none

Orientador: Adriana Nunes Ferreira / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-26T23:07:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Albuquerque_DiogoD.B._M.pdf: 2351852 bytes, checksum: b146dbb052defcd92e3d033473101df8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 / Resumo: A presente dissertação tem como objetivo apresentar as teorias do ciclo econômico elaboradas por Kalecki e Schumpeter, expor as suas diferenças e destacar seus pontos de convergência. Por meio de uma análise sistemática das obras destes autores, se averiguou que eles se distinguiram no enfoque sobre o tema. Kalecki apresentou uma teoria do ciclo baseada em um estudo sobre a demanda, enquanto Schumpeter demonstrou o ciclo por meio da sua análise sobre a oferta. Esses autores serviram de referência para diversos estudos sobre o tema, entre eles os realizados por Possas e Minsky, que também têm suas teorias aqui expostas. Pretendeu-se demonstrar como Possas e Minsky conseguiram reunir elementos Kaleckianos e Schumpeterianos para compor suas respectivas teorias. Por fim, defende-se que as teorias de Kalecki e Schumpeter sobre o ciclo econômico são complementares e que as teorias elaboradas por Possas e Minsky ajudam a comprovar esta conclusão / Abstract: The present dissertation aims to present the business cycle theories elaborated by Kalecki and Schumpeter, expose them differences and highlight their points of convergence. Through a systematic analysis of the works of those authors, it was checked that they have distinguished themselves in the focus on the subject. Kalecki presented a theory of the cycle based on a study of the demand, while Schumpeter demonstrated the cycle through its analysis of the offer. These authors served as reference to several studies on this topic, including those made by Possas and Minsky, who also have their theories here exposed. It was intended to demonstrate how Possas and Minsky managed to gather Kaleckians and Schumpeterians insights to compose their respective theories. Finally, argues that Kalecki and Schumpeter's theories about the economic cycle are complementary and that theories developed by Possas and Minsky helped substantiate to this conclusion / Mestrado / Teoria Economica / Mestre em Ciências Econômicas

The thesis analyses a dispute of two anarchist movements promoting Anarcho-Capitalism and an automated non-monetary economy. It asks the question whether the dispute can be explained in terms of paradigm conflict and not exclusively in political terms . The goal is to search for signs of scientific paradigm in an apparently ideological dispute. The thesis also examines the reasons why did the debate deteriorate into a personal and moral conflict of the representatives. The method of analysis is Grounded Theory, with reference to authors who interpret Kuhn's paradigm conflict as the consequence of an unconscious language barrier. Paradigm was operationally defined as a hierarchy of concepts with physical reference, theoretical network of the concepts and the scientific field objectives. The field objectives are the only reliable reference points between paradigms. The thesis sums up the debate between Anarcho-Capitalists and proponents of Resource-Based Economy and recovers the scientific answers and field objectives which were demanded yet missing in the debate. The thesis concludes that the debate can legitimately continue and that the ideological differences were mostly caused by a different scope of technical instruments and their describing paradigms, regardless of historical origin and...