Syfte: Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka hur nöjda patienter var med den vård de fått på en klinisk utbildningsavdelning, KUA, och om det fanns skillnader mellan hur nöjda män och kvinnor var med vården. Metod: Data samlades in via enkäter där patienter fick skatta nio olika påståenden samt besvara tre frågor med egna ord. Enkäterna besvarades av 33 patienter. Svaren på de öppna frågorna analyserades med innehållsanalys. Deskriptiv statistik användes för att beskriva patienternas tillfredsställelse med vården. För att påvisa eventuella skillnader i upplevelsen av vårdkvalitet mellan män och kvinnor användes Mann Whitney U-test. Resultat: Resultatet visade att patienterna var mycket nöjda med vården de fått på KUA. Vårdkvaliteten skattades högt och patienterna upplevde framför allt att de blivit positivt bemötta, känt sig trygga vid provtagningar och undersökningar samt fått tillräckligt mycket information inför operationen. Det visade sig att det fanns en signifikant skillnad mellan hur män och kvinnor upplevde informationen de fått efter operationen. De kvinnliga patienterna upplevde i högre grad än männen att de fått tillräcklig information. Slutsats: Vårdkvaliteten på KUA var hög. Det fanns en signifikant skillnad mellan hur män och kvinnor upplevde informationen efter operationen men andra signifikanta skillnader i upplevelser saknades.

Collaborative practice in the healthcare system is of global interest to become cost-efficient and adaptable towards health care needs due to more complex challenges and shortages in qualified health workers. Health-sciences education should provide interprofessional education to promote learning for collaborative practice in their curricula. The interprofessional training ward is one form of interprofessional education in the clinical setting. Previous studies in the field of interprofessional education focused on self-reports by students. The focus on students leads to a lack of the supervisor´s perspective in interprofessional education. The aim of this study is to get insides of the supervisor´s perspective on how they perceive their work. This study was conducted with a qualitative methods approach with semi-structured interviews. Main results of this study were in different areas. Power relations between managers, supervisors, and students show a big impact about supervisor´s work satisfaction from appreciation from the managers. Supervisors usually feel appreciated by students but lack of appreciation from managers can lead to distress and decreased satisfaction. Supervisors go through different stages during their work period: First they have low confidence in their job role, after a period of time they are confident, but after a long period of time they can get tired of their work. The conclusion is even though the interprofessional training wards have already a lot of positive aspects, the managers should always remember themselves to support this kind of setting. Without the support of the managers, the whole project decreases its quality and the supervisor’s satisfaction.

Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-18T13:27:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2017 / Introdução: As deformidades craniofaciais apresentam-se como uma situação complexa com consequências psicológicas, fisiológicas e sociais que exigem a intervenção de uma equipe com variados profissionais, como médicos, cirurgiões dentistas, nutricionistas, psicólogos e assistentes sociais, na perspectiva de uma equipe de Prática Colaborativa. Neste contexto, não tem como não mencionar a Formação Interprofissional para esta prática. Esta modalidade de Currículo Inovador, seja em graduação, pós-graduação, formação continuada ou em formação permanente tem sido um desafio atualmente. Segundo a OMS, a educação interprofissional ocorre quando estudantes de duas ou mais profissões aprendem sobre os outros, com os outros e entre si para possibilitar a colaboração eficaz e melhorar os resultados na saúde. Objetivo geral: Investigar o processo de formação e educação permanente para o trabalho em equipe de docentes e discentes que atuam na atenção a pacientes com deformidades craniofaciais com vistas à prática colaborativa e à integralidade do cuidado. Objetivos específicos: Apreender as concepções de trabalho em equipe e prática colaborativa de profissionais que atuam em deformidades craniofaciais, levantar as dificuldades vivenciadas pelos profissionais no seu processo de educação permanente como uma equipe de saúde, e avaliar a incorporação da Educação Interprofissional (EIP) à educação permanente das equipes. Método: O estudo foi quali-quantitativo, de natureza descritiva e exploratória, observando-se os preceitos éticos. A pesquisa se deu em duas etapas: a primeira foi a aplicação do Instrumento Atitudinal do tipo Likert respondido por 36 profissionais, sendo este construído com 3 dimensões fundamentadas nos objetivos do estudo. A segunda etapa foi a realização de entrevistas semi-estruturadas feitas com 15 profissionais (número que se deu pela saturação das informações). Os dados do Likert foram analisados estatisticamente e o conteúdo das entrevistas por meio de análise de conteúdo, modalidade temática e os dados posteriormente triangulados. Resultados: Os respondentes, em sua maioria, concordam com a eficácia do Trabalho em Equipe Colaborativo e entendem que esta prática deve ser melhorada, com a necessidade de intersecção de áreas de atuação profissional no cotidiano de suas atividades e com a importância do planejamento conjunto de ações, entendendo que este ponto deve ser intensificado. Diante das dificuldades vivenciadas na Educação Permanente da Equipe, observa-se um predomínio do enfoque multiprofissional de atuação, a predominância de um modelo de educação permanente multiprofissional, a necessidade de práticas com horários protegidos, formação e atuação interprofissional com metodologias inovadoras, existência de variáveis como falta de tempo, poucos recursos, individualismo, falta de motivação pessoal que atrapalham a EP da equipe. Em relação à Educação Interprofissional, os profissionais confundem EIP com formação fragmentada multiprofissional, reconhecem a EIP como uma estratégia de formação que possibilita que os mesmos adquiram um perfil holístico de atuação e saiam mais preparados para atuar em equipes com perfil colaborativo, percebem que a EIP melhora as relações profissionais, aumenta a resolutividade, diminui custos, diminui estresse, humaniza a relação profissional/paciente. Conclusões: Esperamos que este estudo subsidie propostas de intervenção, de forma dialogada, que permitam a constante evolução do atendimento a pacientes com deformidades craniofaciais, em relação à comunidade e instituições congêneres. / Introduction: Craniofacial deformities present a complex situation with psychological, physiological and social consequences that require the intervention of a team with a variety of professionals, such as physicians, dental surgeons, nutritionists, psychologists, social workers, from the perspective of a team of one Collaborative Practice. In this context, it is impossible not to mention the Interprofessional Training for this practice. This modality of Innovative Curriculum, whether in undergraduate, postgraduate, continuing education or in permanent formation has been a challenge today. According to WHO, inter-professional education occurs when students from two or more professions learn about each other, with each other and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes. General objective: To investigate the process of formation and permanent education for the teamwork of teachers and students who work in the care of patients with craniofacial deformities with a view to collaborative practice and integral care. Specific objectives: To understand the conceptions of team work and collaborative practice of professionals who work on craniofacial deformities, to raise the difficulties experienced by professionals in their process of permanent education as a health team, and value the incorporation of Interprofessional Education (EIP) to the permanent education of the teams. Method: The study was qualitative and quantitative, of descriptive and exploratory nature, observing the ethical precepts. The research was carried out in two stages: first was the application of the Likert type Attitudinal Instrument where 36 professionals answered, being this one constructed with 3 dimensions based on the objectives of the study. The second step was semi-structured interviews with 15 professionals (a number that occurred due to saturation of information). Likert data were analyzed statistically and content of the interviews by content analysis, thematic modality and the later triangulated data. Results: Respondents, for the most part, agree with the effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork and understand that this practice should be improved, with the need to intersect areas of professional activity in the daily life of its activities and with the importance of joint planning of actions, understanding that this point should be intensified. Faced with the difficulties experienced in the Permanent Education of the Team, a predominance of the multiprofessional approach of action is observed, the predominance of a multiprofessional permanent education model; The need for practices with protected schedules, training and interprofessional work and with innovative methodologies, existence of variables such as lack of time, few resources, individualism, lack of personal motivation that disrupt the EP of the team. In relation to Interprofessional Education, professionals confuse IPE with fragmented multiprofessional training, recognize the IPE as a training strategy that allows them to acquire a holistic profile of performance and leave more prepared to act in teams with a collaborative profile, perceive that IPE improves professional relationships, increases resolution, decreases costs, reduces stress, humanizes the professional / patient relationship. Conclusions: We hope that this study will subsidize intervention proposals, in a dialogical way, that allow the constant evolution of care for patients with craniofacial deformities, relationship with the community and similar institutions.

The stigma of mental illness endorsed by healthcare professionals has been linked to adverse outcomes. This issue underscores the need for early anti-stigma interventions in the context of professional training. The present study measured stigma change and suicide screening behaviors among medical, nursing, and pharmacy students enrolled in an interprofessional Communication Skills for Healthcare Professionals course. The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS; Evans-Lacko et al., 2010), Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC; Modgill, Patten, Knaak, Kassam, & Szeto, 2014), and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale Form C (M-C SDS Form C; Reynolds, 1982) was administered at baseline (T1), a mid-semester assessment (T2), and post-intervention (T3) to 176 students. Post-intervention changes in stigma components (knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intent) were mixed for all groups. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intent did not predict whether students screened for suicidal ideation (p > .05). Findings from the present study support past research indicating that the stigma can be improved with appropriate intervention. Findings also support interprofessional training as an appropriate context for anti-stigma interventions. Currently, there is no general consensus regarding the best method and combination of tools to measure stigma among healthcare students. Additionally, the relationship between stigma and screening for suicidal ideation is an important area for further scientific inquiry.

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) is a way to make students in healthcare professions equipped with the collaborative skills required for today’s complex healthcare. In clinical placements students from health profession programs can learn with, from and about each other so that they can collaborate effectively and deliver high-quality healthcare. The interprofessional education is possible through supervision from health professions who collaborate around the student learning and the patient healthcare.  Aim: The aim of this study is to gain knowledge about the learning process in IPE that take place in an Interprofessional Training ward (IPTW) from the supervisor teams’ perspective.  Method: In an IPTW students from occupational therapist-, physiotherapist-, medical- and nursing programs form teams for IPE in periods of two weeks with supervisor teams. With an inductive method, interviews with focus groups consisting of supervisor teams have been conducted and analyzed through thematic analysis.  Results: Based on the supervisor teams' experiences of creating interprofessional learning with student teams in the daily work with the care of patients, a learning process has been made visible. This learning process has been written out as a model and analyzed using known obstacles and enablers for IPE from supervisor perspective. The model has also been interpreted through pedagogical theory that has been used in IPE. Conclusion: The supervisor teams use a learning process with pedagogical models and strategies to handle obstacles and enablers to create understanding and change towards an interprofessional collaboration among the students. These models and strategies are supported by pedagogical theory. There is a gap in research on how IPE is carried out by interprofessional supervisor teams’, however the findings of this study contribute with new knowledge about how a learning process can be used in IPE.