Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T17:40:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 7 / Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos / A pesquisa obedece ao movimento do método fenomenológico-hermenêutico de Martin Heidegger e busca a edificação de uma teoria hermenêutica voltada para a compreensão do direito. Analisa o modo como o conhecimento era concebido na antiguidade clássica e a relação da filosofia com outras formas de saber. Mostra como a ciência e a filosofia modernas foram sustentadas pela armação da técnica e como a racionalidade abstrata dominou as concepções jusnaturalistas da época. Analisa, por outro lado, a tradição antropológica do direito moderno e as limitações ao direito positivo impostas pelo direito natural. Levando em consideração o projeto de modernidade e o seu desvirtuamento, identifica as causas de consolidação do positivismo primitivo burguês e a redução do direito ao texto. O método silogístico e a redução do direito ao texto são as marcas do esquecimento do sentido do direito na modernidade. Visando a retomada do ser no direito, após concluir pela insipiência da crítica ao positivismo que se desenvolve no séc.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T17:53:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 29 / Nenhuma / O objeto de análise desta tese é o sitcom A grande família, da Rede Globo de Televisão (RGT), procurando descrever as estruturas que moldam o programa, identificar os temas tratados e os modelos de comportamento construídos, observando a construção do perfil dos personagens e as propostas de atitudes que são oferecidas aos telespectadores. O estudo de caso, para identificar as propostas de interação do programa e suas lógicas de funcionamento, foi organizado em duas etapas. Na primeira, realizou-se uma observação descritiva das regularidades do programa para captar sua estrutura geral, nos aspectos formais: vinhetas, títulos dos episódios, cenários, figurinos e as temáticas abordadas. Foram observados para isso um total de 106 episódios. Para a segunda fase foram selecionados dez episódios, a partir dos perfis dos personagens e das seqüências e temáticas abordadas. Essa segunda etapa possibilitou identificar um conjunto de estereótipos relacionados às diferentes interações sociais no âmbito familiar/privado / The object of the analysis of this paper is the sitcom A grande família, from Globo Network Television, RGT, seeking to describe the structures that cast the program, identifying the themes presented and the behaviour models built, observing the contruction of the character’s profile and the attitude proposals that are offered to the televiewers. The case study, to identify the proposal of the program interaction and it’s logics of working was organized in two parts. In the first, we made a descriptive observation of the regularity of the program to capture its general structure, in the formal aspects: vignettes, episodes’ tittles, sceneries, patterns and the thematics approached; to do so, it was observed 106 episodes. For the second part ten episodes were selected analyzing the profiles of the characters and the sequences and the thematic approached. This second part made it possible to identify a group of stereotypes related to the different social interactions from the family/private scope that, treated i

The complexity of biological systems constitute a significant problem for the development of biological models. This inspired the creation of a few Computational Scientific Discovery systems that attempt to address this problem in the context of metabolomics through the use of computers and automation. These systems have important limitations, however, like limited revision and experiment design abilities and the inability to revise refuted models. The goal of this project was to address some of these limitations. The system developed for this project, "Huginn", was based on the use of Abductive Logic Programming to automate crucial development tasks, like experiment design, testing consistency of models with experimental results and revision of refuted models. The main questions of this project were (1) whether the proposed system can successfully develop Metabolic Network Models and (2) whether it can do it better than its predecessors. To answer these questions we tested Huginn in a simulated environment. Its task was to relearn the structures of disrupted fragments of a state-of-the-art model of yeast metabolism. The results of the simulations show that Huginn can relearn the structure of metabolic models, and that it can do it better than previous systems thanks to the specific features introduced in it. Furthermore, we show how the design of extended crucial experiments can be automated using Answer Set Programming for the first time.

