Global ETD Search

11	Analyse critique de la thèse des relations internes du mouvement de l'écologie profonde Cardinal, Hugo 12 1900 (has links) Ce mémoire a pour objectif d'évaluer la plausibilité de la thèse ontologique des relations internes présente dans le mouvement de l'écologie profonde. Selon cette thèse ontologique, chaque organisme entretient avec l'autre une relation interne, c'est-à-dire une relation constitutive de l'identité de ses relata. Il sera défendu dans ce mémoire qu'il n'y a pas suffisamment de relations internes entre les êtres vivants pour justifier la thèse ontologique des relations internes. Deux éléments seront clarifiés pour atteindre cette conclusion. Premièrement, il sera exposé que tous les principaux penseurs du mouvement souscrivent à la thèse des relations internes et qu'il existe un critère permettant d'évaluer cette thèse ontologique. Deuxièmement, il sera précisé que les relations internes présentes dans le mouvement de l'écologie profonde correspondent à des relations de dépendance ontologique au plan de l'identité, qui se distinguent des relations causales au sens où la dépendance ontologique est synchronique tandis que la dépendance causale est diachronique. L'établissement de ce critère distinguant les deux types de relation permettra d'évaluer la thèse des relations internes et de montrer qu'il n'y a pas suffisamment de dépendance ontologique pour que la thèse soit justifiée. / The aim of this work is to assess the plausibility of the ontological thesis of internal relations present in the deep ecology movement. According to this ontological thesis, each organism maintains an internal relationship with the other, i.e. a relationship constitutive of the identity of its relata. It will be argued in this dissertation that there are not enough internal relations among living beings to justify the ontological thesis of internal relations. Two elements will be clarified in order to reach this conclusion. Firstly, it will be stated that all the main thinkers of the movement subscribe to the thesis of internal relations and that there is a criterion for evaluating this ontological thesis. Secondly, it will be clarified that internal relations as construed in the deep ecology movement correspond to relations of ontological dependence, more precisely identity-dependence, which are distinguished from causal relations in the sense that ontological dependence is synchronic whereas causal dependence is diachronic. Establishing this criterion for distinguishing the two types of relationship will enable us to evaluate the internal relations thesis and show that there is not enough ontological dependence for the thesis to be justified. Écologie profonde Relations internes Arne Naess Dépendance ontologique Réalisation de Soi Ontologie Philosophie environnementale Philosophy / Philosophie (UMI : 0422)
12	Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar Wigh, Christian January 2010 (has links) The subject-matter of the following essay is to investigate the relationship between what is commonly called Deep Ecology or Biocentric Philosophy, as articulated by the co-founder of the Deep Ecology Movement, Arne Naess, and later proponents of the biocentric school of environmentalist thought. I contrast Naess’ concept of Self-realization as founded in his Ecosophy T to the ideas of american conservationist and co-founder of the radical green movement Earth First! Dave Foreman, and to the controversial finnish environmentalist and ecofascist Pentti Linkola’s ideological agenda of population-reduction respectively. According to some critics of the movement, especially the social ecologist Murray Bookchin and French liberal philosopher Luc Ferry, the Deep Ecology ideology is essentially misanthropic and totalitarian in structure. A central idea among deep ecologists is that ecosystems and natural entities have intrinsic value in themselves, even outside a human social context. This idea is thought of among deep ecologists to create a philosophically sound basis for counteracting the environmental global crisis. Both Bookchin and Ferry argue that this idea reduces the role of human reason and ethics in a fundamental way, especially in relation to questions concerning population-growth control. My aim is to show that the original intention of Arne Naess in his philosophy (Ekosofi T) does not resemble either Ferrys focus of critique, neither the controversial statements made by Dave Foreman and Earth First! nor Linkolas population-control agenda. Deep Ecology antrophocentrism environmental ethics Arne Naess Dave Foreman Earth First! Pentti Linkola ecofascism Luc Ferry Murray Bookchin. History of science and ideas Idé- o lärdomshistoria
13	Deep ecology and Heideggerian phenomenology [electronic resource] / by Matthew Antolick. Antolick, Matthew. January 2003 (has links) Title from PDF of title page. / Document formatted into pages; contains 90 pages. / Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Florida, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references. / Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. / ABSTRACT: This thesis examines the connections between Arne Naess's Deep Ecology and Martin Heidegger's Phenomenology. The latter provides a philosophical basis for the former. Martin Heidegger's critique of traditional metaphysics and his call for an "event" ontology that is deeper than the traditional substance ontology opens a philosophical space in which a different conception of what it is to be emerges. Heidegger's view of humans also provides a basis for the wider and deeper conception of self Arne Naess seeks: one that gets rid of the presupposition that human beings are isolated subjects embedded in a framework of objects distinct from them. Both Heidegger and Naess illustrate how the substance-ontological dogma affects human culture, encouraging humans to live as if they were divorced from their environmental surroundings. / ABSTRACT: When humans live according to an atomistic conception of themselves as independent from their context, alienation results, not only from each other, and not only of humans from the surrounding environment, but from themselves as well. This thesis focuses on Heidegger's employment of the conception of poiesis or self-bringing-forth as clarifying the "root" of such ecosystemic processes as growth, maturation, reproduction, and death. Thus, Heidegger's call to phenomenology -- "to the things themselves" -- is a call away from the objectifying dichotomies through which substance ontology articulates the world into isolated components. / ABSTRACT: It is the purpose of this thesis to demonstrate not only the connections between the later Heidegger and Naess, but also to argue in favor of their claims that traditional philosophical perspectives regarding humans, the environment, and ethics need to be re-appropriated in a new way in order to avoid further ecological degradation and provide for the health and well being of the future generations that will inevitably inherit the effects of our present actions. / System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. Deep ecology--Philosophy. Phenomenology. self realization. self. naess. heidegger. environmental ethics. phenomenology.
