Thesis (M. Nursing (Advanced Practice))--University of South Australia, 1995.

Thesis (M. Nurs.)--University of Hong Kong, 2005.

Thesis (M.S.)--Boston University

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the operating room is a convenient optional diagnostic approach. Our objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and study the potential benefits of fine needle aspiration in the operating room. Retrospective review of all intraoperative FNA that were requested and performed by pathologists over 20-month period was carried out. Immediate smears were interpreted by the cytopathology team after staining with Diff Quik stain. All cases were reviewed and correlation with subsequent tissue diagnosis was done. Accuracy was calculated and potential benefits were discussed. The number of aspirates was 32. Adequate material for immediate and final interpretation was achieved in 31 cases (sensitivity 97%). In 20 cases (63%), malignancy was diagnosed while a benign diagnosis was rendered in 12 (37%). All cases had a follow up tissue diagnosis. No false-positive cases were identified (specificity 100%). The information gained from this approach was considered helpful to the surgeons. We concluded that FNA of head and neck masses in the operating room is an accurate and sensitive diagnostic approach. The service provides helpful information to surgeons and is an additional optional diagnostic approach.

A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Nursing Education Johannesburg, June 2017 / Multi-resistant organisms, the involvement of numerous stakeholders in the OR as well as the complex procedural and technical advancements, especially in the private healthcare environment, justifies an evidence based infection prevention quality audit tool for an OR that is comprehensive. The purpose of the study was to develop a comprehensive infection prevention quality audit tool for operating room within a private healthcare environment. A three phased, multi-method study was conducted whereby phase one included the identification of statements in existing audit tools, policies and published articles. This was used to compile concourse statements that were used during phase 2 in the Q-sort data collection method, which allowed stakeholders (scrub- and anaesthetic nurses, CSD Managers, IPC- and OHS Coordinators and surgeons) to indicate what they want to be included in the IPC Audit Tool for operating room. A statement verification was conducted to expand the concepts that enabled the researcher to compile an audit tool. Subject experts and the researcher tested the degree of validity of the audit tool in phase three of the study. A descriptive analysis revealed that the results of the Q-sort event was inconclusive. The subject experts were unable to determine the degree of validity of the audit tool, which forced the researcher to test the audit tool in an OR. A Comprehensive IPC Control Quality Audit Tool was developed. The utilisation of the audit tool in an OR should be a well-planned event. Specific education and training of the multidisciplinary team regarding IPC in the OR should be considered. / MT2017

Thesis (M.Cur.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

Sharps injuries can transmit fatal blood-borne infections to injured health care workers. These blood-borne infections have serious consequences, including long-term illness, disability and death. The operating room is a fast-paced, hazardous working environment, where personnel are constantly exposed to sharps injuries. The psychological aspects of these injuries have received little attention. The emotional impact of a sharps injury can be severe and long lasting, even when a serious infection is not transmitted. Furthermore, according to literature, the mean rates of underreporting sharps injuries vary between twenty two and seventy five percent. The research objectives of this qualitative, explorative and descriptive study were to explore and describe the experiences of operating room personnel in the southern district of the North-West province in South Africa after sharps injuries, to explore and describe the reasons why they do not always report these incidents, to explore and describe what could be done to increase reporting of sharps incidents in operating rooms by personnel and to propose guidelines to support operating room personnel after a sharps injury. In order to achieve these objectives, the researcher gathered data by conducting semi-structured interviews with operating room personnel who had experienced sharps injuries in hospitals of the southern districts of the North-West in South Africa. Ethical considerations were adhered to by the researcher. Permission to conduct research was negotiated by the researcher with management of the hospitals in the target area. Voluntary, informed consent in writing was obtained from all participants before interviews were conducted. Data saturation was reached after 17 interviews were conducted with participants. Data were analysed with the help of an experienced co-coder. The researcher and co-coder reached consensus during a meeting organised for the purpose. Then the data were related to relevant literature. Seven categories emerged from the data analysis: Mechanisms of sharps injuries in the operating room, practical measures taken after a sharps injury, reasons for not reporting all sharps injuries, emotions experienced after a sharps injury, impact of sharps injuries on relationships, the support received by participants after a sharps injury and their coping mechanisms after a sharps injury. Several conclusions were drawn by the researcher from the data. Although all hospitals in this study had a reporting system in place, operating room personnel participating in this study did not report all their sharps injuries. They received no or insufficient support from hospital management after a sharps injury. No or insufficient communication existed between hospital management and participants in this study after these incidents. From these findings the researcher proposed guidelines for support to operating room personnel after sharps injuries and to increase the reporting of these incidents. The researcher also compiled recommendations for nursing practice, nursing education and nursing research in the operating room. / Thesis (M.Cur.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

Sharps injuries can transmit fatal blood-borne infections to injured health care workers. These blood-borne infections have serious consequences, including long-term illness, disability and death. The operating room is a fast-paced, hazardous working environment, where personnel are constantly exposed to sharps injuries. The psychological aspects of these injuries have received little attention. The emotional impact of a sharps injury can be severe and long lasting, even when a serious infection is not transmitted. Furthermore, according to literature, the mean rates of underreporting sharps injuries vary between twenty two and seventy five percent. The research objectives of this qualitative, explorative and descriptive study were to explore and describe the experiences of operating room personnel in the southern district of the North-West province in South Africa after sharps injuries, to explore and describe the reasons why they do not always report these incidents, to explore and describe what could be done to increase reporting of sharps incidents in operating rooms by personnel and to propose guidelines to support operating room personnel after a sharps injury. In order to achieve these objectives, the researcher gathered data by conducting semi-structured interviews with operating room personnel who had experienced sharps injuries in hospitals of the southern districts of the North-West in South Africa. Ethical considerations were adhered to by the researcher. Permission to conduct research was negotiated by the researcher with management of the hospitals in the target area. Voluntary, informed consent in writing was obtained from all participants before interviews were conducted. Data saturation was reached after 17 interviews were conducted with participants. Data were analysed with the help of an experienced co-coder. The researcher and co-coder reached consensus during a meeting organised for the purpose. Then the data were related to relevant literature. Seven categories emerged from the data analysis: Mechanisms of sharps injuries in the operating room, practical measures taken after a sharps injury, reasons for not reporting all sharps injuries, emotions experienced after a sharps injury, impact of sharps injuries on relationships, the support received by participants after a sharps injury and their coping mechanisms after a sharps injury. Several conclusions were drawn by the researcher from the data. Although all hospitals in this study had a reporting system in place, operating room personnel participating in this study did not report all their sharps injuries. They received no or insufficient support from hospital management after a sharps injury. No or insufficient communication existed between hospital management and participants in this study after these incidents. From these findings the researcher proposed guidelines for support to operating room personnel after sharps injuries and to increase the reporting of these incidents. The researcher also compiled recommendations for nursing practice, nursing education and nursing research in the operating room. / Thesis (M.Cur.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

Thesis (MEd (Human Resource Studies)) -- University of South Australia, 1990

Thesis (M.H.A.)--University of Michigan, 1974.