Yes / This paper explores the relationship between news media sentiment and spillover effects in the cryptocurrency market. By employing a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model, we initially develop measures of spillover specific to individual cryptocurrencies. Subsequently, we employ unique data on cryptocurrency-specific sentiment to assess its impact on these spillover measures using panel fixed effects regression analysis. Our findings indicate that news media sentiment plays a significant role in explaining the spillover dynamics within the cryptocurrency market. Unlike traditional assets, it appears that only positive sentiment affects the spillovers among cryptocurrencies, suggesting an asymmetric effect. Taking into account various characteristics of cryptocurrencies, we find that sentiment’s impact on spillover is more pronounced in community-based coins than in those driven by firms. An examination of news content suggests that sentiment pertaining to emotional and risk aspects of cryptocurrencies predominantly influences these spillovers. Additionally, a comparative analysis of sentiment derived from social media and traditional news sources reveals a stronger influence of the former on spillover effects. Through extensive robustness checks, our research consistently affirms the pivotal role of sentiment in driving spillovers among cryptocurrency returns, underlining the importance of sentiment analysis in understanding the dynamics of the cryptocurrency market. / The full-text of this article will be released for public view at the end of the publisher embargo on 11 Sep 2025.

This thesis focuses on impact of jumps and simultaneous jumps (co-jumps) in asset prices on future volatility. Our main contribution to the empirical literature lies in the use of panel Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) model that allows us to obtain average effect of jumps for both the portfolio of 29 U.S. stocks and 8 individual market sectors our stocks belong to. On top of that we investigate the effect of sign for both jumps and co-jumps. The estimation results indicate that the impact of jumps on future volatility is positive whereas for co-jumps it is negative. We also document tendency of downward jumps and co-jumps to be followed by increase in volatility and that upward jumps and co-jumps are followed by decrease in volatility. Finally, results for individual sectors reveal that estimated effects vary across industries - for cyclical sectors volatility is in general more sensitive to negative jumps and less sensitive to positive jumps than for defensive sectors.