In this work the author has focused on meeting with the process of assigning public contracts, on detail monitoring of the composition and number of quali-fying prerequisites and on evaluation criteria. To analyze such prerequisites and criteria the author used data from public contract information sub-system. Sub-sequently the gained information were processed and evaluated, including spe-cific projects. Eventually, based on the collected data, the author suggested gen-erally suitable structure of qualification prerequisites and evaluation criteria.

This thesis is focused on the evaluation process of procurement and its very detailed mapping regarding to example of qualifications, assessing bids in terms of ratings according to different methods. For the analysis of selected public contracts, the author used informations from the information system on public procurement, which is accessible to the entire job, including all relevant requirements. On the basis of this contract evaluation was conducted using three methods and their comparison. Furthermore, part of the thesis is to design a fictional version based on the same public contract, in which are also collected additional sub-criteria and information. On the basis of these findings and the criteria is carried out further evaluation and is observed difference from the original version.