Column-supported embankments with or without basal geosynthetic reinforcement can be used in soft ground conditions to reduce settlement by transferring the embankment load to the columns through stress redistribution above and below the foundation subgrade level. Column-supported embankments are typically used to accelerate construction and/or protect adjacent facilities from additional settlement. The column elements consist of driven piles or formed-in-place columns that are installed in an array to support a bridging layer or load transfer platform. The bridging layer is constructed to enhance load transfer using several feet of compacted sand or sand and gravel that may include one or more layers of high-strength geotextile or geogrid reinforcement. Mobilization of the mechanisms of load transfer in a column-supported embankment requires some amount of differential settlement between the columns and the embankment as well as between the columns and the foundation soil. When the embankment height is low relative to the clear spacing between columns, there is the risk of poor ride quality due to the reflection of the differential foundation settlement at the surface of the embankment. The minimum embankment height where differential surface settlement does not occur for a particular width and spacing of column is the critical height. The conventional approach is to express critical height as a fixed ratio of the clear span between adjacent columns; however, there is no consensus on what ratio to use and whether a single ratio is applicable to all realistic column arrangements. The primary objective of this research is to improve the understanding of how column-supported embankments deform in response to differential foundation settlement. A bench-scale experimental apparatus was constructed and the equipment, materials, instrumentation, and test procedures are described. The apparatus was able to precisely measure the deformation occurring at the sample surface in response to differential settlement at the base of the sample. Critical heights were determined for five combinations of column diameter and spacing representing a wide range of possible column arrangements. In addition, tests were performed using four different column diameters in a single column configuration with ability to measure the load acting on the column and apply a surcharge pressure to the sample. In total, 183 bench-scale tests were performed over a range of sample heights, sample densities, and reinforcement stiffnesses. Three-dimensional numerical analyses were conducted to model the experiments. The critical heights calculated using the numerical model agreed with the experimental results. The results of the laboratory tests and numerical analyses indicate that critical height depends on the width and spacing of the columns and is not significantly influenced by the density of the embankment fill or the presence of reinforcement. A new method to estimate critical height was developed and validated against extensive case histories as well as experimental studies and numerical analyses performed by others. / Ph. D.

Increasing interest, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and other agencies, in using deep-mixing methods (DMM) to improve the stability of levees constructed on soft ground is driven by the need to reduce levee footprints and environmental impacts and to allow for more rapid construction. Suitable methods for analysis and design of these systems are needed to ensure that the DMM technology is properly applied. DMM shear walls oriented perpendicular to the levee alignment are an effective arrangement for supporting unbalanced lateral loads. Shear walls constructed by overlapping individual DMM columns installed with single-axis or multiple axis equipment include vertical joints caused by the reduced width of the wall at the overlap between adjacent columns. These joints can be made weaker by misalignment during construction, which reduces the efficiency of the overlap. Depending on the prevalence and strength of these joints, complex failure mechanisms, such as racking due to slipping along vertical joints between adjacent installations in the shear walls, can occur. Ordinary limit equilibrium analyses only account for a composite shearing failure mode; whereas, numerical stress-strain analyses can account for other failure modes. Five case studies provided by the USACE were analyzed to evaluate the behavior of levee and floodwall systems founded on soft ground stabilized with DMM shear walls. These identified and illustrated potential failure mechanisms of these types of systems. Two-dimensional numerical stability and settlement analyses were performed for the case studies using the FLAC computer program. The key findings and conclusions for the individual case studies were assessed and integrated into general conclusions about design of deep-mixing support for levees and floodwalls. One of the significant findings from this research was to identify the potential for a partial depth racking failure, which can control design when the DMM shear walls are socketted into a relatively strong bearing layer. The potential for partial depth racking failure is not discussed in the literature and represents a new failure mode identified by this research. This discovery also highlights the importance of adapting suitable methods for analysis and design of these systems to address all potential failure modes. / Ph. D.