14	Natursyn i antropocen : En ekokritisk läsning av dikter av Ingela Strandberg och Gunnar D Hansson / Representations of Nature in the Anthropocene : An Ecocritical Reading of Poems by Ingela Strandberg and Gunnar D Hansson Olsson, Vera Maria January 2020 (has links) In the Anthropocene, a new approach towards nature in poetry is emerging. This change is closely related to ecocritical theory, which is a reevaluation of the human view on, and representation of, nature. It moves away from a more traditional anthropocentric perspective to a more critical one. This can for instance be in the spirit of Arne Naess or Timothy Morton, the two main theorists used in this essay. This essay is an ecocritical close reading of two Swedish contemporary poems on nature: “När jag går i skymningsmörkret” by Ingela Strandberg (from Att snara en fågel, 2018) and “(Strandförskjutningar)” by Gunnar D Hansson (from Tapeshavet, 2017). The focus of the reading is on the representation of wild, untouched nature. The formulated questions in the essay concern how untouched nature is represented in the poems, the human relationship towards it and how the differences and similarities between the two poems relate to and transform romantic representations of nature. The conclusion is that these two very different poems exemplify the range of contemporary Swedish nature poetry. Strandberg’s poem is leaning towards a romantic or ecosofist representation of nature, whilst Hansson’s is more clear-cut ecocritical in line with Morton’s dark ecology. ecocriticism nature poetry ecopoetry contemporary Swedish poetry Gunnar D Hansson Ingela Strandberg Arne Naess deep ecology ecosophy Timothy Morton dark ecology the Anthropocene ekokritik naturlyrik ekopoesi natursyn samtida svensk poesi Gunnar D Hansson Ingela Strandberg Arne Naess djupekologi ekosofi Timothy Morton mörk ekologi antropocen Languages and Literature Språk och litteratur General Literature Studies Litteraturvetenskap
15	Sanningens väg i det sjätte massutdöendets tidsålder : Heidegger och Parmenides i naturrättens tjänst / The Way of Truth in the Age of the Sixth Mass Extinction : Heidegger and Parmenides in the Service of the Rights of Nature Larsson, Linus January 2024 (has links) The Rights of Nature movement is a quickly growing global phenomenon. However, it is not always obvious what the movement really means. What is its underlying experience? How can its transformative depth be formulated? What is the meaning of this depth? Starting from the ‘Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth’ this essay seeks to elucidate the ontological meaning of these questions through attending to the possible relation of the Rights of Nature movement to Heidegger’s turning toward Parmenides, in the sense of ‘primordial thinker’, or ‘essential thinker’, that is, a thinker who in an essential way thinks the origin as such. This ‘origin’ will be dealt with in relation to the oikos of ecology. In other words ‘essential thinking’ will be brought forward as a thinking that essentially makes possible the mindful awareness of this oikos, this ‘home’, ‘house’, ‘abode’, or ‘place of dwelling’. A chief point of the essay is that an essential experience of this oikos is necessary if the ontological implications of the Rights of Nature movement is to be disclosed. Ecology Deep Ecology Rights of Nature jurisprudence ecophilosophy ecosophy ontology ethics phenomenology ecophenomenology essential thinking aletheia Gaia Mother Earth Martin Heidegger Parmenides Arne Naess Cormac Cullinan Ekologi djupekologi naturens rättigheter naturrätt rättsfilosofi ekofilosofi ekosofi ontologi etik fenomenologi ekofenomenologi väsentligt tänkande aletheia Gaia Moder Jord Martin Heidegger Parmenides Arne Naess Cormac Cullinan Philosophy Filosofi Humanities and the Arts Humaniora och konst

Page generated in 0.0395 seconds