Submitted by Maike Costa (maiksebas@gmail.com) on 2016-01-13T13:43:24Z No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 932615 bytes, checksum: 7231bf77033ff94bb42abbed1ff955eb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-13T13:43:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 932615 bytes, checksum: 7231bf77033ff94bb42abbed1ff955eb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-24 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / This work investigates the construction of authorship in final course monographs of Letras major based on reported speech schemes. To do this, we follow enunciative postulates, more precisely, from The Bakhtin Circle and dialoguing with studies under Dialogic Theory/Analysis of Speech, among them, Faraco (2005); Amorim (2006); Brait (2006); Francelino (2007; 2011); Cunha (2008); Fiorin (2008); Grillo (2010); Sobral (2012; 2013); Aran (2014), and also Discourse Analysis studies, more precisely, Orlandi (2000; 2001); Tfouni (2006); Possenti (2001; 2009; 2013). Methodologically, this research is characterized as documentary and bibliographic with a descriptive and interpretative character. The corpus consists of five monographs produced by Lettras students. Specifically, the research aims to: (i) identify and describe linguistic, discursive and enunciative schemes of another's speech transmission employed in the monographic genre; (ii) to discuss issues arising from speech schemes that shape the authorship in the construction of meanings on the monographic genre. According to our analysis, another's speech incorporation schemes establish the authorship from the following aspects: (1) the author manages consonant and dissonant voices that are involved in their enunciation; (2) the author creates borders establishing an alternation between the reported speech and the speech that is reporting; (3) the author infiltrates his/her expressive-evaluative tone in another‟s speech; (4) the author places the discourse of the other as a parameter/basis for evaluate a particular event. The schemes to seize and transmission anothers's speech are ways in which language indicates the impressions of another's speech and marks the subjectivity of the speaker. Thus, monograph genre is like a stage in which, voices, style, compositional structure and objectal-semantic content is built from the meeting between speeches. That is, in building the theme, the speaker-author mobilizes anothers‟s speeches which he/she replies, agrees, polemicizes, etc... / Este trabalho investiga a constituição da autoria no gênero discursivo monografia de conclusão do curso de Letras, a partir dos esquemas de discurso citado. Utiliza, para isso, os postulados advindos dos estudos enunciativos, mais precisamente do Círculo de Bakhtin e dialoga com estudos realizados no âmbito da Análise/Teoria Dialógica do Discurso (ADD), entre eles, Faraco (2005); Amorim (2006); Brait (2006); Francelino (2007; 2011); Cunha (2008); Fiorin (2008); Grillo (2010); Sobral (2012; 2013); Arán (2014), e, também, da Análise do Discurso (AD), mais precisamente, Orlandi (2000; 2001); Tfouni (2006); Possenti (2001; 2009; 2013). Metodologicamente, a pesquisa caracteriza-se como documental e bibliográfica, de caráter descritivo e interpretativo. O corpus é composto por cinco monografias de conclusão de curso produzidas por estudantes do curso de Letras. De forma específica, a pesquisa objetiva: (i) identificar e descrever os esquemas linguístico-discursivo-enunciativos de transmissão do discurso de outrem mobilizados no gênero monográfico; (ii) discutir aspectos decorrentes dos esquemas de discurso citado que configuram a autoria no processo de construção de sentidos do gênero monográfico. As conclusões das análises mostram que os esquemas de apreensão do discurso de outrem instauram a autoria a partir dos seguintes aspectos: (1) o autor administra as vozes consonantes e dissonantes que atravessam sua enunciação; (2) o autor cria fronteiras, estabelecendo alternância entre o discurso citante e o discurso citado; (3) o autor infiltra sua entonação expressivo-valorativa no discurso do outro; (4) o autor posiciona o discurso do outro como parâmetro/base para avaliar determinado evento. Os esquemas de apreensão e transmissão do discurso de outrem são formas pelas quais a língua registra a impressão acerca do discurso de outrem e marca a subjetividade do locutor. Assim, o gênero monografia é palco do encontro entre vozes, em que o estilo, a construção composicional, o conteúdo semântico-objetal desse enunciado é construído a partir do encontro entre discursos. Ou seja, ao construir o tema, o sujeito-autor mobiliza outros discursos, aos quais responde, com os quais concorda e/ou polemiza, etc..

