Univ., Diss.--Köln, 2004. / Literaturverz. S. XXVII - XXXIX.

No description available.

The derivational morphology of Munsee Delaware, an Eastern Algonquian language spoken in southwestern Ontario, is analysed and described. Chapter I presents general information about Delaware, including a summary of grammatical information necessary for the understanding of word structure. The theoretical constructs assumed are summarized. A distinction is made between primary derivation, in which suffixes are attached to roots (and affixes) to form stems; and secondary derivation, in which suffixes are attached to stems to form new stems. Inflectional affixes are attached to stems which are formed in primary or secondary derivation. Chapter II discusses verb-forming suffixes ('finals') added to roots and certain suffixes to form verb stems. Chapter III discusses verb-forming suffixes which attach to existing noun and verb stems to form verb stems (secondary derivation). Chapter IV discusses 'medials', which prototypically occur between roots and 'final' suffixes. Chapter V discusses noun-forming suffixes which are attached to roots and medials. Chapter VI discusses noun-forming suffixes which attach to existing noun and verb stems to form noun stems (secondary derivation). Chapter VII discusses bound variants of noun stems, morphological elements which occur as members of morphologically complex noun stems.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Delaware, 2010. / Principal faculty advisor: Barbara Curry, School of Education. Includes bibliographical references.

Presented as a master's thesis, University of Chicago. cf. Pref. / Bibliography: p. 94-106.

Thesis--Rice University. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 263-276).

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Delaware, 2006. / Principal faculty advisor: Robert Hampel, School of Education. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Delaware, 2007. / Principal faculty advisor: Rebecca J. Sheppard, School of Urban Affairs & Public Policy. Includes bibliographical references.

Memoria para optar al título profesional de Ingeniera en Recursos Naturales Renovables / Los Derechos de Aprovechamiento de Aguas (DAA) no consuntivos en Chile, han sido foco de preocupación debido a los efectos que puede tener la oncentración de su propiedad. Esto llevó a una serie de procesos judiciales e institucionales que concluyeron en la emisión de un documento por parte de la DGA, donde se señala que la propiedad de los DAA no consuntivos no estaría concentrada. Sin embargo, muchos de los titulares de estos derechos corresponden a personas jurídicas que se conectan entre sí mediante relaciones patrimoniales que harían que esta atomización sea relativa. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la concentración de los DAA no consuntivos, describiendo su concentración patrimonial y territorial. La concentración patrimonial se evaluó identificando las relaciones patrimoniales de los 144 titulares de DAA con más de 16 m3/s. Para esto se consultaron en el Conservador de Bienes Raíces de Santiago, el Archivo Judicial y el Diario Oficial, los accionistas mayoritarios y directores de aquellos titulares que son sociedades comerciales, reagrupando aquellas que compartieran accionistas y/o más de 2 directores. Tanto a los datos iniciales como a los titulares reagrupados, se les aplicó el índice de Herfindahl Hirschman para evaluar la concentración de los DAA no consuntivos. Este índice se aplicó también para evaluar la concentración territorial, que se realizó con la información proveniente del Catastro Público de Aguas de la DGA actualizado a noviembre de 2013. Se encontraron relaciones patrimoniales en 32 titulares, reduciendo los grandes titulares de 144 a 124. La concentración de la propiedad del agua no consuntiva a nivel nacional alcanzó valores bajos de IHH, que si bien aumenta al doble con la reagrupación de titulares, no alcanza niveles concentrados con un IHH de 801 que representa un 69,0 % del volumen de agua en propiedad de 124 titulares. Respecto a la concentración territorial, se presentaron niveles moderados-altos de concentración en 10 de las 15 regiones del país, con entre 2 a 5 grandes titulares por región. Se concluye que si bien a nivel nacional existen niveles bajos de concentración de DAA no consuntivos, a nivel regional la concentración es mayor. Además se hace necesario revisar el CPA debido a inconsistencias de la información tanto de caudal como en los titulares encontradas en los DAA no consuntivos. A nivel de titulares, se debe profundizar en las sociedades accionistas para construir la red completa y transparente de conglomerados que poseen los DAA. / Non-consumptive water rights in Chile have been a concern because of the concentration of their property may cause. This has led to a set of judicial and institutional processes which resulted in the issuance of a document from the Dirección General de Aguas (DGA), which concludes that the non-consumptive water rights’ property was not concentrated. However many of the rights’ holders correspond to a legal entity who are connected together through ownership, making this concentration a debatable issue. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the concentration of non-consumptive water rights, describing their patrimonial and territorial concentrations. The patrimonial concentration was evaluated through identifying the property relationships of 144 holders which have water rights for more than 16 m3/s. The Conservador de Bienes Raíces de Santiago, the Archivo Judicial and the Diario Oficial were consulted for the main shareholders and members of companies’ boards those that shared main shareholders and/or at least 2 directors. Initial and regrouped information was submitted to the Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI) to evaluate the concentration of non-consumptive water rights. This index was also used to evaluate territorial concentration, using information from Catastro Público de Aguas (CPA) of DGA updated to November 2013. Holders were reduced from 144 to 124 with the 32 patrimonial relationships founded between them. The concentration of non-consumptive water rights showed low levels of HHI at national scale and although it doubled with the regrouping of owners, it did not reach concentrated levels with an HHI of 801 which represents 69,0 % of water flow owned by 124 holders. Regarding about territorial concentration, moderate and high levels of concentration were found in 10 out of 15 country regions, with 2 to 5 big holders per region. It is concluded that while at a national scale low levels of non-consumptive water rights concentration exist, the concentrations increases at regional scale. Also that CPA needs to be reviewed due to inconsistencies on the information regarding water flow as well as holders in non-consumptive water rights. At holders level, deeper research should be done to build a complete and transparent network of conglomerates that own the nonconsumptive water rights.