Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-12T15:58:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 arquivo3252_1.pdf: 2382561 bytes, checksum: c2a06bbc48d03850db39ab0f6ef2859e (MD5) license.txt: 1748 bytes, checksum: 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / Este trabalho apresenta uma proposta para gerenciamento e monitoramento de redes virtuais através da adaptação do Nagios, uma ferramenta de gerência e monitoramento amplamente utilizada em datacenters por administradores de rede. Esta adaptação foi implementada através da criação de um plug-in que coleta dados relevantes de switches virtuais realizando inferências de estados de disponibilidade destes switches. Para verificação da usabilidade do plug-in, foi criada uma rede virtual utilizando o software de padrão aberto Openflow e OpenvSwitch em conjunto com o NOX, além da criação de máquinas virtuais sobre o virtualizador KVM com o auxílio da biblioteca libvirt para criação das máquinas virtuais e interfaces virtuais

The main aim of this work is to become familiar with the technology of software-defined networks and learn to use some of the tools to measure and simulate these networks.

New developments in web transport such as HTTP/2 and first and foremost QUIC promise fewer connections to track as well as shorter connection setup times. These protocols have proven themselves on modern reliable connections with a high bandwidth-delay-product, but how do they perform over cellular connections in rural or crowded areas where the connections are much more unreliable? A lot of new users of the web in todays mobile-first usage scenarios are located on poor connections. A testbench was designed that allowed for web browsing over limited network links in a con- trolled environment. We have compared the network load time of page loading over the protocols QUIC, HTTP/2 and HTTP/1.1 using a variety of different network conditions. We then used these measurements as a basis for suggesting which protocol to use during different conditions. The results show that newer is not always better. QUIC in general works reasonably well under all conditions, while HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 trade blows depending on connection conditions, with HTTP/1.1 sometimes outperforming both of the newer protocols.