Spelling suggestions: "subject:"lissamphibians"" "subject:"theamphibians""
1 |
Development and assessment of a wildlife habitat relationship model for terrestrial vertebrates in the state of MarylandNorthrop, Robert John. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Delaware, 2009. / Principal faculty advisor: Jacob L. Bowman, Dept. of Entomology & Wildlife Ecology. Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
Distribution patterns of reptiles and amphibians in Puerto Rico /Le, Minh Duc, January 1999 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Oregon State University, 2000. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 37-38). Also available via the World Wide Web.
|
3 |
State-wide assessment of status, predicted distribution, and landscape-level habitat suitability of amphibians and reptiles in MontanaMaxell, Bryce Alan. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (PHD)--University of Montana, 2009. / Contents viewed on December 22, 2009. Title from author supplied metadata. Includes bibliographical references.
|
4 |
The herpetofauna of southwestern New EnglandKlemens, Michael W. January 1990 (has links)
The distributions, variations, and abundances of the 45 species of amphibians and reptiles found in southwestern New England (USA) are described and analyzed using multivariate statistical techniques. These data are compared to historical information contained in museums and literature reports. Activity and reproductive parameters are described and compared to published data from other areas of North America. The conservation status of each species is discussed, and where appropriate, recovery strategies proposed.
|
5 |
Natural history and conservation biology of a southern West Virginia contour surface mine reptile and amphibian communityLoughman, Zachary James. January 2005 (has links)
Theses (M.S.)--Marshall University, 2005. / Title from document title page. Includes abstract. Document formatted into pages: contains viii, 94 p. Bibliography: p. 92-94.
|
6 |
The herpetofauna of Egypt : species, communities and assemblagesAhmed, Sherif M. Baha El Din January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Landscape structure and distribution patterns of wetland herpetofauna in Southern New EnglandBlack, David Hills January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Reproduction and herpetofauna depredation of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) at Fort Benning, GeorgiaJolley, David Buck. Ditchkoff, Stephen S. January 2007 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis(M.S.)--Auburn University, 2007. / Abstract. Vita. Includes bibliographic references.
|
9 |
Use of an artificial pond and marshes by amphibians and reptiles in West VirginiaDozeman, Vanessa A. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Marshall University, 2004. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 82 p. including illustrations. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 36-38).
|
10 |
Populační dynamika obojživelníků a plazů Vlkovské pískovny / Population dynamic of amphibians and reptiles of Vlkovská sandpitRŮŽIČKA, Jan January 2016 (has links)
The theoretical part contains summary of the literature on the topic of succession, mining, human impacts on biodiversity, land reclamation and ecological requirements of reptiles and amphibians. The practical part contains the observations of these two model groups of animals and subsequent evaluation of their abundance and diversity. During the three years I made total 37 herpetological observation, during which I observed the occurrence of eight species of reptiles and amphibians on five locations. When observing reptiles and amphibians I used non-invasive methods of observation. The found species were Zootoca vivipara (507 individuals), Lacerta agilis (583 individuals), Pelophylax esculentus (976 individuals), Pelophylax ridibundus (710 individuals), Pelophylax lessonae (1,401 individuals), Lissotriton vulgaris (203 individuals), Natrix natrix (32 individuals) and Anguis fragilis (7 individuals). The values in the brackets represent the total number of individuals found during 3 seasons. Generically the richest site was "Jezírka" (8 species), species habitat poorest contrary, "Přesyp" (2 species). In all the years the abundance of two model groups (frogs and lizards) were significantly different (abundance of Pelophylax: Chí Square = 2764; d. f. = 4, p <0.001, Zootoca + Lacerta: Chí Square = 119; d. f. = 4, p <0.001. Pelophylax: Chí Square = 1573; d. f. = 4, p <0.001, Zootoca + Lacerta: Chí Square = 43; d. f. = 4, p <0.001. Pelophylax: Chí Square = 37; d. f. = 4, p <0.001, Zootoca + Lacerta: Chí Square = 741; d. f. = 4; p <0.001). The researchl lasted three vegetation seasons. They had distinctly different climatic conditions. The abundance of reptiles and amphibians in season of 2013 was significantly impacted by the spring floods. Season 2014 any major climatic fluctuations and therefore I considered it as a standard. Season 2015 was greatly influenced by the high summer temperatures and the lack of greater precipitation during the summer months. This fact influenced mainly amphibian populations.
|
Page generated in 0.0457 seconds