Dialysis patients are operated to have AV Fistula which is a joint junction of an artery and vein in the arm, operated to increase the blood flow through the dialyzer machine. AV- fistula is a type of vascular access which is a path into the body to connect/disconnect devices, but in this case, it is mainly Dialyzer. To reduce the failure rate during maturation period of AV Fistula, doctors recommend squeezing ball exercise as a necessary precaution for AV Fistula failure. Doing Squeezable interaction for about 3-4 times a day is recommended based on patient’s health condition. Hence, the proposed architecture adopts this squeezable exercise by embedding with sensor and measuring the angle at which the sensor is bent. The framework also proposes a new care coordination system having the hardware layer which has key components such as raspberry Pi, sensor which help in recording the pressure values when user presses the ball and software layer which solely focuses on data sync among the applications used by the user. It has been recorded that 53 % of patients having AV-Fistula fail because of negligence and lack of care. The maturation period is so critical and important which made us to build a gamification platform to monitor the exercise and track the activity through android application to keep users motivated and disciplined. In further chapters of the study will focus on different clinical like procedure around AV-Fistula and technical information such as different technologies used and implemented in the proposed system along with sensor circuit. This project goal is to present a way of monitoring patients and to keep track of the compliance whether the patient is active doing exercise daily. This way we are trying to present a care monitoring system for patients to help prevent AV Fistula failure. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2019. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

Albumin provides the vital scaffolding for growth and tissue repair and supports oncotic blood pressure and hemodynamics. In hemodialysis patients, albumin aids with fluid removal by drawing excess fluid from edematous tissues back into the blood where it can then be removed by a dialyzer. The hyperglycemia seen in dialysis patients with Type II diabetes progressively damages kidney glomeruli, which permits albumin seepage into the urine, thus lowering serum albumin. The conceptual framework underpinning this research is the van't Hoff theory of osmotic pressure. Under this framework, the solute-solvent relationship largely contributes to the osmotic movement of fluid. The purpose of this study was to determine if albumin levels differed in Hispanics on dialysis with and without diabetes and if potential differences existed over time. Differences in diabetes incidence in Hispanics suggest albumin levels may be dissimilar. Albumin physiology is abundant in the literature; how and to what magnitude albumin levels are affected in patients with diabetes is unclear. This quantitative, retrospective cohort study employed ANOVA, Repeated Measures t tests, Spearman Correlation, and regression analysis to evaluate potential associations between the research variables. Data were extracted from CMS-2728 forms to amass the final cohort (N = 827). Differences in albumin levels at the first 2 intervals were observed (Baseline 1.29 -± 0.49 mg/dL, F = 2.28, p < .032; 3 months 0.47 -±0.41 mg/dL, F = 1.62, p < .004). Covariables (hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and infections) were controlled for but showed inconclusive results. Lower serum albumin in Hispanic dialysis patients with diabetes provides the impetus for developing ethnic-specific albumin therapies, thus promoting positive social change.

Introduction: Forty years ago the life saving and life prolonging therapy of dialysis was rationed. It was extremely unlikely that people aged over 50 years would be offered treatment. Today, those aged over 65 years are becoming the fastest growing group of patients on dialysis. Changing population demographics and referral patterns, the opening up of eligibility for dialysis to high risk individuals, refinement and developments in dialysis technology and its ‘success’ in keeping more patients alive for longer periods, along with rising public expectation, are just some of the reasons behind this change in the age profile of those being currently treated for kidney failure. Older people are likely to have multiple co-morbidities and decreased functional status that may complicate their decision-making about dialysis and limit their treatment options. / Enhancing choice and involvement in treatment decision-making to the patient’s satisfaction is a central theme of health care ethics. Current national and international ethical guidelines about the initiation of dialysis recommend shared or joint decision-making and discuss patient ‘benefit’ and patient ‘need’. This project sought to determine how these recommendations, and other ethical issues related to informed consent, possible withdrawal of treatment and quality of life, were embodied in the personal experiences of a group of older people facing dialysis decisions. / Aim: The general aim of this research was to follow the dialysis decision-making process over time amongst a group of people aged 65 years and older. More specifically, this research sought to explore with the participants the following issues: what factors impacted on their dialysis decision-making; how they understood both what was happening to them and the goals of treatment; their preferences for information seeking; how they perceived any future decision-making; how or whether the commencement and experience of dialysis influenced their decision-making; and once treatment had been initiated, how they felt about their initial decisions. / Method: A predominantly longitudinal qualitative study was undertaken. Meetings were conducted prior to the potential initiation of dialysis with 21 participants. These meetings involved a semi-structured interview and the administration of three questionnaires focusing on preferences for decision-making, information seeking and quality of life. Data was also collected from the participants’ health records. For those participants who commenced dialysis a further two meetings were undertaken one month and then six months after treatment was instigated. The qualitative data was analysed thematically using concepts that had either been pre-determined and explored within the interviews or, had emerged from the participants’ stories. / Findings: Findings from this study include: participants not feeling that they had a choice about dialysis; a mismatch between theoretical expectations of informed consent and shared decision-making and the ‘actor centred experiential’ model of decision-making adopted by participants; a need to re-evaluate the balance and relationships between physiological measures of effectiveness emphasised by health professionals, and psychosocial and functional markers valued by participants; and treatment goals not being individually negotiated. / Conclusion: An interest in remaining alive was the driving force behind why participants chose to have dialysis. Other factors impacting on decisions about dialysis were multi-faceted and were based on priorities other than what health professionals consider important. Shared decision-making, as described in the literature, is not unproblematic. However, health professionals need to accept the underlying premises on which shared decision-making is based so that they can find out what expectations patients have of treatment, beyond that of saving life. Such expectations need to be discussed with patients and the various treatment options need to be negotiated in an attempt to achieve patients’ goals. Patients should be encouraged however to be involved in decision-making to the extent to which they desire.