1 |
Die Stellung des Verteidigers im solothurnischen Strafprozessrecht /Bannwart, Urs. January 1974 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Bern.
|
2 |
Die Frage des Ausschlusses des Verteidigers von der Verteidigung /Kirschner, Karl. January 1935 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Frankfurt am Main.
|
3 |
Die gerichtliche Fürsorgepflicht im Strafverfahren : Darstellung der nicht normierten Prozesspflichten insbesondere des Strafgerichtes gegenüber dem Angeklagten /Kumlehn, Rolf, January 1976 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Göttingen, 1976. / Includes bibliographical references (p. x-xx).
|
4 |
Die Begründung der Beschuldigteneigenschaft im Strafverfahren /Heydebreck, Tessen von. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Göttingen.
|
5 |
Die notwendige Verteidigung und ihre Weiterentwicklung in den Entwürfen zur Strafprozessordnung /Kreitmair, Jakob. January 1930 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Erlangen, 1930. / Includes bibliographical references (p. v-vi).
|
6 |
Die Grenzen, die das Strafrecht dem Anwalt in seiner Tätigkeit als VerteidigerziehtKuster, Werner. January 1925 (has links)
Inaug. Diss. -- Freiburg i.B. / Bibliography: p. v-vi.
|
7 |
Premenstrual syndrome as a substantive criminal defenceGore, Sally, 1979- January 2003 (has links)
It is now over twenty years since the criminal trials of two women caught the attention of the British media. Sandra Craddock (later Smith) and Christine English both raised a successful defence of diminished responsibility based on premenstrual syndrome to a murder charge. In these cases the Court of Appeal apparently determined that PMS is a factor that can limit criminal responsibility. Although this thesis concentrates on the situation as it exists in English law, many of its conclusions are equally relevant to other legal systems, particularly those in common law jurisdictions. / The issues that are likely to arise in a criminal trial in which a defendant wishes to base a substantive defence on premenstrual syndrome can be condensed into five central questions: (i) Does premenstrual syndrome exist at all? (ii) If so, does the defendant suffer from the condition? (iii) Did PMS cause or contribute to the defendant's actions? (iv) If the answer to (iii) is yes, should the act be excused? (v) If so, under what category of excuse? This thesis will discuss the way in which these questions might best be approached. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
|
8 |
Das Schweigen des Angeklagten im englischen Strafprozess /Ferraris, Eric R. M. January 1971 (has links)
Inaug.--Diss--Zürich. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 8-11).
|
9 |
Le défenseur du roi Raymond de Sèze (1748-1828) ...Sevin, André, January 1936 (has links)
Thèse--Universit́e de Bordeaux. / "Bibliographie": p. [xix]-xxvi.
|
10 |
Jury trials in misdemeanor cases of driving under the influence of alcohol a public policy consideration /Smith, Richard Milton. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (M.J.S.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 2002. / "May 2002." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-86). Online version available on the World Wide Web.
|
Page generated in 0.0896 seconds