Thesis (M.A. - Geography and Regional Development)--University of Arizona, 1988. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 116-119).

Thesis (Ph. D. - Geosciences) - University of Arizona. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 230-241).

Thesis (Ph. D.)-- (Anthropology), University of Arizona, 1997. / We acknowledge that there is a duplicate of page 134 in this thesis. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 280-310)..

The Santa Cruz River in southeastern Arizona is typical of large rivers of the semiarid southwestern United States. The 390-kilometer long river displays great variability in morphology, hydraulics, hydrologic, conditions, and bank stability, reflecting incomplete integration of the drainage system and the disequilibrium that is often characteristic of desert channels. Spatial variability is paralleled by temporal variability at all scales, from instantaneous conditions to millenia of geologic history. The alluvial history of the Santa Cruz River drainage basin suggests that transverse sediment transport toward the valley across alluvial fans has dominated fluvial processes for most of the history of the basin. No evidence is apparent for external drainage of the basin before the beginning of Fort Lowell Formation deposition, about 2.0 to 2.5 million years ago. The mid to late Pleistocene history of the system is poorly understood because of the paucity of the geologic record for this period. Several episodes of terrace formation apparently represent climatically induced sediment pulses and subsequent incision. The Holocene record of the Santa Cruz River suggests a major change in hydrologic regimen about 5,000 years ago when deposits indicate a substantial decrease in stream power. The last 2,500 years are marked by a sequence of channel cut and fill episodes similar to the historic episode of channel entrenchment that began in the 19th century. The hydrologic regimen of the Santa Cruz River is dominated by the occurrence of floods in direct response to precipitation. Three major storm types—monsoonal, frontal, and dissipating tropical—account for most streamflow. The storms cause floods with distinctly different characteristics. Monsoonal storm-caused floods may have quite high peak discharges, but are local and of short duration. Frontal and tropical storms cause floods of longer duration and flood volume and are more efficient agents of sediment transport and geomorphic change than are those caused by monsoonal storms. Geologic controls are the major factor governing the spatial variability of channel morphology and change. Hydrologic factors control the temporal variability of channel processes. Frontal and tropical storms are more likely to produce floods capable of causing and maintaining a continuously entrenched main channel. Floods caused by monsoonal storms do not appear capable of maintaining such a system.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

The overall objectives of a study initiated in 1972 by the Water Resources Research Center (Univ. of Arizona), in cooperation with the Pima County Dept. of Sanitation, are to examine the possibility of interactions between recharged river water and deposits in adjoining landfills, and if such interactions occur to evaluate the effect on native groundwater quality. Corresponding to these objectives, the principal function of a monitoring program initiated during the project was to characterize background water levels and native groundwater quality during normal low flows (i.e., sewage flows) in the river, and to monitor changes, if such occur, during flood flows. As it turns out, data from the project should also be applicable to the anticipated irrigation of farmland near Marana, using effluent from the Impending Ina Rd Treatment Facility. In particular, clues will be provided on transformations in sewage effluent quality during infiltration and deep percolation. The first phase of the project was conducted at the Ina Rd landfill and the second involved both the Ina Rd and Ruthrauff Rd fills. Results of the first phase were reported in a paper by Wilson and Small. This report will review the results of the second study phase. Specific objectives of the studies during the second phase included (1) obtaining river water and well water samples for chemical and microbiological analysis, (2) monitoring water level changes in available wells and (3) characterizing general features of the geohydrology in the vicinity of the landfills.

Thesis (M.A. - Geography and Regional Development)--University of Arizona. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 222-238).

No description available.