Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-02-20T21:07:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 SergioAugustoDeLimaESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 6688068 bytes, checksum: 50e8d678039249d547a08bb1108c4b42 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-02-22T23:52:40Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 SergioAugustoDeLimaESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 6688068 bytes, checksum: 50e8d678039249d547a08bb1108c4b42 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-22T23:52:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SergioAugustoDeLimaESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 6688068 bytes, checksum: 50e8d678039249d547a08bb1108c4b42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-27 / Este trabalho consiste na investiga??o sobre o discurso argumentativo em senten?as judicias condenat?rias. Para identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar os aspectos textuais e argumentativos, recorremos aos estudos sobre Lingu?stica textual (LT) e as categorias de an?lises da An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD) (cf. Adam, 2011; Soares, Silva Neto, Passeggi, 2010), e aos estudos do texto (Maingueneau, 2001, Marcuschi, 2008), e os estudos sobre argumenta??o (cf. Koch, 2009). Prop?e-se, pois, analisar como os aspectos argumentativos s?o constru?dos discursivamente, em senten?as judiciais, por meio de categorias de an?lise como os operadores argumentativos, as express?es modalizadoras e, por ?ltimo, a configura??o textual da sequ?ncia argumentativa. A an?lise, metodologicamente, seguiu o paradigma de abordagem qualitativa (Chizzotti, 1991; Nelson et al, 1992), de natureza documental (Severino, 2007), a fim de interpretar o conjunto dos dados emp?ricos presentes nos textos analisados. Nesta pesquisa, analisamos um corpus formado por um exemplar do g?nero senten?a judicial publicado no ano de 2012, proferido por juiz ou desembargador e coletado diretamente da p?gina inicial, no campo consulta de julgados de 1? grau, do s?tio do Tribunal de Justi?a do Estado de S?o Paulo (TJSP). Verifica-se, portanto, que s?o constru?das, no corpus analisado, diversas marcas lingu?sticas da argumenta??o, como recursos para textualiza??o e constru??o da configura??o argumentativa no g?nero senten?a judicial. Essas categorias permitem reconstruir textualmente a argumenta??o nesses textos. Dessa forma, a an?lise aponta para um discurso argumentativo constitu?do por diferentes e variadas marcas lingu?sticas e configura??es argumentativas, que fundamentam a decis?o final julgadora do m?rito. / This work is the investigation of the argumentative discourse in damning judicial sentences. To identify, describe, analyze and interpret the textual and argumentative aspects, recourse to textual studies on Linguistics (LT) and the categories of analysis of Textual Analysis of the Discourses (ATD) (see Adam, 2011; Soares, Silva Neto, Passeggi, 2010), and the text of the study (Maingueneau, 2001 Marcuschi, 2008), and studies on argumentation (cf. Koch, 2009). It is proposed, therefore, to analyze how the argumentative aspects are discursively constructed in judicial decisions through analysis of categories such as argumentative operators, modalizadoras expressions and, finally, the textual configuration of argumentative sequence. The analysis, methodologically, followed the qualitative approach paradigm (Chizzotti, 1991; Nelson et al, 1992), nature documentary (Severino, 2007) in order to interpret the set of empirical data present in the analyzed texts. In this research, we analyze a corpus formed by a copy of the court judgment genre published in 2012, given by the judge or judge and collected directly from the home page, the trial query field 1st degree, site of the State Court of S?o Paulo (Id). There is, therefore, which are built in the analyzed corpus, different language marks of argument as resources for textualization and construction of argumentative setting in gender court judgment. These categories allow to reconstruct verbatim the reasoning in these texts. Thus, the analysis points to an argumentative discourse made up of different and varied linguistic brands and argumentative configurations that support the final decision of judging merit.