• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 5
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 6
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Vom Zwang zur Wahl: der Zusammenhang zwischen Wohlstand und Fertilität im Wandel der Zeit

Sax, Christoph January 2006 (has links)
Zugl.: Basel, Univ., Diss., 2006
2

Institutionelle Bestimmungsfaktoren der Fertilität /

Tagge, Sven. January 2008 (has links)
Zugl.: Halle-Wittenberg, Universiẗat, Diss., 2007.
3

Nachhaltigkeit in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung was leistet die kinderzahlabhängige Rente?

Pfaffenbach, Stefan January 2008 (has links)
Zugl.: Darmstadt, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2008
4

Nachhaltigkeit in der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung : was leistet die kinderzahlabhängige Rente? /

Pfaffenbach, Stefan. January 2009 (has links)
Zugl.: Darmstadt, Techn. Universiẗat, Diss., 2008.
5

Sozioökonomische Konsequenzen der Fertilität Folgen der Geburt von Kindern für die Wohlfahrt von Paarhaushalten

Schulze, Alexander January 2008 (has links)
Zugl.: Mainz, Univ., Diss., 2008
6

Misleading policy messages derived from the period TFR: Should we stop using it?

Thomas, Sobotka, Lutz, Wolfgang January 2011 (has links) (PDF)
Discussions about fertility in developed countries refer almost exclusively to the period Total Fertility Rate (TFR). We argue that the use of this indicator frequently leads to incorrect interpretation of period fertility levels and trends, resulting in distorted policy conclusions and, potentially, in misguided policies. We illustrate this with four policy-relevant examples, drawn from contemporary Europe. These illustrations show that the TFR (a) inflates the presumed gap between fertility intentions and realised fertility, (b) erroneously suggests a significant fertility increase in many countries of Europe after the year 2000, (c) often exaggerates the level of immigrants fertility and (d) frequently suggests that family-related policies which led to shorter birth spacing in fact brought an upward swing in fertility level. There seems to be no policy-relevant question for which the period TFR would be the indicator of choice to be preferred over other existing measures.

Page generated in 0.0561 seconds