本研究旨在探討桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市與苗栗縣國民中學校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能之現況，並分別針對不同校長個人背景變項和學校環境變項在校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能的差異加以探討；其次，分析三者之關係；最後則針對其預測力進行檢證。 本研究採問卷調查法，經分層比例抽樣選取桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市與苗栗縣國民中學之學校主任、組長、導師與專任教師為調查分析的對象，抽樣調查42所學校共500位教育人員，回收樣本495 位。以自編「國民中學校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能調查問卷」為工具進行調查，調查所得的資料則以社會科學統計套裝軟體（SPSS for window 17.0 中文版）進行統計，調查所得的資料分別進行描述與推論統計，包括：描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Scheffé事後分析、皮爾遜積差相關、多元逐步回歸分析等統計方法進行後續分析與討論後，獲致以下研究結論： 一、 桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市及苗栗縣國民中學教師對策略領導、學校 組織文化及學校創新經營效能之運作現況的 知覺屬於程度良好， 其中以「策略思維」、「科層型文化」及「學生活動創新效能」層 面的表現最佳，而「轉化願景」、「創新型文化」及「校園環境創 新能」層面較差。 二、 桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市及苗栗縣國民中學不同校長性別在校長策 略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能上具有顯著差異。 三、 不同校長年齡在校長學校組織文化具有顯著差異。而在校長策略領 導與學校創新經營效能上則無顯著差異。 四、 不同校長在校年資在校長策略領導整體及各層面具有顯著差異，而 學校組織文化與學校創新經營未具有顯著差異。 五、 不同校長總年資在校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效 能上具有顯著差異。 六、 不同學校所在地在校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效 能上具有顯著差異。 七、 不同學校歷史在校長策略領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能 之「行政管理創新效能」、「校園環境創新效能」及「社會資源運用 創新效能」方面上具有顯著差異。 八、 不同學校規模在學校組織文化之「創新型文化」層面與學校創新經 營效能上具有顯著差異。而校長策略領導則無顯著差異。 九、 桃園縣、新竹縣、新竹市及苗栗縣國民中學校長策略領導、學校組 織文化與學校創新經營效能三者之間有密切的正相關。 十、 校長策略領導與學校組織文化對學校創新經營效能整體具有預測力 其中以「創新型文化」、「轉化願景」、「引領變革」與層面最具 預測力。 十一、校長策略領導與學校組織文化各層面對整體學校創新經營效能各 層面具有預測力。 最後，依據研究結果，提出具體建議，俾供教育行政機關、校長以及後續研 究者之參考。 關鍵詞: 校長策略領導、學校組織文化、學校創新經營效能 / This research aims to study the current situations of school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools, especially in the junior high schools in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, and Maoli County. The school principals’ different personal backgroud and dissimilar environments of different schools are dissected while analyzing the relationship among the three. Moreover, the predictability of the three is examined respestively. The questionnaire investigation of this research adopts stratified random sampling method, and the subjects of the investigation are the school deans, section chiefs, homeroom teachers and subject teachers in the junior high schools in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, and Maoli County. Questionnaires are distributed to 500 educational personnel in 42 schools, and 495 of which are collected. The questionnaire used in the investigation is self-designed and the collected data and statistics are compiled by exercising SPSS for window 17.0. The acquired data are described, analyzed and discussed by using descriptive statistic, t-Test, One-way ANOVA, Scheffé Method, Pearson product-moment correlation, multiple regression analysis, and the findings are as the following. I. The junior high school teachers in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, and Maoli County are well aware of the situations of their school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools, especially in the aspects of ‘Tactic Thinking’, ‘Bureaucratic Culture’, and ‘Efficacy of Innovative Student Activities.’ Yet, the teachers don’t realize much about the aspects of ‘Prospect of Transformation’, ‘Innovative Culture’ and ‘Efficacy of Innovative School Environment.’ II. The gender difference of the school principals leads to obvious differences in school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, and Maoli County. III. The age difference of the school principals leads to obvious differences in the organizational cultrue of the schools. Rather, it makes no evidence differences in the school principals’ strategic leadership and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. IV. The difference in the years of working experence in the schools of the school principals leads to obvious differences in school principals’ strategic leadership. Rather, it makes no evidence differences in the organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. V. The difference in the total years of working experience of the school principals leads to obvious differences in school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. VI. The difference in the location of the schools leads to obvious differences in school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. VII. The difference in the history of the schools leads to obvious differences in school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and ‘Efficacy of Administrative Management’, ‘Efficacy of Innovative School Environment’ and ‘Efficacy of Application of Innovative Social Resources’ of the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. VIII. The difference in the scale of the school leads to obvious differences in the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools, and ‘Innovative Culture’ in organizational cultrue of the schools. Rather, it makes no evidence difference in the school principals’ strategic leadership IX. There is a highly positive correlation among school principals’ strategic leadership, organizational cultrue of the schools, and the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, and Maoli County. X. School principals’ strategic leadership, and organizational cultrue of the schools have predictability in the overall efficacy of the innovative management in the schools, especially in the aspects of ‘Innovative Culture’, ‘Prospect of Transformation’, and ‘Leading Reformation.’ XI. School principals’ strategic leadership, and organizational culture of the schools have predictability in different perspectives of the efficacy of the innovative management in the schools. At last, accoring to the results of the research, I’ve made some suggestions, hoping to provide reference materials for educational administrative organizations, school principals and other researchers in this field.