Madame de Motteville et la duchesse de Montpensier sont deux aristocrates contemporaines. La première est dame de compagnie d’Anne d’Autriche ; la seconde est cousine germaine de Louis XIV. Témoins des bouleversements liés à la Régence et à la Fronde, elles sont conduites à des questionnements parallèles. Si elles se sont passionnément intéressées à l’histoire de leur époque, elles ont fait des choix de vie individuelle qui les distinguent du commun des femmes. Chacune a adopté une forme de célibat. Ces choix de vie ont forgé en elles le désir de liberté. Ce qui crée le plus intensément leur sororité littéraire reste l’écriture de Mémoires. L’histoire les a invitées à s’interroger sur l’identité nobiliaire. La Fronde va être l’occasion historique pour la Grande Mademoiselle de revendiquer les valeurs menacées par les évolutions politiques. En cela, elle ne partage pas les idées politiques de Madame de Motteville qui va s’employer à soutenir le pouvoir légitime dans ses Mémoires. Simultanément se pose aux deux auteures la question de leur identité féminine. Madame de Motteville et Mademoiselle mettent en scène, dans leurs Mémoires, l’oppression dont les femmes sont victimes et qui tient au fonctionnement patriarcal de la société. Une fois Louis XIV au pouvoir de manière effective, les rêves de libération féminine s’évanouissent. D’où la tendance des deux mémorialistes à formuler une expérience individuée de la liberté. Le statut de femme libre peine à exister sur le plan public. Mais il demeure possible de l’inventer dans le cadre de la sphère privée. Elles vont se frayer un chemin vers la liberté en réinventant à leur manière le destin féminin, sans pour autant déboucher sur un véritable féminisme, leurs valeurs demeurant sous certains angles empreintes de traditionalisme. À l’intérieur de cette sphère privée, l’écriture mémorialiste circonscrit un deuxième espace dans lequel leur quête de liberté prend corps et s’épanouit. / Madame de Motteville and the Duchess of Montpensier were two contemporary aristocrats. The former was a lady-in-waiting to Anne of Austria; the latter was a first cousin of Louis XIV. They witnessed the upheavals caused by the Regency and the Fronde and shared a passionate interest in the history of their times. It led them to explore similar issues. They each chose a form of spinsterhood and made life choices which distinguished them from the common run of women and contributed to their desire for liberty. The main reason why they can be regarded as litterary 'sisters' is the writing of Memoirs. History made them both question their aristocratic identity, though in different ways: La Grande Mademoiselle took the opportunity of the Fronde to fight for values threatened by political changes while Madame de Motteville supported the legitimate power of the Regency through her Memoirs. They also both questioned their feminine identity. Theydealt with the oppression women suffered as a result of a patriachal society. After Louis XIV took power in 1660, hopes of feminine liberation were dashed. Hence both memorialists' tendency to seek and write about a personal experience of freedom. They could not achieve the status of 'liberated' women in the public sphere but they could try to do so in the private one. They fought their way to freedom by reinventing women's destiny in their own ways, but without defending feminist views as such, as their values remained tinged withtraditionalism. The writing of Memoirs allowed them to define within the private sphere a space in which their quest for freedom couldflourish.

No description available.

No description available.

This study examines landownership structures and settlement during the Middle Ages in the province of Östergötland in Sweden. It departs from a critical approach to the established view of social structure and property in the Scandinavian medieval society. The investigations are made at two levels. The first level is a cross section of the mid 16th century. This investigation shows that lay aristocrats and ecclesiastical institutions controlled most of the land, especially in the core areas of the parishes. The second level is a detailed investigation at the farm level in six parishes starting from the middle of the 16th century and working retrogresively to the early Middle Ages. This study shows that the landowning structure of the 16th century can be traced back to about AD 1300. For the early Middle Ages reconstructions are made through inheritance successions and genealogies of the aristocratic families. These reconstructions show that, in some parishes, most of the land was probably controlled by a few very rich families or dynasties during the early Middle Ages. The results lead to a question about the Viking Age and medieval society in general. This question is answered in a hypothesis stressing the development of the concept of land ownership in combination with the development of the land tenure system as one of the important factors for reproduction of local power during the Viking Age and early Middle Ages.

<p>This study examines landownership structures and settlement during the Middle Ages in the province of Östergötland in Sweden. It departs from a critical approach to the established view of social structure and property in the Scandinavian medieval society.</p><p>The investigations are made at two levels. The first level is a cross section of the mid 16th century. This investigation shows that lay aristocrats and ecclesiastical institutions controlled most of the land, especially in the core areas of the parishes. The second level is a detailed investigation at the farm level in six parishes starting from the middle of the 16th century and working retrogresively to the early Middle Ages. This study shows that the landowning structure of the 16th century can be traced back to about AD 1300. For the early Middle Ages reconstructions are made through inheritance successions and genealogies of the aristocratic families. These reconstructions show that, in some parishes, most of the land was probably controlled by a few very rich families or dynasties during the early Middle Ages. The results lead to a question about the Viking Age and medieval society in general. This question is answered in a hypothesis stressing the development of the concept of land ownership in combination with the development of the land tenure system as one of the important factors for reproduction of local power during the Viking Age and early Middle Ages.</p>

No description available.