Answer Set Programming (ASP) emerged in the late 1990s as a new logic programming paradigm, having its roots in nonmonotonic reasoning, deductive databases, and logic programming with negation as failure. The basic idea of ASP is to represent a computational problem as a logic program whose answer sets correspond to solutions, and then to use an answer set solver for finding answer sets of the program. ASP is particularly suited for solving NP-complete search problems. Among these, we find applications to product configuration, diagnosis, and graph-theoretical problems, e.g. finding Hamiltonian cycles. On different lines of ASP research, many extensions of the basic formalism have been proposed. The most intensively studied one is the modelling of preferences in ASP. They constitute a natural and effective way of selecting preferred solutions among a plethora of solutions for a problem. For example, preferences have been successfully used for timetabling, auctioning, and product configuration. In this thesis, we concentrate on preferences within answer set programming. Among several formalisms and semantics for preference handling in ASP, we concentrate on ordered logic programs with the underlying D-, W-, and B-semantics. In this setting, preferences are defined among rules of a logic program. They select preferred answer sets among (standard) answer sets of the underlying logic program. Up to now, those preferred answer sets have been computed either via a compilation method or by meta-interpretation. Hence, the question comes up, whether and how preferences can be integrated into an existing ASP solver. To solve this question, we develop an operational graph-based framework for the computation of answer sets of logic programs. Then, we integrate preferences into this operational approach. We empirically observe that our integrative approach performs in most cases better than the compilation method or meta-interpretation. Another research issue in ASP are optimization methods that remove redundancies, as also found in database query optimizers. For these purposes, the rather recently suggested notion of strong equivalence for ASP can be used. If a program is strongly equivalent to a subprogram of itself, then one can always use the subprogram instead of the original program, a technique which serves as an effective optimization method. Up to now, strong equivalence has not been considered for logic programs with preferences. In this thesis, we tackle this issue and generalize the notion of strong equivalence to ordered logic programs. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the strong equivalence of two ordered logic programs. Furthermore, we provide program transformations for ordered logic programs and show in how far preferences can be simplified. Finally, we present two new applications for preferences within answer set programming. First, we define new procedures for group decision making, which we apply to the problem of scheduling a group meeting. As a second new application, we reconstruct a linguistic problem appearing in German dialects within ASP. Regarding linguistic studies, there is an ongoing debate about how unique the rule systems of language are in human cognition. The reconstruction of grammatical regularities with tools from computer science has consequences for this debate: if grammars can be modelled this way, then they share core properties with other non-linguistic rule systems. / Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung entwickelte sich in den späten 90er Jahren als neues Paradigma der logischen Programmierung und ist in den Gebieten des nicht-monotonen Schließens und der deduktiven Datenbanken verwurzelt. Dabei wird eine Problemstellung als logisches Programm repräsentiert, dessen Lösungen, die so genannten Antwortmengen, genau den Lösungen des ursprünglichen Problems entsprechen. Die Antwortmengenprogrammierung bildet ein geeignetes Fundament zur Repräsentation und zum Lösen von Entscheidungs- und Suchproblemen in der Komplexitätsklasse NP. Anwendungen finden wir unter anderem in der Produktkonfiguration, Diagnose und bei graphen-theoretischen Problemen, z.B. der Suche nach Hamiltonschen Kreisen. In den letzten Jahren wurden viele Erweiterungen der Antwortmengenprogrammierung betrachtet. Die am meisten untersuchte Erweiterung ist die Modellierung von Präferenzen. Diese bilden eine natürliche und effektive Möglichkeit, unter einer Vielzahl von Lösungen eines Problems bevorzugte Lösungen zu selektieren. Präferenzen finden beispielsweise in der Stundenplanung, bei Auktionen und bei Produktkonfigurationen