Submitted by Maike Costa (maiksebas@gmail.com) on 2017-06-29T13:16:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 5298255 bytes, checksum: 86813ce5eab1b4b77b7cc4359031e69c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-29T13:16:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 5298255 bytes, checksum: 86813ce5eab1b4b77b7cc4359031e69c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-24 / The subject of this work is the use of a lightweight markup language (Markdown) to write dissertations and theses according to the ABNT rules. This document shows the devel- opment of Limarka, a tool that makes possible to write dissertations and theses with a lightweight markup language, and a experiment involving ten students writing a proposal of dissertations or theses. The methodology used was unstructured interviews with qual- itative analysis. The objectives of this research are: implement a tool to make possible write dissertations and theses according to the ABNT rules and evaluate its usage. The main outcomes of this research comes from two sources: 1) knowledge acquired from the de- velopment of the application. They are: a dissertation or a thesis cannot be produced from a tool that uses the DocBook format as a intermediary format. The abnTeX communite makes available templates according to the ABNT rules. The use of a Latex templates based from abnTeX text. And the generation of Latex Code from Markdown texts. 2) knowledge acquired from the analysis of experiments. They are: For the configuration of the template, the use of PDF form instead of making YAML code. There are evidences that Markdown and Latex are equivalent, in capabilities, and users will find the usage of a lightweight markup language easier to learn and use than Latex. The main conclusion of this work is that it is possible to write a dissertation or a thesis using a lightweight markup and produce documents according to the ABNT rules. / O tema deste trabalho é a utilização de uma linguagem de marcação leve (Markdown) para elaboração de trabalhos de conclusão de curso em conformidade com as Normas da ABNT. Nele relata-se o desenvolvimento da ferramenta Limarka, que possibilitá a es- crita de TCC através de uma linguagem de marcação leve, e um experimental, com dez alunos elaborando propostas de TCCs nela. A metodologia empregada foi experimento com entrevistas semi-estruturadas e análise qualitativa. Os objetivos da pesquisa são: im- plementar uma ferramenta que possibilite a escrita de TCCs em conformidade com as Normas da ABNT e avaliar sua utilização. Os principais resultados da pesquisa tiveram duas fontes: 1) Conhecimentos resultantes do desenvolvimento da aplicação. São eles: um TCC não deve ser produzido por ferramentas que utilizem o formato DocBook como in- termediário; a comunidade abnTeX oferta uma ótima alternativa em Latex para produzir TCCs nacionais em conformidade com as Normas da ABNT; a utilização de um template baseado no modelo de TCC do abnTeX e a geração de códigos Latex a partir de Mark- down possibilita a geração de trabalhos em conformidade com as Normas da ABNT; 2) Conhecimentos provenientes da análise do experimento. São eles: para a configuração do template, a utilização de um formulário PDF, em vez de código YAML, torna o processo de configuração mais fácil; A solução com escrita em Markdown apresentam equivalência de expressividade ao Latex, pois permite a inserção de seus códigos; existem indícios de que os usuários acharão mais fácil aprender e utilizar Markdown do que Latex. A princi- pal conclusão do trabalho indica que é possível utilizar uma linguagem de marcação leve (Markdown) para escrita de TCCs nacionais em conformidade com as Normas da ABNT. E sua utilização deve ser incentivada pois é expressivamente equivalente a Latex, porém mais simples e fácil de ser utilizado.

Creative dissertation. / Malinowski aurait peut-être souhaité que son journal soit révélé à titre posthume afin de contester l’accent mis sur la méthode scientifique par l’anthropologie sociale de son époque. Le dévoilement du journal de Bronislaw Malinowski renverse la domination des explications du fait social par le déterminisme, ouvrant la voie à ce qui devient, dans les années 1960, le tournant discursif. Le journal offre un aperçu de l’impulsion de vitalité de Malinowski et de ses préoccupations existentielles, qui sont excisées dans le processus de réécriture, connu pour transformer les notes de terrain en l’expression formelle caractérisant les monographies. L’anthropologue rédige des monographies pour ses contemporains en construisant des récits étayés par des preuves scientifiques d’une manière qui dissimule par la censure, les automatismes et la catégorie plus large de la subjectivité, ainsi que la possible relégation temporelle de l’Autre, qui peut entraîner la discrimination envers celui-ci. La personnalité publique de l’anthropologue est stylisée par le souci professionnel de représenter correctement le natif-comme-texte. Puisqu’il réfléchit à son avenir publiable, on émet l’hypothèse que Malinowski aurait l’intention de rédiger les entrées de son journal afin d’apporter une contribution posthume à l’anthropologie. Si cela est vrai, le journal est l’espace où les stratégies d’auto-dévoilement surgissent au premier plan, révélant la vulnérabilité supposée de l’auteur. Le dévoilement de l’expérience de vie n’est pas le produit d’un monologue intérieur chaotique, mais possède une fin en soi, qui est de révéler, à travers le mode de l’aveu, l’anthropologue-comme-texte. On pensait autrefois qu’en anthropologie, le système de la vérité était basé sur l’écriture théorique. Maintenant, le journal est mis