1 |
R & D project selection and scheduling /Coffin, Mark Anthony, January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1992. / Vita. Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 147-151). Also available via the Internet.
|
2 |
The Federal make-or-buy policy: an analysis of factors affecting the efficiency of the government R & D contracting-out.Bhanich Supapol, Atipol, Carleton University. Dissertation. Economics. January 1988 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Carleton University, 1988. / Also available in electronic format on the Internet.
|
3 |
Competence change in contract R & D : analysis of project nets /Seppänen, Veikko. January 2000 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (doctoral)--University of Oulu, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 216-226). Also available on the World Wide Web.
|
4 |
Endogenous R&D, R&D cooperation, and mode of foreign expansionTongrut, Ruttaya. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2004. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-178). Also available on the Internet.
|
5 |
Endogenous R&D, R&D cooperation, and mode of foreign expansion /Tongrut, Ruttaya. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2004. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 175-178). Also available on the Internet.
|
6 |
The impact of federal R&D obligations on the U.S. States' economies /Lin, Wei, January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Texas at Dallas, 2008. / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 197-201)
|
7 |
Integrating the Department of Defense military services' technology development programs to improve time, cost, and technical quality parametersAdams, Barry D. January 2007 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in Systems Engineering)--Naval Postgraduate School, March 2007. / Thesis Advisor(s): Thomas D. Fiorino, Tom Huynh. "March 2007." Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-90). Also available in print.
|
8 |
R & D project selection and schedulingCoffin, Mark Anthony 06 June 2008 (has links)
Research and Development (R&D) project selection has been the focus of much research attention and the literature on this subject is extensive. Numerous models have been proposed to facilitate the selection of R&D projects, and these models have been both qualitative and quantitative in nature. Various project goals are typically included in the selection process. For goals that can be developed as mathematical functions, models have been developed that determine optimal solutions efficiently. However, when project goals cannot be structured as linear or nonlinear functions, or to do so would make the solution of the model complex or even impossible, the models presented in the literature either make simplifying assumptions about these goals, or do not include them in the model.
One goal that cannot be structured in an optimization format, is scheduling of projects through the R&D process. The nature of scheduling is such that it is difficult to include in any of the existing quantitative selection models, and the result is that scheduling goals are either considered after the projects have been selected, or they are not included at all.
In this research an R&D selection model is developed that incorporates the scheduling of individual projects as one of several goals. The model is designed to reflect a realistic R&D situation, in terms of problem size, goals, objectives, and, constraints. In order to incorporate a scheduling goal, the model uses a heuristic approach to determine a solution. The validity of the solutions, as well as the computational complexity of the model are explored. / Ph. D.
|
9 |
Optimal contract of research and development.January 1994 (has links)
by Wong Tak-Kwong. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1994. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 76-81). / Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 2 --- Literature Review --- p.7 / Chapter 3 --- R&D Activities and Competing for a Researcher --- p.12 / Chapter 3.1 --- Licensing Decision of a Successful Innovator --- p.16 / Benefits of Firm i with Licensing / Benefits of Firm j with Licensing / Chapter 3.2 --- Competing for the Researcher --- p.23 / Characterization of Equilibrium / Chapter 3.3 --- Concluding Remark --- p.29 / Chapter 4 --- Innovation from An Independent Researcher --- p.30 / Chapter 4.1 --- Licensing with Bargaining --- p.34 / Licensing Decision of the Researcher / Licensing Decision of Firm i / Licensing Decision of Firm j / Chapter 4.2 --- Ownership Re-allocation --- p.44 / Chapter 4.3 --- Concluding Remark --- p.48 / Chapter 5 --- An Analysis of Sequential Innovation --- p.50 / Chapter 5.1 --- Choices of Licensing and Conducting R&D --- p.55 / Decision of the Follower / Licensing by the Successful Innovator / Chapter 5.2 --- Equilibrium of Sequential R&D --- p.65 / Chapter 5.3 --- Simultaneous R&D or Sequential R&D --- p.68 / Chapter 5.4 --- Concluding Remark --- p.74 / Chapter 6 --- Conclusion --- p.75 / Chapter 7 --- Bibliography --- p.76
|
10 |
Options theory as a framework for decision-making in R & D investments.Lounsbury, H. Bruce (Hugh Bruce), Carleton University. Dissertation. Management Studies. January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (M.M.S)--Carleton University, 1992. / Also available in electronic format on the Internet.
|
Page generated in 0.0998 seconds