Advances in hearing instrument technology have permitted the development of non-linear prescriptive methods to prescribe amplification characteristics for the hearing- impaired individual. The dispenser’s task in selecting the most appropriate prescriptive procedure for the young child is of utmost importance to ensure optimum hearing aid benefit for communication development. It was the aim of this study to compare and describe the effect of the two most widely used methods, DSL (i/o) and NAL-NL1, on speech recognition and loudness perception. An exploratory, descriptive research design was selected to realise this goal. Ten participants were selected using a convenient non-probability method of sampling. Articulation index calculations and a closed set speech recognition test were utilised in the evaluation of speech recognition, whereas functional gain results and loudness rating measurements provided an opportunity to describe loudness perception. The obtained results were analysed using the SAS (Statistical Analysis System). The study concluded that, although significant statistical differences existed in loudness perception, no statistical difference was observed in actual speech recognition measures. This effect may contribute to the individual amplification approaches of the two methods, which seem to reflect the uncertainties expressed by researchers as to the contribution of high frequency amplification to speech recognition in young children. / Dissertation (M (Communication Pathology))--University of Pretoria, 2006. / Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology / Unrestricted

A substantial body of research points to the benefits of fitting hearing instruments that provides extended high frequency amplification. Most published research were done on adults or in controlled laboratory settings. It is therefore necessary for peadiatric audiologists to critically assess the effects that this extended high frequency amplification has on the individual child fitted with hearing instruments. A quantitative research method was selected to explore the possible correlations between extended high frequency amplification and the influence this extended high frequency amplification has on speech recognition and functional performance in children with mild to severe sensory neural hearing loss. A quasiexperimental design was selected. This design accommodated a one-group (single-system) pre-test versus post-test design. Baseline assessments were done and all participants were subjected to pre- and post-intervention assessments. Six participants were fitted with hearing instruments which provided extended high frequency amplification. A baseline assessment was done with current hearing instruments after which participants were assessed with the hearing instruments with extended high frequency amplification. Aided audiological assessments were done without the extended high frequencies after which participants were evaluated with the added high frequencies. Speech recognition testing and functional performance questionnaires were used to compare the outcomes obtained with and without the extended high frequency amplification. A t-test was used for hypothesis testing to determine if extended range amplification increased speech recognition abilities and functional performance, and if these increases were statistically significant. Results were varied where some participants performed better and some performed worse with the added extended range amplification during speech recognition testing and functional performances observed at home. These varied results were statistically insignificant. However, statistically significant evidence was obtained to indicate that extended high frequency amplification increased the functional performance observed at school. The study concluded that the paediatric audiologist should know the effect fitting hearing instruments capable of extended high frequency amplification have on speech recognition abilities and functional performances. Fitting hearing instruments with extended high frequency amplification should however be done with caution because not all children benefited from extended bandwidth amplification. This underlines the importance of following a strict evidence-based approach that incorporates objective and subjective assessment approaches. This will provide the paediatric audiologist with real world evidence of the success of the amplification strategy that is followed. / Dissertation (MCommunication Pathology)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology / Unrestricted