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2015-11-26T13:12:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Elisangela Moura (lilaalves@gmail.com) on 2015-11-26T14:23:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T14:23:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlexandroTeixeiraGomes_TESE.pdf: 22462974 bytes, checksum: 869b89b9949816c057b96f691600957d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / A An?lise Textual dos Discursos tem sua origem no ?mbito da Lingu?stica Textual e se prop?e a estudar a produ??o co(n)textual de sentido fundamentada na an?lise de textos concretos, oferecendo elementos para o entendimento do texto como uma pr?tica discursiva analisado ? luz de determinados planos ou n?veis de an?lise lingu?stica. Nesse sentido, ? nosso prop?sito, nesta investiga??o, estudar o fen?meno da responsabilidade enunciativa na senten?a judicial condenat?ria. Para tanto, seguimos os aportes te?ricos da An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ADAM, 2011) e da Lingu?stica Enunciativa, a partir de v?rios autores, entre eles, Rabatel (2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010), N?lke (2001, 2005, 2009, 2013), N?lke, Fl?ttum e Nor?n (2004), Guentch?va (1994, 1996, 2011) e Guentch?va et al. (1994). Nessa dire??o, investigamos a responsabilidade enunciativa, atrav?s de uma escala que compreende o fen?meno a partir de quatro grada??es, cada uma com um tipo de ponto de vista (PdV) e com elos que podem marcar a assun??o ou o distanciamento do ponto de vista. No que concerne ? abordagem jur?dica da tese, nossa ancoragem te?rica segue v?rios autores, entre eles, Petri (1994), Soto (2001), ?lvarez (2002), Alves (2003), Cornu (2005), Albi (2007), Bittar (2010), Asensio e Polanco (2011), L?pez Samaniego (2006), Montol?o e L?pez Samaniego (2008), Montol?o (2002, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Colares (2010), Prieto (2013), Louren?o e Rodrigues (2013) e Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2014). Nosso corpus se constitui de 13 senten?as condenat?rias provenientes de processos criminais oriundos da comarca de Currais Novos-RN, conclu?dos no ano de 2012. Os resultados revelam como o juiz, a partir de v?rias inst?ncias enunciativas, constr?i a senten?a judicial, o que nos permitiu compreender a configura??o da (n?o) assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa no g?nero discursivo / textual senten?a judicial condenat?ria. Como conclus?es, percebemos que as unidades discursivas s?o perspectivadas ora, a partir da assun??o, ora, a partir da n?o assun??o dos PdV pelas inst?ncias enunciativas, o que orienta a organiza??o argumentativa do produtor do texto e seus prop?sitos comunicativos. Com isso, o juiz cria e/ou modifica valores e cren?as, induz e/ou orienta seu interlocutor podendo demonstrar objetividade e/ou preservar sua face atrav?s de constru??es mediatizadas ou podendo engajar-se pelo dito atrav?s da assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa do conte?do proposicional do enunciado. Pelo exposto, reafirmamos nosso entendimento de que a (n?o) assun??o da responsabilidade enunciativa se configura como mecanismo argumentativo fortemente marcado pelo produtor do texto com vistas a seus prop?sitos comunicativos. A senten?a, portanto, constr?i-se nesse jogo de assun??o e/ou n?o assun??o dos enunciados de acordo com a orienta??o argumentativa e com os objetivos do produtor do texto. / The Textual Analysis of Discourse has its origin in Text Linguistics and it aims at studying the co(n)text meaning production based on the analysis of concrete texts by offering elements to the understanding of the text as a discourse practice throughout the plans or levels of linguistic analysis. In this perspective, we intend to investigate the enunciative responsibility phenomenon in the sentencing court judgment. To do so, we review the theoretical contributions of Textual Analysis of Discourse (ADAM, 2011) and the Enunciative Linguistics from various authors, among them, Rabatel (1998, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010), N?lke (2001, 2005, 2009, 2013), N?lke, Fl?ttum and Nor?n (2004), Guentch?va (1994, 1996) and Guentch?va et al. (1994). In this direction, we investigate the enunciative responsibility through a range that comprises the phenomenon from four gradations, each one with a kind of point of view (PoV) and with links that may mark the assumption or the distance from the point of view. Regarding the legal approach of the thesis, our theoretical anchoring follows several authors, among them, Petri (1994), Soto (2001), Alvarez (2002), Alves (2003), Cornu (2005), Albi (2007), Bittar (2010), Asensio and Polanco (2011), L?pez Samaniego (2006), L?pez