1 |
Die Beschwer bei den Rechtsmitteln der Berufung und der Revision in bürgerlichen Rechtsstreitigkeiten /Kanka, Karl. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Giessen.
|
2 |
Die Zurücknahme der Revision /Molzow, Carl Heinz, January 1932 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Rostock, 1932. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 5-6).
|
3 |
Die Beschränkung von Rechtsmitteln auf einzelne Beschwerdepunkte /Bastelberger, Carl. January 1919 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen.
|
4 |
Criminal procedure in North Carolina as shown by criminal appeals since 1890 ...Sherrill, George R. January 1930 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1930. / Vita. Published also without thesis note. "Table of cases": p. 170-173.
|
5 |
Ephesis in Athenian litigation ...Ralph, John Danby, January 1941 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, 1936. / Reproduced from type-written copy. "Private edition, distributed by the University of Chicago libraries, Chicago Illinois." Includes bibliographical references.
|
6 |
Die Beruhensfrage im strafprozessualen Revisionsrecht /Kraus, Steffen, January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Kiel, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. xi-xl).
|
7 |
Das beschwerdeverfahren der strafprozessordnung. ...Bauer, Hugo, January 1932 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Erlangen University, 1930.
|
8 |
An analytic model of the normative field of appellate judgesDenman, Alvin L January 1967 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. / This dissertation constructs and illustrates a model of the field of norms which lies before an appellate judge.
The style of the model is both academic and graphic. The function is analytic. The method is phenomenological, analytic and synthetic. Three major illustrations--landmark cases--provide a synthesis and explanation at the boundary lines of the field sectors.
In Chapter II, the structural elements of the field are analyzed.
First, the field is encircled and divided into thirds along a scale of normative agreement-disagreement, noting, concurrently, correlative social processes which provide social order. Where there is normative unity, processes of prescription provide order; where plurality, collaboration; where diversity, reciprocity.
Second, the field is divided into three levels. Within the ultimate-mediate-proximate hierarchy, there is an inverse relationship between formal and situational authority. When norm components (subject, normed-act, and conditions of application) fit the case, lower norms exert more influence than do hi gher norms. When fit is at issue, higher norms control.
Third, the sectors which lie between the three processes of social order are identified and examined as basic social units whose functional specializations are guided by particular norm types. The cultural (religious, familial, educational, and artistic) sector is bounded by processes of prescription and reciprocity; persons feel themselves to be duty-bound and conscience-directed by patterns of being and belonging. The economic-political sector is bounded by processes of reciprocity and collaboration; persons feel the necessity of choice and calculation of means and ends in order to achieve their interests. The legal (primarily judicial) sector is bounded by processes of collaboration and prescription; litigants feel the process by which they will be judged should be fair, and the content should be more than legal; judges feel they should account to litigants and various publics for their actions by reasoned reference to legal standards which respond to the whole life-range of norms.
Finally,the hierarchical levels of the three sectors are examined and described separately. The cultural sector is differentiated into ethos, moral code, and mores; the economic-political sector into goals, policies, and needs; the legal sector into concepts, rules-in-books, and rules-in-action.
In Chapter III, the focus is upon functional elements at the boundaries of the units of the normative field. The problem is to understand how sectors and levels are maintained as separate yet interdependent units. First, a range of inter-level actions is analyzed. Next, the three normative processes--prescription, reciprocity, and collaboration--are examined in detail on both sides of the boundary and at each of the normative levels.
The difference at the legal-cultural boundary is illustrated by Griswold v. Connecticut, in which the Supreme Court made explicit as legal precept what was already implicit in the moral code--the right of married persons to use contraceptives. At the legal and economic-political boundary, Mac Pherson v. Buick shows how the New York Court of Appeals imposed a principle of due care upon manufacturers' policies. The eventual importance of action at the cultural and economic-political boundary is illustrated in Chapter IV by the School Segregation Cases. There the Court bolstered efficient against traditional norms for ordering racial diversity by making explicit the creed of equality as fundamental law and imposing a doctrine of federal supremacy on citizenship questions upon states-rights ideology.
Concluding, the appropriateness and general fit of the illustrations to the theoretical model support the assumptions that appellate judges make their decisions within a patterned normative field, and that the pattern can be found and described analytically. / 2031-01-01
|
9 |
A comparative study of the meaning and importance of several constitutional cases in the highest courts of the PRC, Hong Kong, & TaiwanMorris, Robert J. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Title proper from title frame. Also available in printed format.
|
10 |
To prosecute or not to prosecute, that is the question: the Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Division's antitrust enforcement dilemma under judicial uncertaintyLi, Quan 15 May 2009 (has links)
This dissertation develops and empirically tests a theory of interaction between
the federal appellate courts and the bureaucracy with regard to bureaucratic prosecution.
Modeling the bureaucracy as a forward-looking and risk-averse institution and assuming
that there is no uncertainty at the district court level, I posit that institutional uncertainty
created by appellate courts' random assignment of judges and cases affects the
likelihood of bureaucratic prosecution. Given that the decision from a specific panel of a
circuit court can be estimated by its median judge's policy position and that the
bureaucracy does not know which panel will hear the case, there exists institutional
uncertainty at the appellate court level in terms of ideological differences among panels
represented by their median judges. I contend that increasing ideological heterogeneity
within an appellate court measured by its ideological variance among judges increases
institutional uncertainty with respect to the bureaucracy's policy position, which in turn
discourages bureaucratic prosecution. My examination of the Antitrust Division's
prosecution record from 1950 to 1994 demonstrates that ideological variance within the federal circuit courts has a significant impact on the likelihood of prosecution by the
agency. The Antitrust Division is less likely to prosecute when facing a circuit court with
large ideological variance among judges. Studies of judicial decision-making and
judicial control of the bureaucracy have not fully examined the implication of appellate
courts' institutional practice of randomly assigning judges and cases. The development
of ideological variance among circuit judges, in this project, as a measure of the
institutional uncertainty created by the random assignment process suggests that the
courts' unique institutional practice can now be fully incorporated into future studies of
the interaction between the judiciary and the bureaucracy.
|
Page generated in 0.3516 seconds