Spelling suggestions: "subject:"logic off"" "subject:"logic oof""
1 |
What is constant in logic?Van den Broek, Brian. January 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Logica magna (Tractatus de suppositionibus) /Paolo, Perreiah, Alan R. January 1971 (has links)
Originally part of the editor's thesis, Indiana University, 1966. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
Ueber die beziehungen zwischen katagorien und urteilsformen Erster theil einer demnächst erscheinenden schrift: Ueber die metaphysische deduktion der katagorien ...Jacobson, Julius, January 1877 (has links)
Inaug.-diss.--Königsberg. / Lebenslauf. No more published?
|
4 |
Wittgenstein and the justification of deduction陳浩文, Chan, Ho-mun. January 1987 (has links)
published_or_final_version / abstract / toc / Philosophy / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
5 |
What is constant in logic?Van den Broek, Brian. January 2005 (has links)
The thesis opens with an account of the origins of the modern problem of the demarcation of the logical constants in Alfred Tarski's 1936 lecture "On the Concept of Logical Consequence". Focus then shifts to the logical notions, to free the investigation from parochialism. John Etchemendy's recent challenge to the demarcation project is discussed and rejected. The thesis then surveys various methodological issues, conceptions of the aims and purposes of logic, and needed technical concepts. This provides the requisite tools to carry out the evaluation of existing demarcation proposals. Three groups of demarcation proposals are elaborated and evaluated. / First are model-theoretic proposals, which attempt to define the logical notions as those whose extensions are held fixed under various classes of morphisms on the domains on models for logic. Next are the proof-theoretic proposals which attempt to define the logical notions as those whose meanings can be fixed by inference rules. Last, various other proposals which do not fall into any general grouping are discussed. In all cases, the proposed demarcations are rejected, either due to internal technical considerations, or because the demarcation offered will not suffice to meet the aims and purposes of logic. / Finally, the thesis turns to arguments that there could not be a unique demarcation of the logical notions which serves all of the central purposes of logic. Further, it is argued that disputes over the nature of logic are subject to a particular intractability, as a dispute over logic is, at least in part, a dispute over the norms under which disputes are to be carried out; thus we have strong reason to doubt that there could be a demarcation that would resolve the debates. I conclude that logic is, at base, an irreducibly interest-relative and pragmatic affair.
|
6 |
Beiträge zur feststellung der beziehungen zwischen den logischen und ethischen Prinzipien ...Scheler, Max, January 1899 (has links)
Inaug.-Dis.--Jena.
|
7 |
Ueber die beziehungen zwischen katagorien und urteilsformen Erster theil einer demnächst erscheinenden schrift: Ueber die metaphysische deduktion der katagorien ...Jacobson, Julius, January 1877 (has links)
Inaug.-diss.--Königsberg. / Lebenslauf. No more published?
|
8 |
Logica magna (Tractatus de suppositionibus) /Paolo, Perreiah, Alan R. January 1971 (has links)
Originally part of the editor's thesis, Indiana University, 1966. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
9 |
Topics in the logic of entailmentHenry, Dennis Robert. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis--Wisconsin. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaf 150).
|
10 |
Beiträge zur feststellung der beziehungen zwischen den logischen und ethischen Prinzipien ...Scheler, Max, January 1899 (has links)
Inaug.-Dis.--Jena.
|
Page generated in 0.0618 seconds