Montol?o and Samaniego (2008), Montol?o (2002, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Sterling (2010), Prieto (2013), Lawrence and Rodrigues (2013) and Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2014). Our corpus is composed of 13 sentences from criminal cases arising from the district of Currais Novos-RN, completed in 2012. The results reveal how the judge, from various enunciative instances, builds the court decision, which allowed us to understand the configuration of (non) assumption of enunciative responsibility in the sentencing court judgment discourse genre. In conclusion, we perceive that the discourse units are envisaged or through the assumption, or the non assumption of PoV by the enunciative instances, what guides the producer organization argumentative text and his (her) communicative purposes. With that, the judge creates and/or modifies values and beliefs, induces and/or guides his (her) interlocutor by being able to demonstrate objectivity and/or preventing his (her) face through the mediated constructions or engage through the assumption of the enunciative responsibility of the propositional content of an utterance. In short, we reaffirm our belief that the (non) assumption of the enunciative responsibility configures as an argumentative mechanism strongly marked by the producer of the text with a view to their communicative purposes. The sentence, therefore, is constructed in this game of taking and/or not taking of statements according to argumentative orientation and the objectives of the text producer.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-01-14T18:43:07Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AlbaValeriaSaboiaTeixeiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1168957 bytes, checksum: fc49fda54f1359fb6787d97b3cbad786 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-01-15T17:12:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AlbaValeriaSaboiaTeixeiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1168957 bytes, checksum: fc49fda54f1359fb6787d97b3cbad786 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-15T17:12:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlbaValeriaSaboiaTeixeiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1168957 bytes, checksum: fc49fda54f1359fb6787d97b3cbad786 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-11-27 / Esta disserta??o tem como prop?sito identificar e descrever o fen?meno da representa??o discursiva da v?tima e do r?u no g?nero senten?a judicial. A pesquisa insere-se no ?mbito te?rico geral da lingu?stica textual e, mais especificamente, na an?lise textual dos discursos (ATD), teoria desenvolvida por Jean-Michel Adam ([2008] 2011). A no??o de representa??o discursiva proposta pela ATD constitui um dos aspectos mais importantes da dimens?o sem?ntica do texto e ? complementada nos trabalhos de Grize (1990, 1996) a partir da no??o de esquematiza??o. Nessa perspectiva, o trabalho ? orientado pelos estudos da lingu?stica do texto, com Koch (2012, 2005, 2004), Marcuschi (2012, 2008, 2005), Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014); do g?nero, com Bazerman (2005), Bakhtin (1992); e do discurso jur?dico, com Capez (2012), Pimenta (2007), Louren?o (2013) e Gomes (2014). Metodologicamente, ? uma pesquisa documental, apresentando um car?ter qualitativo, descritivo e orienta-se pelo m?todo do racioc?nio indutivo-dedutivo. O corpus ? constitu?do por uma senten?a judicial, de natureza penal, coletado eletronicamente do s?tio do Tribunal de Justi?a de S?o Paulo ? Poder Judici?rio, em Consulta de Julgados de 1? Grau, com a tem?tica da viol?ncia contra a mulher. Os procedimentos de an?lise utilizaram as categorias sem?nticas da representa??o discursiva, como a referencia??o, a predica??o, a modifica??o e a localiza??o espacial e temporal. Os resultados focalizaram a constru??o da representa??o discursiva dos sujeitos (v?tima e r?u) a partir de PdV de enunciadores distintos, que podem aproximar-se ou distanciar-se de acordo com a orienta??o argumentativa do texto. Assim, diante da import?ncia social do texto forense e, em especial, da senten?a judicial na vida dos cidad?os, foi poss?vel perceber a relev?ncia em desenvolver pesquisas que abordem o estudo da dimens?o sem?ntica do texto, principalmente na constru??o das representa??es dos objetos de discurso / This dissertation aims to identify and describe the phenomenon of discursive representation of victim and defendant in court judgment genre. Researchis part of general