Orientadores: Lidia Maria Rodrigo, Rogerio Miranda de Almeida / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-13T12:56:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Mendonca_Samuel_D.pdf: 1039928 bytes, checksum: a75b7005ab8e199160c5569fca715df8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: A pergunta que motivou a presente investigação foi formulada assim: em que consiste a educação aristocrática em Nietzsche? A tese formulada de que é possível conceber a educação aristocrática em Nietzsche por meio do perspectivismo e da autossuperação do sujeito apontou uma educação individual, do destaque, do homem solitário; educação da exceção. Essa educação que sugere a autocrítica como elemento para a autossuperação do sujeito não é para todos, mas para os que têm reverência por si. A metodologia, bibliográfica, consistiu na análise de escritos de Nietzsche e de importantes comentadores. O referencial teórico utilizado, o perspectivismo, diz respeito à proposição extraída de A Gaia Ciência, fragmento 374, de que tudo na natureza é interpretação e nada mais. Nietzsche assume a proposição segundo a qual não temos o conhecimento absoluto da verdade. A tese da educação aristocrática em Nietzsche apontou, em última instância, a produção filosófica como aristocrática. / Abstract: Abstract: The question which motivated the present investigation was formulated by this way: in what consists the aristocratic education by Nietzsche? The thesis formulated is that it is possible to understand the aristocratic education by Nietzsche from perspectivism and self-overcoming of subject ways pointed to an individual education, of separation, the lonely man; education of exception. This education that suggests the auto-critics like an element to the self-overcoming of subject is not for everyone, but for the ones who have reverence for themselves. The methodology consisted at Nietzsche writings and important commentators by bibliographic view. The theorical referential utilized, the perspectivism, is about the preposition extracted from The Gay Science, 374 fragment, that everything in nature is about interpretation, nothing more than that. Nietzsche assumes the preposition that we do not have the absolute knowledge of truth. The thesis of aristocratic education of Nietzsche pointed, at last interpretation, that the philosophic production is aristocratic. / Doutorado / Historia, Filosofia e Educação / Doutor em Educação

In the late nineteenth century, Peru began a process of political stabilization, which was based on an alliance between the coastal oligarchy and the Andean gamonales. The latter would retain control of indigenous masses in exchange for enjoying a position of power in Parliament and having jurisdiction, viathe provincial and local governments, over matters of education and health. However, as discussed in this article, in the early twentieth century, a faction of the Partido Civil sought to restore administrative centralization in order to make its educational project more feasible. This new proposal challenged the interests of regional elites, who saw a threat to their positions of power, as well as other factions of the Partido Civil. / A finales del siglo XIX, el Perú inició un proceso de estabilización política, el cual se asentó en una alianza entre los sectores oligárquicos costeños y los gamonalesa ndinos. Estos últimos mantendrían el control de las masas indígenas a cambio de disfrutar de un espacio de poder en el Parlamento y de tener competencia, vía los gobiernos provinciales y locales, en materia educativa y sanitaria. Sin embargo, como se verá en el presente artículo, a inicios del siglo XX una facció ndel Partido Civil buscó restablecer una centralización administrativa con el propósito de hacer más factible su proyecto educativo. Esta nueva propuesta se enfrentó a los intereses de las élites regionales, que veían amenazados sus espacios de poder, y a otras facciones del civilismo.

The Master's thesis follows the unusual fate of the castle library in Mikulov. This library belonging to the family of Dietrichstein-Mensdorff-Pouilly was sold off through auctions in the times of the so-called Czechoslovak First Republic (1933, 1934). A part of its stock became a property of today's Moravian provincial library in Brno and some of the old manuscripts were sold to other institutions in Czechoslovakia. The thesis focuses on the position of the aristocratic family of the Dietrichsteins which was connected with the legal institution of fideicommissum, the cancellation of which led to the selling off of the Mikulov castle library. Moreover, the thesis deals with a comparison of the above mentioned situation and the other castle library sales between the two world wars. Over 200 000 items were sold from the Mikulov library, most of them being old and valuable books. Key words: fideicommissum, Mikulov, Nicolsburg, Dietrichstein family, aristocratic libraries, history of libraries

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-04T21:01:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 4 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Com este trabalho, procuramos demonstrar que a grande política é uma das tentativas de Nietzsche para superar o niilismo. Entretanto, além de não consegui-lo, sua proposta confronta-se com a democracia liberal da segunda metade do século XIX (o que contém certa dose de razão na medida em que detecta os traços niilistas passivos contidos nesse sistema político) e com a democracia de nossos dias, negando ao sujeito uma participação efetiva na política e seus rumos na sociedade, porquanto se assenta numa estrutura hierárquica de senhores e escravos, mesmo que com conotações espirituais, e não físicas, muitas vezes expressas de modo dúbio. Uma das conseqüências imediatas dessa proposição é o enraizamento da apatia política, traço inequívoco do niilismo passivo nas sociedades pós-modernas. Inspirada nos moldes gregos arcaicos e no radicalismo aristocrático, a sociedade aristocrática vislumbrada por Nietzsche seria conduzida pelo além-do-homem, ao longo da obra metaforizado como novo filósofo, filósofo legislador e / With this work we aim to demonstrate that great politics is one of the Nietzsche’s attempts to overcome nihilism. However, apart from didn’t make it, his proposal hatchs with liberal democracy of the second half XIX century (which have a certain reason element, because detect the passive nihilist traces contained in that political system) and with democracy of our time, denying to the individual one efective participation on politics and in society tacks, because it is based on a hierarchy structure of masters and slaves, even if with spiritual meaning, and not physical, many times expressed in a dubious way. One of the immediates consequences of that proposition its the rooting of political apathy, a unmisunderstantig trace of passive nihilism on postmodern societies. Inspired on greek arcaic casts, on the aristocratic radicalism, the aristocratic society glimpsed by Nietzsche has to be conducted by the beyond-man, along the nietzschian work metaphorized as new philosopher, legislator philosopher and aristoc