When an embankment is to be constructed over ground that is too soft or compressible to adequately support the embankment, columns of strong material can be placed in the soft ground to provide the necessary support by transferring the embankment load to a firm stratum. This technology is known as column-supported embankments (CSEs). A geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform (LTP) or bridging layer may be constructed immediately above the columns to help transfer the load from the embankment to the columns. There are two principal reasons to use CSEs: 1) accelerated construction compared to more conventional construction methods such as prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) or staged construction, and 2) protection of adjacent facilities from distress, such as settlement of existing pavements when a roadway is being widened. One of the most significant obstacles limiting the use of CSEs is the lack of a standard design procedure which has been properly validated. This report and the testing described herein were undertaken to help resolve some of the uncertainty regarding CSE design procedures in light of the advantages of the CSE technology and potential for significant contributions to the Strategic Highway Research Program, which include accelerated construction and long-lived facilities. Twelve design/analysis procedures are described in this report, and ratings are assigned based on information available in the literature. A test facility was constructed and the facility, instrumentation, materials, equipment, and test procedures are described. A total of 5 CSE tests were conducted with 2 ft diameter columns in a square array. The first test had a column center-to-center spacing of 10 ft and the remaining four tests had center-to-center spacings of 6 ft. The Adapted Terzaghi Method of determining the vertical stress on the geosynthetic reinforcement and the Parabolic Method of determining the tension in the geosynthetic reinforcement provide the best agreement with the test results. The tests also illustrate the importance of soft soil support in CSE performance and behavior. A generalized formulation of the Adapted Terzaghi Method for any column/unit cell geometry and two layers of embankment fill is presented, and two new formulations of the Parabolic Method for triangular arrangements is described. A recommended design procedure is presented which includes use of the GeogridBridge Excel workbook described by Filz and Smith (2006, 2007), which was adapted for both square and triangular column arrangements. GeogridBridge uses the Adapted Terzaghi Method and the Parabolic Method in a load-displacement compatibility design approach. For completeness, recommended quality control and quality assurance procedures are also provided, and a new guide specification is presented. / Ph. D.

Column-supported embankments (CSE) enable accelerated construction on soft soils, high performance, and protection of adjacent facilities. The foundation columns transfer embankment and service loading to a competent stratum at depth such that loading on the soft soil can be reduced. This has the beneficial effects of reducing settlement and lateral displacement, and improving stability. Selection of column type depends on the design load, cost, constructability, etc., although unreinforced concrete columns are commonly used. A load transfer platform (LTP) is often included at the embankment base. This is a layer of coarse-grained fill that may include one or more layers of geosynthetic reinforcement. The LTP improves vertical load transfer to columns by mobilizing the shear strength of the LTP fill and the membrane effect of the geosynthetic. The geosynthetic reinforcement also responds in tension to lateral spreading. Herein, lateral spreading is defined as the lateral displacements occurring in response to lateral earth pressures in the embankment and foundation. Excessive lateral spreading can lead to bending failure of the concrete columns, tensile failure of the geosynthetic reinforcement, and instability of the system. Design procedures recommend inclusion of geosynthetic reinforcement to mitigate lateral spreading, with assumptions for the lateral thrust distribution, failure mode, and calculation of geosynthetic tensile capacity. The necessity and sufficiency of these assumptions have not been fully validated. In addition, unreinforced concrete columns have low tensile strength and can fail in bending, but recommendations for calculating column bending moments are not available. This research examines the limitations in CSE lateral spreading design with the goal of advancing fundamental understanding of lateral spreading mechanics. The research was performed using three-dimensional finite difference analyses. Limiting conditions for lateral spreading analysis were identified using case history records, and an undrained-dissipated approach was validated for the numerical analysis of limiting conditions (i.e., undrained end-of-construction and long-term excess pore pressure dissipated). The numerical model was calibrated using a well-documented case history. Additional analyses of the case history were performed to examine the lateral earth pressures in the foundation, column bending moments, and geosynthetic contribution to resisting lateral spreading. A parametric study was conducted to examine the lateral thrust distribution in 128 CSE scenarios. A refined substructure model was adopted for analyzing peak geosynthetic tensions and strains. Lastly, failure analyses were performed to examine the effect of different CSE design parameters on embankment failure height, failure mode, and deformations. The research produced qualitative and quantitative information about the following: (1) the percent thrust resistance provided by the geosynthetic as a function of its stiffness; (2) the geosynthetic contribution to ultimate and serviceability limit states; (3) the change in lateral thrust distribution throughout the embankment system before and after dissipation of excess pore water pressures; (4) the column-soil interactions involved in embankment failure; and (5) identification of two failure modes in the undrained condition. Design guidance based on these findings is provided. / Doctor of Philosophy / Column-supported embankments (CSEs) have been designated by the Federal Highway Administration as a critical technology for new highway alignment projects and widening of existing highways. CSEs enable accelerated construction and high performance in weak soils, which are factors critical to project success. In a CSE, columns are installed in the weak soil, followed by rapid construction of the soil embankment that provides the necessary elevation and foundation for the roadway. The columns transfer most of the embankment and traffic loading to a competent soil stratum at depth. Concrete without steel reinforcement is commonly used to construct the columns, although material selection depends on cost, constructability, expected load, etc. Layers of geosynthetic reinforcement can also be included at the embankment base. The geosynthetics help to transfer loads to the columns and resist excessive movement that could lead to instability. The entire embankment system should be designed for safety and economy. This research was motivated by uncertainties in design to mitigate lateral spreading. Lateral spreading refers to lateral displacements occurring in response to lateral earth pressures in the embankment and foundation. Excessive lateral spreading can lead to failure of the columns, geosynthetic reinforcement, and the entire embankment system. This research aims to advance fundamental understanding of lateral spreading in CSEs and to re-evaluate current design assumptions. Corresponding design guidance is provided.