theoretical framework of text linguistics and more specifically in textual discourse analysis (ATD) theory developed by Jean-Michel Adam ([2008] 2011). Discursive representation notion proposed by ATD is one of the most important aspects of semantic dimension of the text, being complemented in the work of Grize (1990, 1996) from schematization notion. In this perspective, this work is guided by studies of text linguistics with Koch (2012, 2005, 2004), Marcuschi (2012, 2008, 2005), Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), with genre Bazerman (2005), Bakhtin (1992) and the juridical discourse with Capez (2012), Pimenta (2007), Louren?o (2013) and Gomes (2013) . Methodologically, is a documentary research, presenting qualitative and descriptive characters and is guided by the inductivedeductive method. Corpus consists of a judicial sentence, criminal, collected electronically from Court of Justice of S?o Paulo - Judiciary website in consultation Judged1st Degree, with the theme of violence against women. Analysis procedures use semantic categories of discursive representation, such as referencing, predication, modification and the spatial and temporal location. Results are focused on the construction of discursive representation of (victim and defendant) from PdV distinct enunciators, which may approach or distance themselves according to argumentative text orientation. Thus, considering social importance of forensic text and, in particular, court judgment in the lives of citizens, it was possible to realize the importance of developing research that addresses the study of text semantic dimension, especially in construction of representations of discourse objects

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-16T19:52:06Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-08-17T00:00:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-17T00:00:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscoGeonilsonCunhaFonseca_DISSERT.pdf: 1460278 bytes, checksum: bf800795ada9146e58669b60bce1f3ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-02 / Nesta pesquisa, estudamos a argumenta??o na senten?a judicial, cujo objetivo ? identificar, descrever e explicar o funcionamento dos operadores argumentativos na orienta??o argumentativa do texto e do discurso constru?do por interm?dio do texto da senten?a. Apoiamos nossa pesquisa nos construtos adotados pela An?lise Textual dos Discursos (Adam, 2011) e em Arist?teles (1959), Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996), Soto (2001), Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto e Passeggi (2010), Charaudeau (2012), Trubilhano e Henriques (2013), Keller e Bastos (2015) e outros. Na metodologia, adotamos o m?todo indutivo porque nossos resultados foram obtidos a partir de premissas (ou racioc?nios) particulares, baseadas na experi?ncia passada e presente e testadas na an?lise emp?rica da argumenta??o em um texto escrito, para, ent?o, dizer sobre uma lei geral que rege o fen?meno ou os efeitos dos operadores argumentativos para a orienta??o argumentativa do texto e do discurso. Quanto ? natureza e os objetivos, nossa pesquisa caracterizou-se como qualitativa e como uma investiga??o explicativa e descritiva, com procedimentos t?cnicos de coleta documental pesquisa bibliogr?fica. Como corpus, foi manuseada uma senten?a judicial extra?da do s?tio online da Justi?a Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN), que ? o resultado de uma a??o criminal movida pelo Minist?rio P?blico Federal contra um homem acusado de contrabando de cigarros importados. Trata-se de uma senten?a condenat?ria expedida em 10 de setembro de 2014, pelo juiz L.H.L.B, da 10? Vara Federal, em Mossor?/RN. De forma geral, os resultados revelaram que os operadores argumentativos exerceram papeis decisivos na organiza??o das estrat?gias argumentativas do texto e do discurso, orientando os coenunciadores para a conclus?o desejada pelo enunciador. Foi poss?vel, tamb?m, concluir que a argumenta??o foi constru?da a partir de marcas lingu?sticas e discursivas que mostraram o ponto de vista (PdV) do enunciador, os argumentos que sustentaram esse ponto de vista e as opera??es de racioc?nio l?gico que os operadores argumentativos possibilitaram construir para mostrar que as raz?es que sustentaram os argumentos foram verdadeiras e, portanto, a conclus?o, escolhida pelo enunciador, tamb?m foi a verdadeira. / We studied in this dissertation the argumentation in the court judgment, which goal was to identify, describe and