Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. Vita. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliography.

The author's background is not either Calvinistic or Arminian. This study was undertaken because the author felt the need of a better understanding about Arminianism and its place in Protestantism in relation to his future work. The author recognizes that the controversy between Arminianism and Calvinism goes back to the sixteenth century and still continues among Protestants today.

No description available.

Thesis (D. Min.)--Nazarene Theological Seminary, 1990. / "Chapters three through seven are the Spanish translation of ... selections from The works of Arminius."--P. 6. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 242-243).

Thesis (M.A.)--Western Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1992. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 73-78).

Thesis (M.A.)--Western Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1992. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 73-78).

Thesis (M.A.)--Western Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1992. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 73-78).

No description available.

This thesis is a study on the theology of an Anglican bishop, John Davenant (1572-1641), in the context of the early modern era. In particular it focuses on his understanding of the extent and intent of the atoning death of Christ. Davenant played an important role in the development of early orthodox Reformed theology, especially on this controversial doctrine. Some scholars have claimed that Davenant's position was a forerunner of Amyraldianism in the seventeenth century. Others have argued that his view was different from Amyraldianism. However, no scholar has substantiated the latter argument based on Davenant's extensive writings as to how far Davenant's view on the extent of the atonement was distinct from the position of John Cameron, the Father of Amyraldianism. The contention of this thesis is that Davenant's views of predestination, the atonement and free-will were the main factors that affected his twofoldintention view, and they differed from the positions of John Cameron. The exposition of those doctrines by John Davenant both in his various writings and in his testimony at the Synod of Dort serve as the object of the investigation. Cameron's writings are also selectively investigated and his views on those doctrines are compared with Davenant's positions. The Canons of Dort are analysed in order to examine whether Davenant's doctrinal position is situated within the confessional orthodoxy in the early seventeenth century. Davenant's position on the universal aspect of the atonement was based on the universal proclamation of the Gospel. Davenant stressed the immutability of God's will for the elect. Cameron's view on the universal aspect of the atonement depended on the divine will for the salvation of every individual which could be frustrated due to human free choice. Since the decree of sending Christ preceded the decree of election according to Cameron's view on the order of the divine decrees, Cameron's view was different from Davenant's. Cameron held to a distinction between moral and physical ability and intellectual persuasion of the Holy Spirit upon the human mind. These things were not shared by Davenant. The conclusion arrived at is that Davenant's twofold-intention view was distinct from Cameron's hypothetical universalism. Thus this study substantiates the claim that Davenant was not a forerunner of Amyraldianism and his view was situated within the boundary of confessional orthodoxy codified in the Canons of Dort.

Thesis (M. Div.)--Trinity International University, 2008. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-79).