Spelling suggestions: "subject:"8tudent"" "subject:"astudent""
221 |
Students and users in the construction of the virtual universityBuchholz, Andrea January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
222 |
The psychological profile of biological and physical science oriented pupils at 16+ : With special reference to factors that influence attitudes towards science, subject preference, choice, teacher liking, social influence, career aspirations and personalAsiedu, K. January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
223 |
The transitions of traditional-entry students at universityPopham, Timothy Francis January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
224 |
Gender, power and resistance in post-sixteen science education : the production of student subjectivities within competing curriculum discourses and practicesHughes, Gwyneth January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
225 |
A method for representing and comparing content and cognitive structuresSchnetzler, R. P. January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
226 |
Self-evaluation and achievement in a vocationally orientated science practical courseDaines, John M. January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
227 |
A study of the relationship between Thai educators' emotional intelligence and the productiveness of the hidden curriculum in higher educationLazarte, Dely January 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
228 |
Teaching literature in a Turkish EFL context : empirical exploration of activity-based and process-oriented approachesTimucin, Metin January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
229 |
Follow-up study to determine lasting relationship between mobility and achievement, grade 11, Anderson City Schools, Anderson, Indiana, 1968-1969Sogbandi, Lahai Jojahba 03 June 2011 (has links)
There is no abstract available for this dissertation.
|
230 |
Klickers ur ett studentperspektiv : Studenters uppfattning av klickers vid Uppsala universitetSjölin, Jonatan, Ahlholm, Martin January 2014 (has links)
Audience responese technology (ART) often called clickers are becoming more common, not only internationally but also at Swedish universities. No direct Swedish research has been identified, this is however a major area of research internationally. There is both research on clickers positive effect on study results and how students feel about using clickers. This study has taken a Swedish translated version of Cheesman, Winograd, and Wehrman’s (2010) survey to investigate how perception of clickers differ between students in Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy and Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology. 166 unique students, 48 students at the disciplinary domain of medicine and pharmacy, and 118 students in the disciplinary domain of science and technology has responded. It is possible to find significant differences in students perception in all four factors examined between students at the various disciplinary domains. Students at the disciplinary domain of medicine and pharmacy were more positive to both the factor ‘feedback and understanding’ and the factor ‘anonymity’, and they were less negative to the factor ‘points’. The students at the disciplinary domain of science and technology were more positive to the factor ‘peer discussions’. When it comes to sex, you can not ensure any significant differences between males and females. There were also large differences between the results of this study and Cheesman, Winograd, and Wehrman’s (2010) study. This suggests that a student's disciplinary domain or culture is vital to the student's attitude toward clickers.
|
Page generated in 0.0399 seconds