1 |
Fragen aus dem gebiet des spezifikationserwerbes ...Pauer, Fritz. January 1915 (has links)
Inaugural dissertation--Rostock. / "Literaturverzeichnis": p. 28.
|
2 |
Fragen aus dem gebiet des spezifikationserwerbes ...Pauer, Fritz. January 1915 (has links)
Inaugural dissertation--Rostock. / "Literaturverzeichnis": p. 28.
|
3 |
Use of formal methods in the development of safety critical control softwareBlow, James Raymond January 2002 (has links)
Firstly, we extend the Generalised Substitution Language, and therefore the principles of weakest precondition calculus, to embrace differential constraints. Our approach is based on generalising the traditional view that a Generalised Substitution specifies a fragment of a sequential programme. We consider a Generalised Substitution to represent an autonomous transformation which is 'clocked' repeatedly to perform its computation at regular intervals. In the case of such components composed synchronously, we can generalise the notion of weakest precondition to traces (sequences of values) of inputs and outputs. In our approach we characterise traces with first order constraints as 'step' predicates over adjacent elements in the trace. We refer to these as 'acceptance criteria'. We also generalise our calculus to cover nth order differentials. Secondly, we adapt weakest precondition to traces characterised by state machines which represent sequencing constraints. We do this by introducing a form of state machines called 'acceptance machines' which constrain traces of variable values in an alternative way to differential properties. Using the Generalised Substitution Language once more we present a semantics for the propagation of acceptance machines in a manner analagous to predicate transformers. We also use acceptance machines to specify safety properties which have been derived from the safety process. The requirements can then be shown correct with respect to these properties. Finally, we consolidate and integrate our differential calculus and state machine theory with a domain specific formal framework, focusing on the practical application of the theory in a real engineering setting. The domain specific framework which we have selected is Practical Formal Specification. It is a framework which has been developed specifically for use in the engine (and aircraft) control software domain and is based on the decomposition of requirements into components whose usage can be scoped by the specification of environmental and contextual assumptions.
|
4 |
Implementing specifications using logic with inheritenceTomer, Amir January 1992 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
State transition specifications of abstract machinesMurrell, Stephen January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
A refinement calculus for expressionsFlynn, Sharon January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Sort inference in action semanticsBrown, Deryck Forsyth January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Characterisation of the role of ectopic root hair3 (ERH3) in Arabidopsis thaliana developmentWebb, Melanie Karen January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
Logic, programming and formal specificationGoldsmith, M. H. January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Understanding Z : A specification language and its formal semanticsSpivey, J. M. January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0155 seconds