explain the running of argumentative operators in the argumentative orientation of text and discourse built through the text of the judgment. We support our research in the constructs adopted for the ATD ? (Textual Analysis of the Discourses) - Adam (2011), in the studies about the Aristotle?s Rhetoric (1959) and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996) and other works such as of the Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Charaudeau (2012), Keller and Bastos (2015), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto and Passeggi (2010), Trubilhano and Henriques (2013). In a methodological way, we made use of deductive-inductive method, because we analyzed the argumentation in an "unknown" text - particular case - based on a theory already known (about language, text and argumentation). About the nature and objectives, our search was characterized as qualitatively and as an explanatory and descriptive investigation, with technical procedures of documental collection of Bibliographic Search. As corpus, we use a court judgment of character condemnatory, issued on September 10, 2014 and taken from the online site of the Federal Court of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). The results revealed that the argumentative operators exercised decisive roles in the organization of argumentative strategies of the text and the speech , guiding the announcer to the Desired conclusion by the enunciator. It was also possible to conclude that the use of argumentative operators allowed syllogistic constructions in the form of presentation of the arguments and in the construction of argumentation. In addition, operators like "but", "until", "already", "although" etc. helped to identify in the data's analysis the point of view (PoV) of the enunciator, the expectation break about the previous enunciate and / or the value scale given to the argument. Finally, with the use of argumentative operators the enunciator introduced arguments able to demonstrate/justify a thesis and refute an opposing thesis towards a conclusion sought by the own enunciator.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-03T18:12:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JoseIranilsonDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1803341 bytes, checksum: 7fb6a2b5fe9f5f8d8709bc502357e1ae (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-04T18:26:28Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JoseIranilsonDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1803341 bytes, checksum: 7fb6a2b5fe9f5f8d8709bc502357e1ae (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-04T18:26:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoseIranilsonDaSilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1803341 bytes, checksum: 7fb6a2b5fe9f5f8d8709bc502357e1ae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-02 / Esta disserta??o tem como prop?sito estudar o fen?meno da genericidade em senten?as judiciais, g?nero textual/discursivo circunscrito ao dom?nio jur?dico a partir da sua estrutura composicional e do seu plano de texto. A no??o de g?nero na abordagem da ATD est? situada na transi??o entre o discurso e o texto e a utilizamos como um dos n?veis/dimens?es de an?lise que perpassa pela no??o de plano de texto, tomando como base sua estrutura composicional. Nossa ancoragem te?rica situa-se no quadro geral da Lingu?stica Textual, e, mais especificamente, na abordagem da An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD), enfoque desenvolvido por Adam (2011a), nas no??es de g?nero textual/discursivo de Marcuschi (2002, 2008), Bazerman (2005) e nas proposi??es para estabelecer a genericidde de Adam e Heidmann (2011b), Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), dentre outros. A An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD) insere-se no ?mbito te?rico geral da lingu?stica textual e tem como objetivo estudar a produ??o co(n)textual de sentido, fundamentada na an?lise de textos concretos atrav?s da esquematiza??o de determinados planos ou n?veis de an?lise lingu?stica. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de natureza documental sob uma perspectiva indutivo-dedutiva, de car?ter qualitativo e descritivo. Investigamos um corpus de quatro senten?as judiciais de natureza criminal, coletadas do s?tio do Tribunal de Justi?a do Rio Grande do Norte - Poder Judici?rio, em consulta de Julgados de 1?. Grau. Em nossas an?lises evidenciamos que a senten?a judicial possui v?rias potencialidades gen?ricas que a atravessam em seus n?veis textuais e transtextuais, estabelecendo um di?logo intergen?rico (ADAM; HEIDMANN, 2011b), sendo uma pr?tica normatizada, cognitivamente e socialmente institu?da, podendo conter varia??es, mas tendo elementos cristalizados e com uma tradicionalidade funcional que n?o foi eliminada com o tempo. Diante da relev?ncia social do texto forense e, em especial, da senten?a judicial na vida dos cidad?os, esperamos contribuir para as pesquisas que abordem o estudo do texto jur?dico, principalmente, nos elementos de genericidade das senten?as judiciais. / This dissertation aims to study genericity in judicial decisions phenomenon, text/discourse genre confined to juridical field from its compositional structure and its text plan. The notion of gender in ATD addressing is located at transition between speech and text and we use as one of the levels/dimensions of analysis that permeates text plan notion, based on their compositional structure. Our theoretical anchorage is located in Linguistics Textual general framework, and, more specifically, in addressing Textual Analysis of Discourses (ATD) approach developed by Adam (2011a), the notions of genre/discourse of Marcuschi (2002, 2008), Bazerman (2005) and the proposals to establish genericidde of Adam and Heidmann (2006), Rodrigues, Passeggi e Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), among others. Textual Analysis of Discourses (ATD) is part of the general theoretical framework of text linguistics and aims to study sense co(n)text production, based on analysis of concrete texts through the drafting of certain plans or levels of linguistic analysis. It is a nature documentary research under an inductive-deductive perspective, qualitative and descriptive. We investigated a corpus of four court rulings criminal, collected from the site of Rio Grande do Norte Court of Justice - Judiciary, in First Degree Judged. We noted in our analysis that court ruling has several generic capabilities that cross in their textual and transtextual levels, establishing a dialogue intergeneric (ADAM; HEIDMANN, 2011b), being a standardized practice and cognitively socially instituted and may contain variations, but with crystallized elements and a functional traditionalism that has not been eliminated through time. Facing social relevance of forensic text and, especially, court judgment on people's life, we hope to contribute to research that addresses the study of legal text, especially in genericity elements of judicial sentence.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-28T18:59:11Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-28T20:50:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-28T20:50:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AndersonSouzaDaSilvaLanzillo_TESE.pdf: 3701428 bytes, checksum: 8f064a3f51acd1ba641b840c0df7a043 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-05 / O objetivo geral de nossa tese ? estudar o ponto de vista (PDV) e a responsabilidade enunciativa (RE) no g?nero discursivo senten?a judicial de pedido de fal?ncia. O estudo do PDV e da RE foram realizados numa perspectiva textual-enunciativa, pela qual toma a enuncia??o como fator de constru??o do sentido do texto (coes?o enunciativa). Estabelecemos como objetivos espec?ficos identificar, descrever, analisar e interpretar marcas lingu?sticas no texto a partir das categorias textuais e enunciativas selecionadas. Nossa investiga??o insere-se em um contexto de estudos do discurso jur?dico no ?mbito das ci?ncias da linguagem, um campo de estudos ainda pouco explorado, mas que a cada dia recebe mais aten??o dos investigadores. A pesquisa situa-se na linha de estudos lingu?sticos do texto, tomando como base te?rica a An?lise Textual dos Discursos (ATD), conforme a proposta de Adam (2011), decorrente da Lingu?stica do Texto e da Lingu?stica da Enuncia??o. Dessa forma, nosso quadro te?rico focaliza quatro eixos gerais (texto, g?nero, enuncia??o e discurso) e duas categorias de an?lises (PDV e RE). Adotamos a concep??o de g?nero do discurso de Bakhtin (1996), a qual ? seguida por Adam (2011), igualmente por outros te?ricos, como, por exemplo, Bazerman (2006) e Miller (2012). Os estudos do Ponto de Vista (PDV) e da Responsabilidade Enunciativa (RE), desenvolvidos por Rabatel (2008, 2009, 2013, 2015), s?o adotados como base te?rica geral da an?lise da enuncia??o e do que postulamos como ?opera??es textuais de constru??o do ponto de vista?. O corpus da pesquisa ? constitu?do por 13 senten?as judiciais