The permitting process is an integral part of the successful expansion of offshore wind and renewable energy in the European Union. Many permit process studies, to date, have focused on limited methods and criteria and have been a comparison of two countries. This thesis was written in collaboration with a steering group’s work on an updated marine synthesis report in the Swedish Energy Agency and Swedish Environmental Protection Agency’s joint research programme, Vindval. It compares the permitting process and its effectiveness in 4 EU countries (Germany, Denmark, Scotland, and Sweden) with special emphasis on the acoustic impacts of wind turbine construction. 6 Key criteria that determine the outcome of a successful permit application were analysed: a) permit process maps b) quantity of actors c) consultation times d) ecological and environmental impact e) “planning vs permitting” and e) handling of acoustic impacts on marine mammals. Sweden’s process was found to be the most cumbersome and ineffective among the 4 countries. Germany, Denmark, and Scotland have streamline processes, in part due to the successful employment of a ‘one-stop-shop’ mechanism. It is recommended that Sweden create a similar, singular, and centralized ‘one-stop-shop’ authority that has the power to dictate permitting processes. If the country is to meet its goal of 100% renewable energy by 2040, permitting policy should include: flexible permitting for rapidly changing technology, endorsement of continuous dialog between authorities, a limit on consultation time, the removal or amendment of municipal vetoes, and have clear demarcation of worthwhile explorable zones reserved for offshore wind.

Onze espèces de mammifères marins vivent toute l’année en Arctique et dépendent de ce milieu marin si particulier. Ces espèces endémiques et uniques au monde se déplacent à grande échelle en traversant plusieurs zones maritimes des huit États côtiers et la haute mer. Toutefois, leurs conditions de vie sont menacées par les effets des changements climatiques et l’accroissement des activités humaines dans la région. Bien qu’il existe des règles juridiques de protection au niveau national, le phénomène de « déplacement » affaiblit leur efficacité. En effet, les mammifères marins ne connaissent pas les délimitations maritimes et sont donc assujettis à des protections variables et potentiellement incohérentes. Il est ainsi nécessaire de trouver une stratégie pour harmoniser les règles nationales et développer de nouvelles normes pour leur protection. L’objectif de ce mémoire est de découvrir si le droit international assure une protection adéquate aux mammifères marins qui se déplacent en Arctique. Cette étude identifie et analyse les forces et les faiblesses de plusieurs instruments juridiquement contraignants et de soft law au contenu général et spécifique. Bien qu’il n’existe aucun texte qui traite des mammifères marins en Arctique purement et simplement, ces instruments juridiques protègent certaines espèces de mammifères marins et certaines parties de la région Arctique. Pourtant, les onze mammifères marins connaissent les mêmes enjeux et forment un tout interdépendant. Les conclusions indiquent d’adopter une approche intégrée et d’opter pour une meilleure collaboration entre les États côtiers qui sont les mieux placés pour protéger ces espèces qui se déplacent en Arctique. / Eleven species of marine mammals live year-around in the Arctic and are dependent on its distinctive marine environment. These unique endemic species, which travel long distances, traverse the different maritime zones of the eight coastal States and cross into the high seas. However, their living conditions and habitats are under threat because of climate change and the expansion of human activity in the region. Although the coastal States have all adopted national legislation and regulations for the protection of marine mammals, the fact of their large scale “movement” weakens the efficacy of those laws. Indeed, marine mammals are the subject of various and potentially inconsistent domestic protections. For this reason, it is necessary to develop strategies to harmonise national measures and to devise new norms of protection. The objective of this thesis is to discover whether international law offers adequate protection to marine mammals that roam across the Arctic region. This study identifies and analyses the strengths and the weaknesses of a number of legally binding and soft law instruments of both a general and specialised nature. Many of the legal instruments target specific Arctic marine mammals or distinct areas of the Arctic region for protection. Yet, the eleven species at the heart of this enquiry are all experiencing the same difficulties and constitute an interconnected whole. The findings herein indicate the need for an integrative approach and for increased cooperation among the Arctic coastal States who are in a unique position to protect these species that roam throughout the Arctic.