281 |
Generic insistence : Joseph Conrad and the document in selected British and American modernist fictionManocha, Nisha January 2013 (has links)
This thesis explores the citation of documents in the modernist novel. From contracts to newspaper articles, telegrams to reports, documents are invoked as interleaved texts in ways that, to date, have not been critically interrogated. I consider a range of novels, including works by Ford Madox Ford, Virginia Woolf, Nella Larsen, and Willa Cather, which are selected, in part, as a litmus of Anglo-American modernism, though they can more productively also be understood as coalescing around the example set by Joseph Conrad. Replete with allusions to documents, Conrad’s oeuvre is developed across the thesis as a meta-commentary on the document in modernist literature. In placing the document at the centre of analysis, and in using Conrad as a diagnostic of the document in modernity, the manifold ways in which authors use interpolated texts to perform denotative and connotative “work” in their narratives emerge, with the effect of revising our understanding of documents. These authors reveal the power of mass produced documents to lay claim to novelistic language; the historical role of documents in reifying inequality; on the level of narrative, the thematic potential of the document as a reiterable text; and finally, the capacity of the document, in its most depersonalized form, to realize social collectivity and community. This project therefore asks us to rethink and relocate the document as central to the modernist novel.
|
282 |
Uppmärksammad eller bortglömd? : En undersökning av myndighetsarkivariers deltagande inom e-förvaltning / Recognized or forgotten? : A study of swedish government archivists participation within e-government.Åkerlund, Malin January 2016 (has links)
This thesis examines the situation for archivists within the context of e-government in three Swedish authorities. The discussions that are brought up concern the archivists role, professional development and the perspective of information in the context of e-government. Since the purpose with this thesis was mainly concerning the situation for the archivists, the method chosen was a qualitative research method, and it was used in combination with interviews with the archivists at the chosen authorities. The results show that the archivists within the examined authorities are seen as experts on information management and legislation surrounding it. Problems connected to e-government are that they face prejudice about their capability concerning new technology and digital information. This problem has been handled differently within the authorities, change of official titles has been one tactic. Their tasks and professional development have been slightly changed as they are working in a higher capacity ahead of the information being created. The change that can be seen in the context of e-government is that archivists are being more visible within their work places, which can be correlated to the e-government that encourage team work and collaborations to create an efficient and accessible authority. What this means for the archivists is that they can use these collaborations to further their own projects and tasks within the organisation in a better way. Contrary to the belief that archivists can only manage information on paper the participants in this research prove they have adopted well to the way of e-government partly through the Record Continuum Model. They are aware about the different perspectives necessary for handling the new ways of structuring and seeing information, which became clear with the development and structure of e-archives within two of the authorities and the preparation for being connected for the third. Finally, this thesis shows that archivists are beginning to be able to compete with other departments and professions on the same terms and that they are starting to find their own place within the area of IT and information management. This is a two years master's thesis in archival science.
|
283 |
Law Catalog, 1989-1991College of Law, University of Arizona January 1989 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. LXXXII, No. 5
|
284 |
Law Catalog, 1997-2000College of Law, University of Arizona January 1997 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XC, No. 4
|
285 |
Law Catalog, 1999-2002College of Law, University of Arizona January 1999 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XCII, No. 2
|
286 |
Law Catalog, 2000-2002College of Law, University of Arizona January 2000 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XCII, No. 12
|
287 |
Law Catalog, 2001-2003College of Law, University of Arizona January 2001 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XCIV, No. 12
|
288 |
Law Catalog, 2005-2007College of Law, University of Arizona January 2006 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XXVI, No. 1
|
289 |
Law Catalog, 2008-2010College of Law, University of Arizona January 2008 (has links)
Issued as a numbered part of the University of Arizona Record: Vol. XXVIII, No. 4
|
290 |
Law Record, Vol. 1, No. 1College of Law, University of Arizona January 1980 (has links)
The University of Arizona Law Record was a semi-annual magazine for alumni and friends of the College of Law. It was published between 1980 and 1999.
|
Page generated in 0.0397 seconds