• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 17
  • 14
  • 10
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 2
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 52
  • 52
  • 17
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

CHARACTERIZATION AND INHERITANCE OF PHOTOPERIODISM IN GUAR, CYAMOPSIS TETRAGONOLOBA (L.) TAUB.

LUBBERS, EDWARD LAWRENCE. January 1987 (has links)
Three hundred and thirty lines of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) taub.) were planted in five locations throughout central and southwestern United States to find diverse photoperiod response types for closer physiological and genetic study. Dates of planting studies were done in 1982 and 1983 in hopes that the photoperiod responses would be obvious in field conditions but they were not. The 1982 dates of planting studies in Arizona, Kansas, and Texas indicated that the date of planting was more important than the selection of cultivar in expectations of high yield even though cultivar selection was very important. The 1983 dates of planting experiment in Tucson, Arizona showed suggestions that photoperiod existed in guar but it took controlled, greenhouse conditions to characterize photoperiodism in guar and to be able to conduct genetic analysis. In greenhouse studies, guar was found to be a quantitative short-day plant, the initiation of buds and floral development were accelerated under short-day conditions. Six guar lines were characterized for the critical photoperiod in days from first true leaf to the first floral bud and from first floral bud to the first flower. No effect of photoperiod on the growth and development from emergence to the first true leaf was observed. The critical photoperiod for days from first true leaf to first bud for the lines are as follows: PI217925-1-1, Mesa, and Mills are between 14 and 15 hours, Kinman and SEAH-90 are between 13 and 14 hours, and PI217925-2 is between 12 and 13 hours. The critical photoperiod for days from first floral bud to first flower for the lines are: PI217925-1-1, Mesa, Kinman, and PI217925-2 are between 12 and 13 hours, SEAH-90 is between 13 and 14 hours, and Mills is day-neutral. Different photoperiodic responses occur for days from first true leaf to first floral bud and days from first floral bud to first flower. This follows a proposed genetic system of photoperiodic actions that has genes for photoperiod sensitivity, short-day versus long-day reaction, critical photoperiod, and genes for the amount of time delay for each developmental stage. The segregations of the guar crosses were explained by the model.
2

Selection of planting date for maize in Parana State, Brazil

Gomes, Jose January 1988 (has links)
The effect of planting date on yield was studied in Parana State, Brazil where five tropical hybrids of maize were planted at 14 planting dates over three growing seasons at five locations. Soil water holding characteristics and meteorological variables were measured at each location. The water release curve for each soil was determined, using a power function. Corn heat units were calculated and used to measure the phenological development of each hybrid. This information, along with meteorological data, was used in a mathematical model to simulate plant growth over each growing period. Meteorological data from 1976 to 1986 were employed to simulate yield data for 14 planting dates during each growing season at four locations for each hybrid. The average production curve for the 10 growing seasons was compared to the curve observed for the 1986/87 growing season for three of the five hybrids. Thermal requirements appeared as an efficient tool to predict corn developmental stages, and the power function fit satisfactorily the observed soil data. The predicted curve, representing a 10-year average, showed that the designed model accounted for the major cultural and environmental factors that affect yield at each location, being sensitive enough to detect differences among genotypes. Comparisons between predicted and observed curves showed that they had the same shape.
3

Selection of planting date for maize in Parana State, Brazil

Gomes, Jose January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
4

Modeling rate of planting, date of planting and hybrid maturity effects on yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, (L.) Moench)

Baker, Daniel Myron January 2011 (has links)
Typescript (photocopy). / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
5

Effect of date of plantings on the yield and other agronomic characters of cotton

Choudhri, Mohammed Sharif, 1919- January 1947 (has links)
No description available.
6

Early spring broadcast seeding to improve established stands of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

Asbil, Wendy January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
7

Methods of selection for immersion tolerance during germination in experimental lines and commercial hybrids of maize (Zea Mays L.).

Levesque, Marcel G. January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
8

Early spring broadcast seeding to improve established stands of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

Asbil, Wendy January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
9

Methods of selection for immersion tolerance during germination in experimental lines and commercial hybrids of maize (Zea Mays L.).

Levesque, Marcel G. January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
10

PRODUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF HYBRID GRAIN SORGHUMS UNDER THREE PLANT POPULATIONS AND TWO PLANTING DATES.

Saeed, Mohammed Ahmed, 1940- January 1986 (has links)
No description available.

Page generated in 0.0883 seconds