This thesis is called “Citation needed – the perceived credibility of Wikipedia among higheducation students”. The purpose of this thesis is to discover the opinions about the credibilityof Wikipedia among high education students. The assumption is that students are aware ofbeing source criticizing and do not directly cite Wikipedia in academic works. The main research question is: what are the views of the perceived credibility of theinformation on Wikipedia among high education students? The theoretical framework is made out of previous research specific related to Wikipediabut also theories around memory creation, assessment of sources and credibility. The method used is qualitative, with semi-structured interviews. The material consists ofinterviews with nine participants. Their answers are transcribed and presented in themes andthen analyzed. The main results are that the perceived credibility of the information on Wikipedia amongthe students is that it is fairly credible and their views of the encyclopedia are that it is fastupdated and neutral. They also believe that Wikipedia isn’t for academic usage so in allaspects the students do not make a thoroughly assessment of the encyclopedia’s credibility. Further implications are that Wikipedia would be ruined if anyone tried to make itacademic. Wikipedia fulfills an educational tool for the public even though it is not alwayscorrect. It is important to be reminded that Wikipedia contains errors but no other source iscompletely flawless either. In that sense it would be smarter to start a new encyclopedia, ifthere is such a need, perhaps open for professors only and would in the end only containvetted information, however mostly/only in academic fields. The length of the thesis is 56 pages in total and approximately 21 000 words. Keywords: Wikipedia, encyclopedias, source criticism, credibility, Nationalencyclopedin,students, in-depth interviews.

Pair programming is an agile software development practice that can be used in university student's education when learning programming. Previous research on students at universities has shown that there exist different perceived benefits and drawbacks on the practice’s contribution to learning. However, these research are few and no similar studies have been conducted at KTH. A research gap has therefore emerged, which this thesis intends to fill and potentially lead to the subject being more relevant to, for example, Swedish universities. This creates the problem question: “How do students at KTH perceive the benefits and drawbacks of pair programming from a learning perspective, and how do these compare to previous studies?”. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the students' perceived benefits and drawbacks of pair programming at KTH from a learning perspective. The thesis goal is to expand the study on students' perceived benefits and drawbacks of pair programming from a learning perspective, as well as contribute to the knowledge of pair programming. The research methods chosen for the thesis are previous literature studies and qualitative in-depth interviews with eight students at KTH. The results are presented as summerazitations and tables of collected data on KTH students' perceptions on the benefits and drawbacks of pair programming from a learning perspective. The main benefits and their circumstances identified were better perspective, qualitative code and faster progress. Drawbacks and their circumstances on the other hand, were identified as various levels of experience, difference in personal preference, different time schedules and difficulties in alternating roles and changing partners. These results indicate that pair programming contributes much when learning programming, but that there also exist perceived drawbacks by KTH students. / Parprogrammering är en agil praxis inom mjukvaruutveckling som kan användas i universitetsstudenters utbildning när de lär sig programmering. Tidigare forskning på universitetsstudenter har visat att det finns olika upplevda fördelar och nackdelar med praktikens bidrag till lärande. Dessa undersökningar är dock få och inga liknande studier har gjorts på KTH. Ett forskningsgap har därmed uppstått, som denna avhandling avser att fylla och potentiellt leda till att ämnet blir mer relevant vid, exempelvis, svenska universitet. Detta leder till problemfrågan: ”Hur uppfattar studenter på KTH fördelarna och nackdelarna med parprogrammering ur ett lärandeperspektiv, och hur är dem i jämförelse med tidigare studier?”. Syftet med uppsatsen är att utforska studenters upplevda fördelar och nackdelar med parprogrammering på KTH ur ett lärandeperspektiv. Forskningens mål är att utöka studien om studenters upplevda fördelar och nackdelar med parprogrammering ur ett lärandeperspektiv, samt bidra till kunskapen om parprogrammering. De forskningsmetoder som valts ut är tidigare litteraturstudier och kvalitativa djupintervjuer med åtta studenter på KTH. Resultaten presenteras som sammanfattningar och tabeller över insamlad data om KTH-studenters uppfattningar om fördelar och nackdelar med parprogrammering ur ett lärandeperspektiv. De främsta fördelarna och deras omständigheter som identifierades var bättre perspektiv, kvalitativ kod och snabbare framsteg. Nackdelar och deras omständigheter identifierades däremot som olika nivåer av erfarenhet, olika personliga preferenser, olika tidsscheman, svårigheter med alternerande roller och byte av partner. Dessa resultat tyder på att parprogrammering bidrar mycket till lärandet av parprogrammering, men att det också finns nackdelar uppfattade av KTH-studenter.