en évidence. L’héritage de Malinowski repose avant tout sur la sophistique utilisée pour réorganiser le système de vérité entre l’écriture théorique et l’intime, entre la monographie et le journal. Cette réorganisation des vérités est accomplie à travers Writing in Schein qui est mon idiome se référant au jeu textuel avec des composantes du discours destiné à produire la litterarité inspirée d’images brillantes dans l’art apollinien. Writing in Schein est alors la diffusion des apparences, qui amplifie la crise de la représentation entre la copie qui imite, et le simulacre qui invente, puisque la sophistique nécessaire pour aligner les éléments du discours est une folle simulation littéraire. Par l’acte unique du journal et son dévoilement prévu pour la postérité, Malinowski détruit l’enchainement de l’activité productive en anthropologie. / Malinowski may have wished for his diary to be revealed posthumously in order to contest the intense focus on the scientific method, adopted in his time. The unveiling of Bronislaw Malinowski’s diary overthrows the dominance of explanations of social fact based solely on determinism, paving the way for what becomes known, during the 1960s, as the discursive turn. The diary offers insight into Malinowski’s impulse of vitality, along the existential concerns and narratives of personal experience, which are excised in the process of rewriting known to transform field notes into the type of formal expression that characterizes monographs. The anthropologist writes monographs for contemporaries by responding to their expectation of accounts backed by scientific evidence in a way that fosters concealment through censorship, automatisms and the larger category of subjectivity, as well as the possible time-relegation of the Other, which may result in discrimination against him. A positive public persona is stylized out of professional concern for properly staging the native-as-text. It is hypothesized that Malinowski possible future publication of the journal intends to compose its entries so as to make a posthumous contribution to anthropology. If that is true, the journal is the space where strategies of self-showing come to the fore, revealing the author’s assumed vulnerability. The unveiling of life experience is not the product of chaotic interior monologue or brooding, but has an end-goal which is to unveil, through the mode of avowal, the anthropologist-as-text. It was once thought that the anthropological system of truth is based on theoretical writing. Now, however diary is highlighted. Malinowski’s legacy rests foremost upon the sophistry used to reorder the system of truth between theoretical and intimate writing, between the monograph and the diary. This reordering of truths is accomplished through Writing in Schein, which is my idiom referring to the textual play with components of discourse intended to produce beautiful constructs inspired by shining images in Apollonian art. Writing in Schein is then the dissemination of appearances, which amplifies the crisis of representation between the copy that imitates, and the simulacrum that invents, since the sophistry required to align elements of discourse is a mad literary simulation. Through the single act of the diary and its unveiling planned for posterity, Malinowski destroys the sequence of productive activity in anthropology. / Malinowski możliwie życzył sobie, aby dziennik został ujawniony pośmiertnie. Podsuwam hipotezę, że chciał on w ten sposób rzucić wyzwanie metodzie naukowej przyjętej przez ówczesną antropologię społeczną. Odsłonięcie dziennika Bronisława Malinowskiego odwraca uwagę od dominacji wyjaśniania faktów społecznych przez determinizm, torując drogę zwrotowi dyskursywnemu spopularyzowanego w dyscyplinie od lat sześćdziesiątych. Pamiętnik oferuje wgląd w impuls witalności Malinowskiego i jego obaw egzystencjalnych, które są strategicznie wykreślane z tekstu podczas przekształcania notatek terenowych w formalne wyrażenia, charakteryzujące monografie. Antropolog komponuje monografie dla współczesnych czytelników, konstruując tekstualne relacje poparte dowodami naukowymi i cenzurą automatyzmów, szerszej kategorii podmiotowości, a także czasowego degradowania Obcego. Postać publiczna antropologa jest stylizowana, aby poprawnie przedstawiać rdzennego-jako-tekst. Spekuluje się, że zastanawiając się nad swoją publikowalną przyszłością, Malinowski zamierza formułować wpisy do swojego dziennika, aby pośmiertnie przyczynić się do nauki o kulturze, i ludzkości. Jeśli to prawda, dziennik jest przestrzenią, w której ujawnia się jego rzekoma wrażliwość. Odsłonięcie doświadczenia życiowego nie jest wytworem chaotycznego monologu wewnętrznego, ale ma cel samo w sobie ujawnienia, poprzez poufałość, antropologa-jako-tekst. Kiedyś uważano, że w antropologii system prawdy opierał się na piśmie teoretycznym. Teraz dziennik jest podświetlony. Dziedzictwo Malinowskiego polega przede wszystkim na sofistyce, za pomocą której reorganizuje on system prawdy między pismem teoretycznym a prywatnym, między monografią a pamiętnikiem. Tę reorganizację prawd dokonuje się poprzez Scheinschrift, które jest moim idiomem odwołującym się do gry tekstowej mającej na celu wytworzenie systemu wyrazów piękna inspirowanych sztuką apollińską. Scheinschrift potęguje kryzys reprezentacji między modelem a kopiami. Scheinschrift jest zatem sofistyką niezbędną do zestrojenia elementów dyskursu i rozpowszechnienia pozorów, miejącymi na celu kształtowanie szalonej symulacji literackiej. Wyłącznym aktem pisma pamiętnika i jego odsłonięciem przeznaczonym dla potomności, Malinowski niszczy dawny łańcuch twórczej działalności antropologii.