home ranges, relative to the study area, that contained preferential amounts of esker habitat, tussock/hummock successional tundra, lichen veneer, birch seep, and tall shrub riparian areas over other habitat types. I also examined habitat selection at a finer level of selection (third order selection), whereby habitat use was determined from individual satellite telemetry locations and compared to the availability of habitats within home ranges of individual animals. Overall, esker and riparian tall shrub habitats were the most preferred habitats by bears throughout the year. Annual ranges of males ('X' = 7,245 km2) were significantly larger than the annual ranges of females ('X' = 2, 100 km2). Annual ranges are the largest ranges yet reported for grizzly bears in North America. Multiple regression revealed that ranges increased in size as the proportional amount of poor bear habitat in the environment, supplying constant amounts of quality habitats. Compared to the proportional availability of habitat types in the study area, esker habitat was selected more than expected by chance. The majority of bears emerged from their dens in the first week of May. Den entrance occurred primarily in the last two weeks of October.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oklahoma, 1998. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 131-139).