decorrentes do pedido de fal?ncia de um credor contra um devedor. A realiza??o da investiga??o tomou como par?metro de an?lise a constru??o textual do PDV do juiz (L1/E1) acerca da decreta??o de fal?ncia do r?u (e3) pedida pelo autor (e2). A an?lise do corpus aponta como resultado que a constru??o do PDV pelo juiz ? realizada por diversos mecanismos lingu?sticos, textuais e discursivos, os quais mostram que a RE, ora ? assumida pelo L1/E1, ora imputando essa responsabilidade a outros enunciadores, especialmente os enunciadores: autor e r?u. Ainda se verificara a ocorr?ncia de uso de quadros mediativos (GUENTCH?VA, 1994, 1996, 2011, 2014), por meio dos quais o juiz n?o assume a RE pelo conte?do proposicional, imputando-a a outros enunciadores. Observamos, a partir da constru??o do PDV do juiz (L1/E1), a recorr?ncia da assun??o da RE pelo juiz (L1/E1), nas se??es de fundamenta??o e de dispositivo, enquanto no relat?rio predomina a imputa??o. Na perspectiva da coes?o enunciativa proposta pela nossa tese, foi verificado que o PDV do juiz ? constru?do, na dimens?o do acordo-desacordo, de maneira vari?vel conforme cada parte do plano de texto da senten?a judicial (neutralidade no relat?rio; realiza??o de acordo/desacordo na fundamenta??o; realiza??o ou de acordo ou de desacordo no dispositivo). Por fim, a realiza??o do acordo ? feita nessas senten?as, em muitos casos, por mecanismos de coconstru??o do PDV (coenuncia??o, sobrenuncia??o e subenuncia??o) entre o juiz e enunciadores segundos, mecanismos esses que se manifestam predominantemente na parte da fundamenta??o da senten?a judicial. / The main objective of our doctoral thesis is to study the point of view (PDV) and commitment in the discursive genre judicial sentence concerning bankruptcy of companies. The study of the PDV and commitment was carried out in a textual-enunciative perspective, by which it takes the enunciation as a factor of construction of the sense of the text (enunciative cohesion). We set as specific objectives of our research to identify, describe, analyze and interpret linguistic marks in the text from the selected textual and enunciative categories. Our research is part of a study of legal discourse in the field of language sciences, a field of studies that is still little explored, but which receives more and more attention from researchers every day. The research is based on the linguistic studies of the text, based on the Textual Analysis of Speeches (ATD), as proposed by Adam (2011), derived from Text Linguistics, and based on Linguistics of Enunciation. In this way, our theoretical framework focuses on four general axes (text, gender, enunciation and discourse) and two categories of analysis (PDV and Commitment). We adopt Bakhtin's (1996) conception of discourse genre, which is followed by Adam (2011), also by other theorists, such as Bazerman (2006) and Miller (2012). Rabatel's (2008, 2009, 2013, 2015) studies about Point of View (PDV) and Commitment studies are adopted as the general theoretical basis of the enunciation analysis and what we postulate as "textual construction of point of view". The corpus of the investigation is constituted by 13 judicial sentences resulting from the filing of bankruptcy by a creditor against a debtor. The investigation was based on the textual construction of the judge's decision (L1 / E1) on the defendant's decree of bankruptcy (e3) requested by the author (e2). The analysis of the corpus points out that the construction of the PDV by the judge is carried out by several linguistic, textual and discursive mechanisms, which show that the Commitment is sometimes assumed by L1 / E1, sometimes imputing this responsibility to other enunciators, especially the enunciators: author and defendant. The use of mediated frameworks (GUENTCH?VA, 1994, 1996, 2011, 2014) has been verified, whereby the judge does not assume the Commitment for propositional content and impute it to other enunciators. It was observed from the construction of the judge?s PDV (L1 / E1) that there was a recurrence of the assumption of Commitment by the judge (L1 / E1), in the legal substantiation and issue of orders section while in the facts section the imputation predominates. In the perspective of the enunciative cohesion proposed by our thesis, it was verified that the judge's PDV is constructed, in the dimension of the agreement-disagreement, in a variable way according to each part of the text plan of the judicial sentence (neutrality in the facts section; agreement or disagreement in the legal substantiation section; performance or agreement or disagreement in the issue of orders section). Finally, the agreement is made in these sentences in many cases by mechanisms of co-construction of the PDV (co-enunciation, super-enunciation and sub-enunciation) between the judge and second enunciators, mechanisms that are manifested predominantly in the part of legal substantiation section of the judicial sentence.