ihre Anwendung. Der Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Modellierung, Implementierung und Anwendung von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Da es verschiedene Ansätze gibt, um Präferenzen darzustellen, konzentrieren wir uns auf geordnete logische Programme, wobei Präferenzen als partielle Ordnung der Regeln eines logischen Programms ausgedrückt werden. Dabei betrachten wir drei verschiedene Semantiken zur Interpretation dieser Präferenzen. Im Vorfeld wurden für diese Semantiken die bevorzugten Antwortmengen durch einen Compiler oder durch Meta-Interpretation berechnet. Da Präferenzen Lösungen selektieren, stellt sich die Frage, ob es möglich ist, diese direkt in den Berechnungsprozeß von präferenzierten Antwortmengen zu integrieren, so dass die bevorzugten Antwortmengen ohne Zwischenschritte berechnet werden können. Dazu entwickeln wir zuerst ein auf Graphen basierendes Gerüst zur Berechnung von Antwortmengen. Anschließend werden wir darin Präferenzen integrieren, so dass bevorzugte Antwortmengen ohne Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation berechnet werden. Es stellt sich heraus, dass die integrative Methode auf den meisten betrachteten Problemklassen wesentlich leistungsfähiger ist als der Compiler oder Meta-Interpretation. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit liegt in der Frage, inwieweit sich geordnete logische Programme vereinfachen lassen. Dazu steht die Methodik der strengen Äquivalenz von logischen Programmen zur Verfügung. Wenn ein logisches Programm streng äquivalent zu einem seiner Teilprogramme ist, so kann man dieses durch das entsprechende Teilprogramm ersetzen, ohne dass sich die zugrunde liegende Semantik ändert. Bisher wurden strenge Äquivalenzen nicht für logische Programme mit Präferenzen untersucht. In dieser Arbeit definieren wir erstmalig strenge Äquivalenzen für geordnete logische Programme. Wir geben notwendige und hinreichende Bedingungen für die strenge Äquivalenz zweier geordneter logischer Programme an. Des Weiteren werden wir auch die Frage beantworten, inwieweit geordnete logische Programme und deren Präferenzstrukturen vereinfacht werden können. Abschließend präsentieren wir zwei neue Anwendungsbereiche von Präferenzen in der Antwortmengenprogrammierung. Zuerst definieren wir neue Prozeduren zur Entscheidungsfindung innerhalb von Gruppenprozessen. Diese integrieren wir anschließend in das Problem der Planung eines Treffens für eine Gruppe. Als zweite neue Anwendung rekonstruieren wir mit Hilfe der Antwortmengenprogrammierung eine linguistische Problemstellung, die in deutschen Dialekten auftritt. Momentan wird im Bereich der Linguistik darüber diskutiert, ob Regelsysteme von (menschlichen) Sprachen einzigartig sind oder nicht. Die Rekonstruktion von grammatikalischen Regularitäten mit Werkzeugen aus der Informatik erlaubt die Unterstützung der These, dass linguistische Regelsysteme Gemeinsamkeiten zu anderen nicht-linguistischen Regelsystemen besitzen.

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is an emerging paradigm for declarative programming, in which a computational problem is specified by a logic program such that particular models, called answer sets, match solutions. ASP faces a growing range of applications, demanding for high-performance tools able to solve complex problems. ASP integrates ideas from a variety of neighboring fields. In particular, automated techniques to search for answer sets are inspired by Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solving approaches. While the latter have firm proof-theoretic foundations, ASP lacks formal frameworks for characterizing and comparing solving methods. Furthermore, sophisticated search patterns of modern SAT solvers, successfully applied in areas like, e.g., model checking and verification, are not yet established in ASP solving. We address these deficiencies by, for one, providing proof-theoretic frameworks that allow for characterizing, comparing, and analyzing approaches to answer set computation. For another, we devise modern ASP solving algorithms that integrate and extend state-of-the-art techniques for Boolean constraint solving. We thus contribute to the understanding of existing ASP solving approaches and their interconnections as well as to their enhancement by incorporating sophisticated search patterns. The central idea of our approach is to identify atomic as well as composite constituents of a propositional logic program with Boolean variables. This enables us to describe fundamental inference steps, and to selectively combine them in proof-theoretic