Thesis advisor: Fabio Ghironi / This thesis includes two essays that analyze some features of the past financial crises. In the first chapter I study the possible reasons why investors reduced their holdings of foreign equities, and, at the same time, they increased their holdings of short-term government bonds, during the 2007 financial crisis that first hit the U.S. economy and soon became a world crisis. More precisely I analyze how the increases in uncertainty during the crisis affected capital flows. I use a two country DSGE model and I assume that there is trade in both goods and financial assets. I assume that each country is allowed to issue equities and government bonds, and I assume that each economy is hit by three types of shocks: Preference, productivity and government spending shocks. I proxy the increase in uncertainty with the introduction of uncertainty shocks, i.e. I allow the variances of the shocks to be time-varying. My findings show that uncertainty is a source of portfolio-dynamics that can contribute to explain, together with the other sources already identified in the literature, deviations of the portfolio from its steady-state. Investors choose their portfolio with the goal to smooth consumption. Therefore they want to hold assets with returns that display a negative covariance with consumption. When uncertainty shocks hit, the way in which the real variables of the model covary with asset returns changes. As a consequence, agents need to re-adjust their portfolios until when the shock has disappeared. I also show under which conditions it is rational for investors to increase their holdings of foreign government bonds and, at the same time, reduce their holdings of foreign equity, in response to an increase in global uncertainty. My findings show that the response of the portfolio to an increase in uncertainty crucially depends on the source of uncertainty. If uncertainty comes from aggregate demand, it is optimal for agents to increase their holdings of foreign bonds and reduce their holdings of foreign equity. If instead the source of uncertainty is aggregate supply, agents find it optimal to increase their holdings of foreign equity and reduce their holdings of foreign bonds. This finding suggests that the movements of capital that took place during the crisis are compatible with an increase in uncertainty coming from aggregate demand. This result is supported by those theories that identify the collapse in demand as the main cause of the slump experienced by the U.S. and by many other economies during the crisis. In the second chapter I study the currency denomination of the debt in emerging countries. Empirical studies have shown that emerging countries are often characterized by the presence of a high share of foreign currency denominated debt. As the debt crises of the 1990s show, the presence of foreign currency debt can be risky because, beyond creating a mismatch in the domestic firms' balance sheets, it also constraints the traditional domestic policy instruments in dealing with home and foreign economic shocks. The reasons why such risky forms of international finance arise in the first place remain an open question. If foreign debt is so dangerous-as it is-it may be worth trying to give a micro-foundation to its emergence. Such a high share of foreign currency debt should be at least in part justified by the presence of some private benefits for the agents that choose this form of finance. The goal of this chapter is to rationalize the choice to borrow in dollars rather than in domestic currency on the international markets. In order to do so, I study how informational asymmetries and heterogeneous expectations can affect the choice of a borrower to expose herself to a currency risk. Furthermore I look at the policy implications of my findings to understand which policies could reduce the incentive of agents to dollarize. My model is a portfolio choice model with asymmetric information that analyzes how agents choose the currency denomination of their debt. The main findings of my model show that when domestic agents have a high informational advantage and/or there is a low level of transparency on international markets, an increase in the degree of dollarization might be observed, if the fundamentals are relatively strong. Alternatively, if there is endogeneity between the exchange rate policy implemented by the monetary authority and domestic agents' decisions, a certain degree of complementarity in borrowers' choices may arise, thus creating a phenomenon of {it moral hazard}. If domestic agents know that a high share of dollar debt in the economy makes the exchange rate more rigid, they may want to coordinate on the equilibrium where all the corporate debt in the economy is denominated in the same currency, even when the fundamentals of the economy are relatively weak. These results have interesting policy implications. A benevolent central bank that strongly bases her policy on the degree of dollarization in the economy, can generate a coordination mechanism among the domestic borrowers that results in a risky degree of dollarization. The solution would be to ex-ante choose a central banker with a strong preference for a flexible exchange rate. My findings also show the importance of transparency. Transparency does not necessarily coincide with public information. My model actually shows that the precision of private sources of information determines the degree of dollarization. If international markets could have access to some sources of private information, they would be more willing to lend in pesos, when the fundamentals are relatively strong. As a consequence the economy would not experience high levels of dollarization and would be better protected against future negative shocks. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2011. / Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Economics.

Diss.--Heidelberg--Ruprecht-Karl-Universität, 2006. / Bibliogr. p. 137-145.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2003. / Supervisor: P. Dean Corbae. Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Available also from UMI Company.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of South Carolina, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 194-206).

Thesis (doctoral)--Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. / Description based on print version record.

Thesis (M.Phil.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 104-105). Also available in electronic version.

viii, 83 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. / My thesis begins by acknowledging the fact that our time is marked by crisis. Although this seems, to most, undeniable, I argue that because we lack the criterion for legitimating this claim, appeals to crisis are always susceptible to ideological appropriation and misuse. Hence, the thesis strives to articulate a space of critical reflection in which the legitimate diagnosis of crises may be possible. To this end, I turn to the tradition of continental philosophy, appraising the efforts of Karl Marx, Jurgen Habermas, and Jacques Derrida. While each of these thinkers offers a unique critique of crisis, I argue that they nevertheless succumb to what I call "crisis consciousness" - a condition in which the perception of crisis is inseparable from that of powerlessness. / Adviser: Cheyney Ryan

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Cornell University, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references.

published_or_final_version / Politics and Public Administration / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2007. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains iv, 91 p. : ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 35-36).