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-02T21:56:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-06T00:04:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-06T00:04:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ValterRegisDeSouzaCardoso_DISSERT.pdf: 1059795 bytes, checksum: 938dfa43cb2d45fe9ca3186a59b51b25 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01-27 / Neste trabalho, ? luz da An?lise Textual dos Discursos ? abordagem desenvolvida por Adam (2011) ? propomos estudar a estrutura composicional do g?nero senten?a judicial com foco na no??o de plano de texto e de sequ?ncias textuais narrativas que se realizam em seu relat?rio ? parte que cont?m uma esp?cie de sinopse do processo. Com o objetivo principal de analisar como essas sequ?ncias ocorrem, procuramos identificar quais elementos textuais e discursivos s?o utilizados em sua tessitura, descrever esses elementos textuais e os seus encadeamentos na organiza??o das sequ?ncias narrativas, al?m de interpretar o papel dessas sequ?ncias textuais para a estrutura??o e a composi??o do g?nero. De forma mais ampla, nossa pesquisa est? fundamentada nos pressupostos gerais da Lingu?stica Textual em autores como Koch (1997; 1999; 2002; 2004), Koch e Elias (2012; 2013), Marcuschi (2002; 2008; 2012) entre outros. O corpus desta pesquisa ? composto por uma senten?a de natureza criminal, retirada do Banco de Senten?as do site da Justi?a Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). Metodologicamente, essa pesquisa apresenta aspecto documental e se orienta pelos m?todos do racioc?nio indutivo e dedutivo, apresentando um car?ter qualitativo e descritivo. Os resultados mostram que o relat?rio da senten?a n?o se limita apenas a listar ou enumerar as a??es praticadas pelas partes envolvidas no processo, mas possui um alto grau de narrativiza??o, apresentando todos os momentos de uma sequ?ncia narrativa e que, em fun??o das narrativas de n?vel global, existem as narrativas menores, as chamadas narrativas encaixadas, as quais desempenham um importante mecanismo de contextualiza??o e detalhamento de a??es relatadas. / In the present work, under the light of the Textual Discourse Analysis ? approach developed by Adam (2011) ? we propose to study the compositional structure of the genre judicial sentence, with a focus on the notion of text plan and on the narrative textual sequences that materialize in its report ? part that contains a kind of synopsis of the process. With the main objective of analyzing how these sequences occur, we try to identify which textual and discursive elements are used in their structure, to describe these textual elements and their threads in the organization of narrative sequences, besides to interpret the function of these textual sequences for structuring and composition. In a broader sense, this research is grounded on the general propositions of the Text Linguistics in authors like Koch (1997; 1999; 2002; 2004), Koch e Elias (2012; 2013), Marcuschi (2002; 2008; 2012) among others. The corpus of this research is composed of a single sentence of a criminal nature, extracted from the Sentence Database of the Federal Justice of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN) website. Regarding the applied methodology, the present research is of documental nature, whilst guided by an inductive-deductive reasoning and being of a qualitative and descriptive character. Methodologically, this research presents a documentary aspect and is guided by the methods of inductive and deductive reasoning, presenting a qualitative and descriptive character. Results indicate that the sentence report does not limit itself only to the listing and enumerating of the actions put into practice by the concerned parties throughout the legal process, but that it possess a high level of narrativization, displaying all components of a narrative sequence. And, because of the narratives at the global level, there are the smaller narratives, the so-called embedded narratives, which play an important contextualization and detailing mechanism of reported actions.