characterizations of various ASP solving methods. In particular, we show that different concepts of case analyses applied by existing ASP solvers implicate mutual exponential separations regarding their best-case complexities. We also develop a generic proof-theoretic framework amenable to language extensions, and we point out that exponential separations can likewise be obtained due to case analyses on them. We further exploit fundamental inference steps to derive Boolean constraints characterizing answer sets. They enable the conception of ASP solving algorithms including search patterns of modern SAT solvers, while also allowing for direct technology transfers between the areas of ASP and SAT solving. Beyond the search for one answer set of a logic program, we address the enumeration of answer sets and their projections to a subvocabulary, respectively. The algorithms we develop enable repetition-free enumeration in polynomial space without being intrusive, i.e., they do not necessitate any modifications of computations before an answer set is found. Our approach to ASP solving is implemented in clasp, a state-of-the-art Boolean constraint solver that has successfully participated in recent solver competitions. Although we do here not address the implementation techniques of clasp or all of its features, we present the principles of its success in the context of ASP solving. / Antwortmengenprogrammierung (engl. Answer Set Programming; ASP) ist ein Paradigma zum deklarativen Problemlösen, wobei Problemstellungen durch logische Programme beschrieben werden, sodass bestimmte Modelle, Antwortmengen genannt, zu Lösungen korrespondieren. Die zunehmenden praktischen Anwendungen von ASP verlangen nach performanten Werkzeugen zum Lösen komplexer Problemstellungen. ASP integriert diverse Konzepte aus verwandten Bereichen. Insbesondere sind automatisierte Techniken für die Suche nach Antwortmengen durch Verfahren zum Lösen des aussagenlogischen Erfüllbarkeitsproblems (engl. Boolean Satisfiability; SAT) inspiriert. Letztere beruhen auf soliden beweistheoretischen Grundlagen, wohingegen es für ASP kaum formale Systeme gibt, um Lösungsmethoden einheitlich zu beschreiben und miteinander zu vergleichen. Weiterhin basiert der Erfolg moderner Verfahren zum Lösen von SAT entscheidend auf fortgeschrittenen Suchtechniken, die in gängigen Methoden zur Antwortmengenberechnung nicht etabliert sind. Diese Arbeit entwickelt beweistheoretische Grundlagen und fortgeschrittene Suchtechniken im Kontext der Antwortmengenberechnung. Unsere formalen Beweissysteme ermöglichen die Charakterisierung, den Vergleich und die Analyse vorhandener Lösungsmethoden für ASP. Außerdem entwerfen wir moderne Verfahren zum Lösen von ASP, die fortgeschrittene Suchtechniken aus dem SAT-Bereich integrieren und erweitern. Damit trägt diese Arbeit sowohl zum tieferen Verständnis von Lösungsmethoden für ASP und ihrer Beziehungen untereinander als auch zu ihrer Verbesserung durch die Erschließung fortgeschrittener Suchtechniken bei. Die zentrale Idee unseres Ansatzes besteht darin, Atome und komposite Konstrukte innerhalb von logischen Programmen gleichermaßen mit aussagenlogischen Variablen zu assoziieren. Dies ermöglicht die Isolierung fundamentaler Inferenzschritte, die wir in formalen Charakterisierungen von Lösungsmethoden für ASP selektiv miteinander kombinieren können. Darauf aufbauend zeigen wir, dass unterschiedliche Einschränkungen von Fallunterscheidungen zwangsläufig zu exponentiellen Effizienzunterschieden zwischen den charakterisierten Methoden führen. Wir generalisieren unseren beweistheoretischen Ansatz auf logische Programme mit erweiterten Sprachkonstrukten und weisen analytisch nach, dass das Treffen bzw. Unterlassen von Fallunterscheidungen auf solchen Konstrukten ebenfalls exponentielle Effizienzunterschiede bedingen kann. Die zuvor beschriebenen fundamentalen Inferenzschritte nutzen wir zur Extraktion inhärenter Bedingungen, denen Antwortmengen genügen müssen. Damit schaffen wir eine Grundlage für den Entwurf moderner Lösungsmethoden für ASP, die fortgeschrittene, ursprünglich für SAT konzipierte, Suchtechniken mit einschließen und darüber hinaus einen transparenten Technologietransfer zwischen Verfahren zum Lösen von ASP und SAT erlauben. Neben der Suche nach einer Antwortmenge behandeln wir ihre Aufzählung, sowohl für gesamte Antwortmengen als auch für Projektionen auf ein Subvokabular. Hierfür entwickeln wir neuartige Methoden, die wiederholungsfreies Aufzählen in polynomiellem Platz ermöglichen, ohne die Suche zu beeinflussen und ggf. zu behindern, bevor Antwortmengen berechnet wurden.

