Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in adults and the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women. In South Africa, breast cancer accounts for 38.5% of cancers diagnosed in women. Since the presence, extent and location of distant metastases is one important prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), accurate staging at diagnosis is crucial to ensure patients receive the appropriate treatment. Increasing evidence shows that the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for disease staging of LABC may improve diagnostic sensitivity. Aim: To prospectively assess the difference in diagnostic accuracy between whole-body PET/PET-CT and conventional imagine (CI) for staging LABC. Methods: A total of 42 participants with clinical stage III and a select few stage II breast cancer underwent both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CI. Results: 18F-FDG PET/CT found significantly more (p=0.0077) distant metastatic sites than CI (36% vs. 21%). 18F-FDG PET/CT upstaged 9 (21.4%) of patients from clinical stage IIIa to stage IIIc, and changed management of 54% of patients. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of the patients had their clinical stage unchanged. One of 5 suspected metastatic sites 18F FDG PET/CT was positive for malignancy on biopsy. Conclusion: The 18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for staging locally advanced non-inflammatory infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT was superior to conventional imaging in assessing metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy, but with a poor specificity. The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in LABC is useful, with the biopsy of isolated suspicious lesions for metastasis increasing its accuracy.

Determinar o valor prognóstico e preditivo do VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) e do HIF-1? (Hypoxia-inducible factor-1) em relação à sobrevida livre de doença (SLD) e sobrevida global (SG) em pacientes com carcinoma de mama localmente avançado (CMLA) tratadas primariamente pela quimioterapia neoadjuvante. MATERIAIS E METODOS: VEGF e HIF foram quantificados consecutivamente em plasma de 36 pacientes com CMLA pelo método de ELISA (enzyme labeling immunoassay absorbant) para o VEGF165 e o HIF-1?. O tratamento neoadjuvante foi realizado em todas as pacientes com docetaxel e epirrubicina. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 56 meses. RESULTADOS: Uma análise univariada demonstrou que o HIF-1? está significantemente relacionado à SLD (P =.0238) e à SG (P = .0121) com as pacientes HER-2 positivas. Não houve diferença significante para a SLD ou SG no que diz respeito aos receptores de hormônio, comprometimento axilar ou grau tumoral. Os valores de VEGF foram maiores no grupo de pacientes RE+ do que no grupo RE negativo (P =.01). Inversamente os valores de HIF-1? foram menores no grupo RE+ comparados ao grupo RE - (P =.02). Pacientes com recorrência óssea apresentaram uma tendência a apresentarem valores de VEGF menores (media, 175.7 pg/ml) do que aquelas com recorrência visceral (441 pg/ml). Uma análise multivariada demonstrou o comprometimento axilar (P =.0004), receptores de estrógeno (ER) (P < .0001), e tamanho do tumor (P = .0085) como fatores independentes de SLD. O HIF-1? foi tido como um fator independente preditivo de SG (P =.0180). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os valores plasmáticos de HIF-1? ou VEGF nos períodos pré e pós quimioterapia. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que o nível plasmático do HIF-1? é preditivo de SLD e SG nas pacientes com CMLA apresentando uma sobreposição as pacientes HER-2 positivas. As dosagens de VEGF podem ser preditivas de resposta e prognóstico no tratamento neoadjuvante, mas são necessários novos estudos prospectivos comparados ao HIF-1? para conclusões mais consistentes. / To determine the predictive and prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1?) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) primarily submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF and HIF were quantitatively measured in plasma sample from 36 consecutive patients with LABC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF165 and HIF-1?. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients as docetaxel and epirrubicin. The follow-up median time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that HIF-1? is a significant predictor of RFS ( P = .0238) and OS (P = 0121) in HER-2 positive patients. No significant difference was seen in RFS or OS related to hormonal receptor, axillary status or tumoral grade. The VEGF level was higher in the group of patients who ER was positive than ER negative (P = .01). On the other hand, the HIF-1? level is higher in ER negative patients than ER positive ( P=.02). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF plasma level (median, 175.7 pg/ml) than patients with visceral metastasis (441 pg/ml). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P = .0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < .0001), and tumor size (P = .0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. HIF-1? was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P = .0180). No statistically differences were observed related to pre and post chemotherapy period in HIF-1? or VEGF measurements. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that high level of plasma HIF-1? is associated to HER-2 over expression and they are major predictive factors of RFS and OS in LABC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after neoadjuvant treatment, however further studies in a prospective setting with HIF-1? homologous treatments are required.

Determinar o valor prognóstico e preditivo do VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) e do HIF-1? (Hypoxia-inducible factor-1) em relação à sobrevida livre de doença (SLD) e sobrevida global (SG) em pacientes com carcinoma de mama localmente avançado (CMLA) tratadas primariamente pela quimioterapia neoadjuvante. MATERIAIS E METODOS: VEGF e HIF foram quantificados consecutivamente em plasma de 36 pacientes com CMLA pelo método de ELISA (enzyme labeling immunoassay absorbant) para o VEGF165 e o HIF-1?. O tratamento neoadjuvante foi realizado em todas as pacientes com docetaxel e epirrubicina. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 56 meses. RESULTADOS: Uma análise univariada demonstrou que o HIF-1? está significantemente relacionado à SLD (P =.0238) e à SG (P = .0121) com as pacientes HER-2 positivas. Não houve diferença significante para a SLD ou SG no que diz respeito aos receptores de hormônio, comprometimento axilar ou grau tumoral. Os valores de VEGF foram maiores no grupo de pacientes RE+ do que no grupo RE negativo (P =.01). Inversamente os valores de HIF-1? foram menores no grupo RE+ comparados ao grupo RE - (P =.02). Pacientes com recorrência óssea apresentaram uma tendência a apresentarem valores de VEGF menores (media, 175.7 pg/ml) do que aquelas com recorrência visceral (441 pg/ml). Uma análise multivariada demonstrou o comprometimento axilar (P =.0004), receptores de estrógeno (ER) (P < .0001), e tamanho do tumor (P = .0085) como fatores independentes de SLD. O HIF-1? foi tido como um fator independente preditivo de SG (P =.0180). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os valores plasmáticos de HIF-1? ou VEGF nos períodos pré e pós quimioterapia. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que o nível plasmático do HIF-1? é preditivo de SLD e SG nas pacientes com CMLA apresentando uma sobreposição as pacientes HER-2 positivas. As dosagens de VEGF podem ser preditivas de resposta e prognóstico no tratamento neoadjuvante, mas são necessários novos estudos prospectivos comparados ao HIF-1? para conclusões mais consistentes. / To determine the predictive and prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1?) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) primarily submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF and HIF were quantitatively measured in plasma sample from 36 consecutive patients with LABC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF165 and HIF-1?. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients as docetaxel and epirrubicin. The follow-up median time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that HIF-1? is a significant predictor of RFS ( P = .0238) and OS (P = 0121) in HER-2 positive patients. No significant difference was seen in RFS or OS related to hormonal receptor, axillary status or tumoral grade. The VEGF level was higher in the group of patients who ER was positive than ER negative (P = .01). On the other hand, the HIF-1? level is higher in ER negative patients than ER positive ( P=.02). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF plasma level (median, 175.7 pg/ml) than patients with visceral metastasis (441 pg/ml). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P = .0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < .0001), and tumor size (P = .0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. HIF-1? was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P = .0180). No statistically differences were observed related to pre and post chemotherapy period in HIF-1? or VEGF measurements. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that high level of plasma HIF-1? is associated to HER-2 over expression and they are major predictive factors of RFS and OS in LABC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after neoadjuvant treatment, however further studies in a prospective setting with HIF-1? homologous treatments are required.