Biology has made great progress in identifying and measuring the building blocks of life. The availability of high-throughput methods in molecular biology has dramatically accelerated the growth of biological knowledge for various organisms. The advancements in genomic, proteomic and metabolomic technologies allow for constructing complex models of biological systems. An increasing number of biological repositories is available on the web, incorporating thousands of biochemical reactions and genetic regulations. Systems Biology is a recent research trend in life science, which fosters a systemic view on biology. In Systems Biology one is interested in integrating the knowledge from all these different sources into models that capture the interaction of these entities. By studying these models one wants to understand the emerging properties of the whole system, such as robustness. However, both measurements as well as biological networks are prone to considerable incompleteness, heterogeneity and mutual inconsistency, which makes it highly non-trivial to draw biologically meaningful conclusions in an automated way. Therefore, we want to promote Answer Set Programming (ASP) as a tool for discrete modeling in Systems Biology. ASP is a declarative problem solving paradigm, in which a problem is encoded as a logic program such that its answer sets represent solutions to the problem. ASP has intrinsic features to cope with incompleteness, offers a rich modeling language and highly efficient solving technology. We present ASP solutions, for the analysis of genetic regulatory networks, determining consistency with observed measurements and identifying minimal causes for inconsistency. We extend this approach for computing minimal repairs on model and data that restore consistency. This method allows for predicting unobserved data even in case of inconsistency. Further, we present an ASP approach to metabolic network expansion. This approach exploits the easy characterization of reachability in ASP and its various reasoning methods, to explore the biosynthetic capabilities of metabolic reaction networks and generate hypotheses for extending the network. Finally, we present the BioASP library, a Python library which encapsulates our ASP solutions into the imperative programming paradigm. The library allows for an easy integration of ASP solution into system rich environments, as they exist in Systems Biology. / In den letzten Jahren wurden große Fortschritte bei der Identifikation und Messung der Bausteine des Lebens gemacht. Die Verfügbarkeit von Hochdurchsatzverfahren in der Molekularbiology hat das Anwachsen unseres biologischen Wissens dramatisch beschleunigt. Durch die technische Fortschritte in Genomic, Proteomic und Metabolomic wurde die Konstruktion komplexer Modelle biologischer Systeme ermöglicht. Immer mehr biologische Datenbanken sind über das Internet verfügbar, sie enthalten tausende Daten biochemischer Reaktionen und genetischer Regulation. System Biologie ist ein junger Forschungszweig der Biologie, der versucht Biologische Systeme in ihrer Ganzheit zu erforschen. Dabei ist man daran interessiert möglichst viel Wissen aus den unterschiedlichsten Bereichen in ein Modell zu aggregieren, welches das Zusammenwirken der verschiedensten Komponenten nachbildet. Durch das Studium derartiger Modelle erhofft man sich ein Verständnis der aufbauenden Eigenschaften, wie zum Beispiel Robustheit, des Systems zu erlangen. Es stellt sich jedoch die Problematik, das sowohl die biologischen Modelle als auch die verfügbaren Messwerte, oft unvollständig, miteinander unvereinbar oder fehlerhaft sind. All dies macht es schwierig biologisch sinnvolle Schlussfolgerungen zu ziehen. Daher, möchten wir in dieser Arbeit Antwortmengen Programmierung (engl. Answer Set Programming; ASP) als Werkzeug zur diskreten Modellierung system biologischer Probleme vorschlagen. ASP verfügt über eingebaute Eigenschaften zum Umgang mit unvollständiger Information, eine reichhaltige Modellierungssprache und hocheffiziente Berechnungstechniken. Wir präsentieren ASP Lösungen zur Analyse von Netzwerken genetischer Regulierungen, zur Prüfung der Konsistenz mit gemessene Daten, und zur Identifikation von Gründen für Inkonsistenz. Diesen Ansatz erweitern wir um die Möglichkeit zur Berechnung minimaler Reparaturen an Modell und Daten, welche Konsistenz erzeugen. Mithilfe dieser Methode werden wir in die Lage versetzt, auch im Fall von Inkonsistenz, noch ungemessene Daten vorherzusagen. Weiterhin, präsentieren wir einen ASP Ansatz zur Analyse metabolischer Netzwerke. Bei diesem Ansatz, nutzen wir zum einen aus das sich Erreichbarkeit mit ASP leicht spezifizieren lässt und das ASP mehrere mächtige Methoden zur Schlussfolgerung bereitstellt, welche sich auch kombiniert lassen. Dadurch wird es möglich die Synthese Möglichkeiten eines Metabolischen Netzwerks zu erforschen und Hypothesen für Erweiterungen des metabolischen Netzwerks zu berechnen. Zu guter Letzt, präsentieren wir die BioASP Softwarebibliothek. Die BioASP-Bibliothek kapselt unsere ASP Lösungen in das imperative Programmierparadigma und vereinfacht eine Integration von ASP Lösungen in heterogene Betriebsumgebungen, wie sie in der System Biologie vorherrschen.

No description available.

The words in a language not only help us to construct the sentences but also contain some other features, which we usually underestimate. Each word relates itself to the remaining ones in some way. In our daily lives, we extensively use these relations in many areas, where question direction is also one of them. In this work, it is investigated whether the relations between the words can be useful for question direction and an approach for question direction is presented. Besides, a tool is devised in the way of this approach for a course given in Turkish. The relations between the words are represented by a semantic network for nouns and verbs. By passing through the whole course material and using the relations meronymy for only nouns / synonymy, antonymy, hypernymy, coordinated words for both nouns and verbs / entailment and causality for only verbs, the semantic network, which is the backbone of the application, is constructed. The end product of our research consists of three modules: &middot / getting the question from the user and constructing the set of words that are related to the words that make up the question &middot / scoring each course section by comparing the words of the question set and the words in the section &middot / presenting the sections that may contain the answer The sections that are evaluated are taken as the sections of the course for granted. The chat logs that expand three years of the course were taken by permission and questions were extracted from them. They were used for testing purposes of the constructed application.

The main aim of diploma thesis is to create a collection of tests which helps the students to prepare for the admission exam to eight - year grammar school. The theoretical part of diploma thesis focuses on the admission exam in school year 2016/2017 and the analysis of mathematical didactic test. The practical part contains a processing of seven tests. Each test includes a task, a solution and an answer key. Furthermore, the research is processed here for which the second test from diploma thesis has been used. Even children participating in mathematical Olympiad can use the tests from diploma thesis for practising. The teachers can also make mathematics lesson more varied by the right choice of exercises.

abstract: Reasoning about actions forms the basis of many tasks such as prediction, planning, and diagnosis in a dynamic domain. Within the reasoning about actions community, a broad class of languages, called action languages, has been developed together with a methodology for their use in representing and reasoning about dynamic domains. With a few notable exceptions, the focus of these efforts has largely centered around single-agent systems. Agents rarely operate in a vacuum however, and almost in parallel, substantial work has been done within the dynamic epistemic logic community towards understanding how the actions of an agent may effect not just his own knowledge and/or beliefs, but those of his fellow agents as well. What is less understood by both communities is how to represent and reason about both the direct and indirect effects of both ontic and epistemic actions within a multi-agent setting. This dissertation presents ongoing research towards a framework for representing and reasoning about dynamic multi-agent domains involving both classes of actions. The contributions of this work are as follows: the formulation of a precise mathematical model of a dynamic multi-agent domain based on the notion of a transition diagram; the development of the multi-agent action languages mA+ and mAL based upon this model, as well as preliminary investigations of their properties and implementations via logic programming under the answer set semantics; precise formulations of the temporal projection, and planning problems within a multi-agent context; and an investigation of the application of the proposed approach to the representation of, and reasoning about, scenarios involving the modalities of knowledge and belief. / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Computer Science 2018